Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Solnit: Unconscious Bias is Running for President [View all]
"...Ive just spent a month watching white male people in particular arguing about who has charisma or relatability or electability. They speak as if these were objective qualities, and as if their own particular take on them was truth or fact rather than taste, and as if what white men like is what everyone likes or white men are who matters, which is maybe a hangover from the long ugly era when only white men voted. Its a form of self-confidence that verges on lunacy, because one of the definitions of that condition is the inability to distinguish between subjective feelings and objective realities.
Ryan Lizza, fired from the New Yorker for undisclosed sexual misconduct, tweeted, The Kamala Harris fundraising numbers drive home just how impressive Pete Buttigiegs fundraising numbers are when hers were nearly twice as large, and maybe who has money to donate and why white men have always been carried forward and black women have always been held back are relevant things here. One notable thing about the 2016 election is that some of the leading pundits whose misogyny helped shape the raceincluding Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Glenn Thrushwere later charged with sexual abuse or harassment; that is, their public bias was paralleled by appalling private misconduct. Foxs Bill OReilly and Roger Ailes were outed earlier; heads of networks, directors, and producers have also been outed as serial sexual abusers in charge of our dominant narratives.
Meanwhile, the New York Times in all its august unbearability just published this prize sentence in a piece about Joe Bidens failure to offer Anita Hill an apology she found adequate: Many former Judiciary Committee aides and other people who participated did not want to talk on the record because they feared that scrutiny of Mr. Bidens past conduct would undermine the campaign of the candidate some think could be best positioned to defeat President Trump, whose treatment of women is a huge issue for Democrats. That translates as, lets run a guy whose treatment of women is an issue, and lets ignore that treatment because even so we think that hes best positioned to defeat the guy whose treatment of women is an issue, and also fuck treatment of women, especially this black woman, as an issue, really....
The problem, as feminist philosopher Kate Manne put it recently, is that what we say now is not just commentary about what is possible; it is shaping what is possible. She said, If we knew for sure that a candidate couldnt beat Trump, that would be reason not to support them. But electability isnt a static social fact; its a social fact were constructing. Part of what will make someone unelectable is people give up on them in a way that would be premature, rather than going to the mat for them. ...What makes a candidate electable is in part how much positive coverage they get, and how much positive coverage they get is tied to how the media powers decide who is electable, and so goes the double bind...."
https://lithub.com/rebecca-solnit-unconscious-bias-is-running-for-president/?fbclid=IwAR2ZdtO0oET9YBnjZ0ibWWyOQJqByYOaUaeQD3Pe7jK9E6iVPQOFbysiris
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided