Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Bettie

(16,109 posts)

14. The thing is that if it really was a conflict of interest

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Fri Sep 20, 2019, 07:32 PM

Sep 2019

Well, we had a Republican congress at the time. Why did they not open an investigation into it at that time?

They opened investigations into everything else and they weren't shy or coy about it.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Politifact: Hunter's directorship at the Ukrainian gas company posed a conflict of interest for Joe. [View all] pnwmom Sep 2019 OP

From the Intercept: "there is simply no truth to the rumor" emulatorloo Sep 2019 #1

I agree with that particular article, but Glenn Greenwald's The Intercept is not a source pnwmom Sep 2019 #4

Someone is on an anti-Biden spree n/t PhoenixDem Sep 2019 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Sep 2019 #7

Hunter should have had a golf course or hotel in Ukraine. rickford66 Sep 2019 #3

I think I need to alert this for repeating GOP talking points EveHammond13 Sep 2019 #5

Hope you are right, but I don't see how urging Ukraine to fire Hoyt Sep 2019 #6

See bolded quote from my post above emulatorloo Sep 2019 #8

He was doing that before Hunter showed up. We were Hortensis Sep 2019 #9

Why the alleged Joe Biden 'Ukraine conspiracy' doesn't hold up Cha Sep 2019 #10

That clearly helps. Biden needs to get that out too because it will Hoyt Sep 2019 #12

Thanks Hoyt! Hoping trump and Cha Sep 2019 #13

Dotard does not get to say a single thing about it! treestar Sep 2019 #11

The thing is that if it really was a conflict of interest Bettie Sep 2019 #14

Just taking the position created a conflict of "interest." But there is no evidence pnwmom Sep 2019 #15

My point is actually that the Bettie Sep 2019 #16

Right. Because they knew there wasn't anything there. n/t pnwmom Sep 2019 #17

And it hasn't been taken up since the election either. hedda_foil Sep 2019 #18

Joe has leverage on both sides of the aisle n/t Bidenator Sep 2019 #19