Assuming you will vote for the nominee in the General either way would you rather

[Hortensis]

12. All these health epidemics, lung, kidneys, heart, childhood

asthma are dragging us down. Yes, they're due to humanity-level lifestyle changes, and we'd beat them in time, but just think of the costs until then.

When I do, I'm much more inclined to flip a coin with their lives. Safe, they live. Lose, health-cleansing of our population, leaving it leaner and meaner, literally in both senses. Looked at right, they could both be considered win-win options.

And when I add in the cost of providing livings for all the workers the 0.01% don't need any more! Should that be a problem for those of us retired on our own savings? I. Don't. Think. So. As long as we don't have to see them when we go out.

As for voting citizenship, 40% of Americans don't bother anyway, and probably another third insist it's a waste of time. So they wouldn't miss it. Briefly anyway, and then it'd be in their interests to shut their mouths and get over it.

I think I vote for NOT safe. (Did I mention we're both white and straight?) We've got ours. As long as our healths held up and we took care not to cross the authorities. I spend too much time on these forums anyway.