Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

babylonsister's Journal
babylonsister's Journal
October 21, 2020

Why Trump's Rallies Probably Aren't Working



https://politicalwire.com/2020/10/21/why-trumps-rallies-probably-arent-workimg/

Why Trump’s Rallies Probably Aren’t Working
October 21, 2020 at 6:39 am EDT By Taegan Goddard


Politico: “Trump views rallies in battleground states as the linchpin of his closing argument, a means to excite his supporters and ensure they vote on Nov. 3. But many Republicans close to the White House, former senior administration officials and political advisers say the rallies are largely a way to keep the unscripted and undisciplined president occupied, since they do little to persuade new Trump voters. Rallies, they note, do not woo senior citizens, independents or suburban women, many of whom have moved away from the Trump ticket this election cycle. Most of Trump’s rallies are no longer televised nationally as they once were.”

“And with coronavirus infection rates climbing, the Trump rallies often draw negative headlines in local news markets because the packed events defy public health guidelines, featuring few masks and almost no social distancing.”
October 20, 2020

Republican Debate Commission Chairman Unloads On Trump For Lying About Debate

https://www.politicususa.com/2020/10/20/trump-debate-commission.html

Posted on Tue, Oct 20th, 2020 by Jason Easley
Republican Debate Commission Chairman Unloads On Trump For Lying About Debate


Republican co-chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates, Frank Fahrenkopf set the record straight on Trump’s lies about the debate rules.

Fahrenkopf said on MSNBC:

We’ve done over 30 of the general election presidential and vice-presidential debates we’ve never had a cycle like this one. First of all, the president this morning and some of his people said that this was supposed to be a foreign policy debate and we somehow changed the rules. Not the case, it was never to be a foreign policy focus. I asked them to go back and look at the debate in 2016. Both the debates, Lester Holt did the first one, Chris Wallace did the last one.

There was no focus on foreign policy for one and domestic on the other, so the debate people at the Trump Organization knew that there was no focus on foreign policy. Now, whether they told the president or not, I can’t say.

Now, with regard to the microphones, both parties agreed before the first debate, and also agreed again for the second, that when we start the 6-minute — the 15-minute segments, that the first 4 minutes are divided into 2 minutes for each candidate without interruption. If you watched the first debate, easy to see that those rules were not followed even though they agreed to it. All the commission has done is not create a new rule. We didn’t touch the rules. All we did was put in a situation where if someone is interrupting, they won’t be allowed to interrupt.

When, for example, if President Trump is the first one to go forward, he will speak for two minutes without interruption and Joe Biden’s microphone will be turned off during that period of time. When the president finishes and Joe Biden starts his two minutes, the president’s microphone goes off. Once they both have completed their two minutes, then the microphones are on for the rest of the debate for that section. So, the allegations that are there are just false. They’re not true. It’s not the way things happen. And we’re going forward as we said. And the president has agreed to debate. We’re yet to hear definitively from the Biden campaign, but we’re hopefully looking forward to having a good debate, a little more controlled, a little more civility, when we get to Nashville Thursday.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1318632894869524482

Trump is trying to build in an excuse for when he loses the next debate. Trump uses the same pattern every time. Donald Trump is going to claim that the debate was rigged against him.

The President wants a debate where the rules aren’t enforced and he can spend 90 minutes interrupting, bullying, and yelling about Hunter Biden. A structured debate where he might be forced to stay on topic and answer questions only harms Trump.


The debate commission is not putting Trump smearing their credibility because he needs an excuse for what is likely to be another poor debate performance.
October 20, 2020

Tech Donors Unleash $100 Million In Ads Against Trump

https://politicalwire.com/2020/10/20/tech-donors-unleash-100-million-in-ads-against-trump/

Tech Donors Unleash $100 Million In Ads Against Trump
October 20, 2020 at 2:11 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard


“A little-known Democratic super PAC backed by some of Silicon Valley’s biggest donors is quietly unleashing a torrent of television spending in the final weeks of the presidential campaign in a last-minute attempt to oust President Trump,” Recode reports.

