Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
4. Exactly, we need a claw back in several ways
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 05:05 PM
Mar 2015

First, we need a substantial rise in the minimum wage. Doubling it is not out of the question. There will be some inflation associated with this, but that's not a bad thing unless you're a rich man who relies on paper value of investments instead of on their income.

Second, we desperately need a Wall Street transaction tax to take the profit out of HFT and make it much more difficult to skim money off every transaction as is happening now. Likely the bite from the Feds will be cheaper than what HFT is doing.

Third, we need a progressive taxation system tied to inflation that will cover earned and unearned income. That will avoid shafting retirees who rely on interest and dividends as well as have the wealthy pay their fair share.

Fourth, we need some real teeth in the inheritance tax to make sure plutocrats can't pass on their ill gotten gains intact. That means tightening up on the foundation scams.

Fifth, we need to be willing to enact the death penalty on scofflaw corporations hiding money overseas. Withdrawing their charters and making it impossible for them to reorganize unless the cash comes back into the country and their taxes are paid might be just the incentive they need.

Sixth, with revenues increasing from all of the above, we need to roll back regressive taxes that were used to disguise the damage that tax cuts for the rich did to the treasury by beggaring the rest of us.

Seventh, we need to enact real tax breaks for corporations that move their manufacturing back into the US, something a lot of them would love to do for a number of reasons but need an incentive to trade for the loss of cheap labor.

Eighth, the Pentagon has to go on a diet, a strict one. We can't afford a bloated military being misused in wars of corporate convenience.

I don't want to soak anyone Sherman A1 Mar 2015 #1
We should tax and tax and tax them until they're only fabulously wealthy. Scuba Mar 2015 #3
Unfortuantely, tax monies usually only encourage the political elite to fund new wars. truedelphi Mar 2015 #22
While those are important considerations salib Mar 2015 #26
So your rationale is to keep taxes on the wealthy low, 'cause government might misuse the money? Scuba Mar 2015 #31
Report after report shows that when our modern government has more money, truedelphi Mar 2015 #48
Hey, at least you stuck to your position. Gotta give you that. Scuba Mar 2015 #49
"This was not growth." That's correct. It was legalized theft. Hard to tell where ... Scuba Mar 2015 #2
There is little difference between a campaign "donation", paying exhorbant fees for speeches or rhett o rick Mar 2015 #5
Exactly, we need a claw back in several ways Warpy Mar 2015 #4
If you are running, you got my vote. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #6
/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba Mar 2015 #7
Warpy and Scuba for co-president. antiquie Mar 2015 #10
We also need 1) a minimum guaranteed income. 2) Publicly funded health CARE for all. 3) Publicly Vincardog Mar 2015 #11
I like all offerred aspirant Mar 2015 #16
Vote for Warpy! Enthusiast Mar 2015 #12
Do you see any hope that any of this will happen? It seems to me that the wealthy have already Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2015 #13
Boy you took the words right out of my mouth. n/t. airplaneman Mar 2015 #15
I admire the platform Fairgo Mar 2015 #54
The rich are the ones who soaked us. phantom power Mar 2015 #8
Well, Newest Reality Mar 2015 #9
A heavy brine. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #14
Or... Alkene Mar 2015 #17
Are they equivalent? rock Mar 2015 #18
They both amount to the same but the poor rich want sympathy so they are claiming rhett o rick Mar 2015 #20
I heard an interesting idea on the radio yesterday. world wide wally Mar 2015 #19
It amounts to the same thing, doesn't it? Jack Rabbit Mar 2015 #21
It's a matter of perspective. When the rich steal our wealth they call it good business. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #23
In a real democracy, our perspective is the only one that matters Jack Rabbit Mar 2015 #24
Bahwhahahahah! truedelphi Mar 2015 #50
Wasn't the MOB'S slogan aspirant Mar 2015 #28
I think the problem is framing ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #25
Would it turn into another sell/trade credit program like carbon emissions? ~ nt antiquie Mar 2015 #27
I hadn't thought about that ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #29
Good ideas. antiquie Mar 2015 #30
As I said in another thread ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #32
Isn't this a chicken or the egg conundrum? Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #33
I think change will take a large percentage of the populace. antiquie Mar 2015 #34
Yep, Elizabeth Warren is showing the way Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #35
Obviously we are not communicating. ~ nt antiquie Mar 2015 #36
So what is your point? Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #37
You made it for me. You choose to read the opposite of what I said. antiquie Mar 2015 #38
Seriously? Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #40
Making demands without convincing and workable solutions is ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #39
I don't see the "problem" as a lack of a plan Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #41
I will repeat for the third time (this time adding emphasis) ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #42
Who needs to be convinced any plan is workable? Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #43
Okay ... the non-convincing part is working so well. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #44
What? Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #45
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #46
Cool, thanks for focusing this discussion Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #47
"IF there was the political will in Congress" ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #53
The IF is ever present given our political/economic climate Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #55
He isn't talking about framing but selling old conservative snake oil to actually further TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #56
So sorry I appreciated 1StrongBlackMan comments. antiquie Mar 2015 #57
K&R. JDPriestly Mar 2015 #51
So far, yes..."They've/MSM" has been fredamae Mar 2015 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Soak the Rich? Or Get Our...»Reply #4