Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
Mon Apr 1, 2019, 09:21 PM Apr 2019

Has everyone lost their collective minds?? [View all]

1. Sexual harrassment did not happen by any definition.
2. Sexual assault did not happen by any definition.
3. Biden does have a well recorded history of being a contact person. This does not equate to either of the conditions laid out in 1 or 2, but it is an opening for persons receiving said affection to be uncomfortable, and the person whose personal space is invaded does have the right to be or not be uncomfortable as a result.
4. Anyone who has been through any kind of LCEC, or workplace harassment course can tell you, there are behaviors that are not acceptable period (wanton staring/leering, groping, cornering in a threatening manner, conditioning career advancement in return for personal attentions) which does not warrant response to be in violation.
5. there are conditions where it is incumbent upon the person who is made uncomfortable to make an oral declaration of discomfort, such as complimenting ones attire, placing hands upon a person in any way that is not overtly sexual in nature, or making a verbal or non-verbal request of an intimate nature (such as asking to go out for drinks, or dinner).
6. Biden made the PERFECT response of acknowledging the complaint against him, validating the feelings of the person making the complaint, and issuing heartfelt remorse that any behavior of his may have made a person feel discomfort.
7. It does NOT matter that the person stating feelings of violation has a history of wearing any kind of clothing, or appearance. He/she/they give NO consent to ANY behavior based on their dress, appearance, or history.
8. It does NOT matter if the person stating the feelings of violation has a history of accepting the contact or discourse with others. He/she/they have stated an issue of feeling violation for this incident. It matters. It deserves to be addressed.

I really wish more would respect the person(‘s) making complaints, because not doing so now distinctly sends the message that it isn’t okay to come forward with more serious infractions, and I also wish that more would recognize that this isn’t the same level of infraction, the accused has made a statement that completely respects the accusors, and promises atonement, which is standard and generally accepted recompense for the level of infraction that was committed.

GET A GRIP PEOPLE!!!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
yes I agree jimlup Apr 2019 #1
Sure, there's a double standard fountainofyouth Apr 2019 #2
Amen, Amimnoch, Amen. Haggis for Breakfast Apr 2019 #3
Gosh...there are times (such as these) in which it is a definite advantage Glorfindel Apr 2019 #4
Yes, a rare benefit for sure. Amimnoch Apr 2019 #12
This trash is the product of right wing meme factories pscot Apr 2019 #5
Yes not fooled Apr 2019 #9
Joe Biden made googly-eyes at me across the room! Put me on tv Jake Tapper! EveHammond13 Apr 2019 #6
Kick Hekate Apr 2019 #7
well.... handmade34 Apr 2019 #8
Nice post. PatrickforO Apr 2019 #10
Agree completely nt Meowmee Apr 2019 #11
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Has everyone lost their c...»Reply #0