“The barrage of late money — which includes at least $22 million from Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz — figures among one of the most expensive and aggressive plays yet by tech billionaires, who have spent years studying how to maximize the return they get from each additional dollar they spend on politics. Moskovitz is placing his single biggest public bet yet on the evidence that TV ads that come just before Election Day are the best way to do that.”
October 20, 2020

South Dakota Speaker Battles the Coronavirus

https://politicalwire.com/2020/10/20/south-dakota-speaker-battles-the-coronavirus/

South Dakota Speaker Battles the Coronavirus
October 20, 2020 at 11:49 am EDT By Taegan Goddard


South Dakota Speaker of the House Steve Haugaard (R) told the Sioux Falls Argus Leader that he spent the last two weeks dealing with a severe case of the coronavirus that’s infected thousands of South Dakotans in recent months.

Said Haugaard: “It’s been the most devastating stuff I’ve ever had in my life.”
October 20, 2020

2 More Funny Feelings About 2020


2 More Funny Feelings About 2020
With 14 days until the election, it’s time to inch even farther out on that limb.
By TIM ALBERTA
10/20/2020 04:30 AM EDT
Tim Alberta is chief political correspondent at Politico Magazine.

snip//

The problem for Trump? That holdout of college-educated white men is breaking—and not in his direction.

Twice in the past week, I’ve been given reliable polling from the ground in battleground states that suggests something that was once unthinkable: Trump is losing college-educated white men for the first time in his presidency. The margins aren’t huge, but they are consistent with a trend line that dates to 2018, when Republicans carried this demographic by just 4 points. What the numbers suggest—in both private and public polling—is that Biden is no longer just walloping Trump among white women in the suburbs, he’s pulling ahead with white men there, as well.

We shouldn’t get carried away with this just yet. Republicanism is deep in the DNA of many of these voters, and it wouldn’t be surprising to see a last-minute lurch back in the direction of their political home.

Still, the fact that Trump is sweating college-educated white men two weeks out from Election Day tells you everything you need to know about the state of the race at this moment. There has been growing speculation of late, among the sharpest minds in the political class, about a blowout in November—the sort of landslide victory for Biden that we haven’t seen in decades. There’s hardly any guarantee of that happening; Trump still clings to a stubborn path to victory, albeit a narrow one.

But if it does happen—if the floodgates open and Trump is washed out by a historic blue wave—we will look to unlikely groups of voters as the reason why. One of those groups has gotten plenty of ink: seniors. But keep an eye on college-educated white men as the other.

2. We’re overthinking this campaign

More than 219,000 Americans are dead from a global pandemic. Millions of adults are home from work and millions of kids are home from school. The streets of big cities and small towns have been convulsing with anger and protest and even sporadic violence.

All of this is politically significant. All of it has contributed to an election-year environment that is fundamentally detrimental to the incumbent.

But if Trump loses, the biggest factor won’t be Covid-19 or the economic meltdown or the social unrest. It will be his unlikability
.

more...

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/10/20/alberta-two-weeks-2020-election-feelings-430238
October 20, 2020

Biden Keeps Raising Money

https://politicalwire.com/2020/10/20/biden-keeps-raising-money/

Biden Keeps Raising Money
October 20, 2020 at 8:48 am EDT By Taegan Goddard


Daily Beast: “Even by post-Citizens United standards, it is an absurd, Scrooge McDuck-level haul. The Biden campaign could suspend fundraising entirely and drop more than $20 million a day, every day, until the election without bouncing a single check. But according to top-level donors and an ambitious schedule of upcoming fundraisers, there’s no plan to slow down—just in case the trove of ‘fuck you’ money needs to become ‘see you in court’ money.”

“According to fundraisers who spoke to The Daily Beast, the campaign is still leaning hard on its donor network, explicitly pointing ahead to its potential need to fund legal battles in multiple states following the election.”
October 20, 2020

The Good Son

Older article, but scary.

