Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
8. The reason for that is obvious. It is in the interests of those in power to keep the people divided
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jun 2015

To talk about the reality of class warfare could cause the unthinkable, people uniting AGAINST those who are responsible for the economic inequality that exists in this country today.

It would mean not having those 'weapons' to use in elections eg.

People with an agenda, they will always exist, too much attention is paid to them. Here, all we have to do is ignore them.

And btw, Bernie is right! Why anyone would want to deny AAs the same economic opportunities as white people is beyond me, or deny that poverty isn't a factor in how people are treated in society. But as I said, that would remove the divisiveness, cause people to unite, and we can't have that.

Some people go too far. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #1
I'm heartily sick of the Social Justice Warriors on DU, that's for sure Warpy Jun 2015 #2
Thanks for the post. I am probably near your age because I have seen rhett o rick Jun 2015 #6
Hey Warpy.. 2banon Jun 2015 #15
The Two Minute Hate is popular with a certain crowd. Maedhros Jun 2015 #3
+1 nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #7
I think it's more than that. I think it's used to promote an agenda. The liberal agenda is rhett o rick Jun 2015 #9
So many posters have nothing to contribute other than vitriol and mockery, Maedhros Jun 2015 #10
I think it's a self-righteous mob mentality. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #19
Middle School Playground mentality. [n/t] Maedhros Jun 2015 #20
yep! rhett o rick Jun 2015 #21
I think I agree with this passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #23
How do we define "social justice"? kentuck Jun 2015 #4
Some people try to separate social justice from economic justice. This is wrong. rhett o rick Jun 2015 #5
The reason for that is obvious. It is in the interests of those in power to keep the people divided sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #8
Social justice is directly connected to economic justice IMO. L0oniX Jun 2015 #11
I think that's obvious. But the Third Way wants to seperate them because rhett o rick Jun 2015 #12
The Third way may have some racist tendencies as well. L0oniX Jun 2015 #13
I don't know specifically about racism in the Third Way, but I believe the Plutocratic-Oligarchs rhett o rick Jun 2015 #14
Right, lip service to social justice and ignoring economic justice. 2banon Jun 2015 #17
that's my view too. 2banon Jun 2015 #18
Yes, Socio-Economic Justice 2banon Jun 2015 #16
Yeah, I tried to point that out and got slammed Warpy Jun 2015 #22
But: It is harder to have social injustice in the face of economic justice, but it's NOT impossible. merrily Aug 2015 #24
This article complains about identity politics and balkanization of certain groups, then merrily Aug 2015 #25
Yes. Real change is made by forging coalitions among demographics. Smarmie Doofus Aug 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Do Some Social Justice Ad...»Reply #8