I'm getting this on my phone so it's harder

to click thru onto links. That's a bummer. Also indicates that if those were its ratings that far back and they kept it on anyway, they don't seem to be very responsive to their viewers.

I like it, too!

LOVE Joy Reid! She's the best and most fearless interviewer on television. She suffers NO fools and tolerates NO "Gish Gallop" or other "strategic" blabber-mouthing!

And DUMP GRETA!!!

My husband said it's probably because they wanted to get CONS to show up for interviews. Put a "friendly" in there.

Wouldn't surprise me.

Welcome to DU, notdarkyet.

That would be fine with me. Or a big butterfly net. Or both!

And in as many different ways as possible!

He needs to see this and hear this and be confronted by this - EVERYWHERE.

He should not be able to escape it - ANYWHERE.

Resist in every way possible/imaginable.

Let's get creative, people!

INDEED! Last night, when I clicked on "Follow" I noticed that it was at 114 thousand.

Then I went over and found the @ungaggedEPA and followed that. It was at about 1000 at that moment.

Just a few minutes later I went back over to @AltNatParkSer and just in those few minutes, the likes had increased by another 4,000.

And at that point, I returned to @ungaggedEPA and their 1000 number had almost doubled. It was at 1900-and-some.

This is GREAT! Hopefully there are secondary alternative sites where this info is accessible, in case some nogoodniks in trump's orbit try to take down these early ones. I don't trust trump-&-comp any farther than I can throw my house.

Yeah, unfortunately. That sounds like a very reasonable concern to me.

And the CONS are all so thrilled and relieved that they "won" (OR I'd submit the more accurate verb here is "STOLE&quot the White House back that they'll do anything to sustain that status.

They've been dying to get the White House back, especially with a stooge installed at the top, who, as their anti-tax "god" Grover Norquist has said, only needs to know how to hold a pen - to sign whatever they put in front of him. I was gratified to see a clip of him at a podium talking about that very thing, played on either CNN or MSNBC in the last couple of days.

CONNECT THE DOTS.

She could just as easily have opted for a pantsuit - oh, never mind.

No kidding.

I, too, am enjoying how this individual, whom I am seeing more and more frequently referred to as various versions of "baby man", is his own worst enemy. He can't help himself. He keeps on obsessing. And as long as he's stuck on this kind of thing, the press will keep reporting it and it will still be talked about and laughed at, and the problem will NOT go away. It'll only get worse, and remain in the public's mind. He's keeping it up front because he's simply incapable of letting it go. And that only makes it worse, and drives it farther down deeper into the national zeitgeist. We've never had a so-called "president" who's become a joke this quickly - at least that I can recall.

It's really quite illuminating to stop for a moment and just wrap your brain around this size thing of his. He's clearly got an abnormally profound issue with size. The size of his crowds, the size of his hands, the size of his victory, the size of his buildings, you name it. Makes me wonder if the size of his - um - "manhood" - is so minuscule that it'd fit in a thimble with plenty of room left over. Why else would he be so obsessive about size? Bigliness I guess you could call it.