The Good Son
Polished, soft-spoken, and a self-styled moderate, Jared Kushner has become his father-in-law’s most dangerous enabler.
Story by Franklin Foer
August 13, 2020


Jared Kushner, the second-most-powerful man in the White House, is quite a bit smarter than the most powerful man, his father-in-law, the president. Donald Trump possesses a genius for the jugular, but he evinces few other signs of intelligence. He certainly displays no capacity, or predisposition, to learn. His son-in-law, by contrast, appears to have sufficient analytic acumen to comprehend that the country has been brought to its knees by the coronavirus pandemic. Kushner might not be the brightest public servant in American history—he is a Harvard graduate who is also a leading symbol of college-admissions corruption, and a businessman with a substantial record of failure—but he has shown flashes of effectiveness in his time at the White House. Because he projects a facsimile of capability and because he shows, at irregular intervals, a seemingly genuine interest in governing, he is also an exasperating mystery.

Like many Americans, I’ve been watching Kushner for four years now, and I’ve asked myself this question: Why does he enable his father-in-law’s worst impulses? The answer, I believe, is embedded in the core of his biography. I’ve spent months studying Kushner’s personal history. This story is built on more than two dozen interviews, with current and former White House officials who have worked intimately with Kushner, as well as outside advisers whose wisdom he has sought, business associates, and old family friends. (Kushner himself declined to comment.)

In the marriage of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, Kushner is arguably the one with the more domineering father. From an early age, Jared learned how to accumulate influence by faithfully serving the interests of powerful, mercurial men. He grew adept at managing their outbursts, or rather, he learned how to avoid becoming their target. For all the power Kushner has amassed, his ascent required the submission of self and the stifling of principle.

more...

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/08/how-jared-kushner-became-trumps-most-dangerous-enabler/615169/

October 19, 2020

Trump campaign demands change to final debate topics

Natch.


Trump campaign demands change to final debate topics
By Morgan Chalfant - 10/19/20 04:33 PM EDT



The Trump campaign is demanding that the Commission on Presidential Debates adjust the topics for the final presidential debate so that the meeting focuses on foreign policy.

Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien penned a letter to the commission Monday raising objections with the topics announced by moderator and NBC News correspondent Kristen Welker last week, saying the commission should observe “long-standing custom” by making foreign policy the central focus of Thursday’s debate. Stepien also claimed the campaigns had agreed to the third debate being focused on foreign policy.

“As is the long-standing custom, and as has been promised by the Commission on Presidential Debates, we had expected that foreign policy would be the central focus of the October 22 debate. We urge you to recalibrate the topics and return to subjects which had already been confirmed,” Stepien wrote.


snip//

Biden’s campaign, however, says that there was a prior agreement that the moderator would select the topics and that the Trump campaign is lying so that Trump could sidestep questions about his administration’s “disastrous” response to the coronavirus pandemic.

"The campaigns and the Commission agreed months ago that the debate moderator would choose the topics,” said national press secretary TJ Ducklo. “The Trump campaign is lying about that now because Donald Trump is afraid to face more questions about his disastrous COVID response. As usual, the president is more concerned with the rules of a debate than he is getting a nation in crisis the help it needs."


Stepien's letter comes days after Welker announced that the topics of the debate would be fighting the coronavirus pandemic, American families, race in America, climate change, national security, and leadership.

more...

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/521744-trump-campaign-demands-change-to-final-debate-topics
October 19, 2020

'Our house is on fire': Suburban women lead charge vs. Trump

'Our house is on fire': Suburban women lead charge vs. Trump
By CLAIRE GALOFARO



TROY, Mich. (AP) — She walks with the determination of a person who believes the very fate of democracy might depend on the next door she knocks on, head down, shoulders forward. She wears nothing fussy, the battle fatigues of her troupe: yoga pants and sneakers. She left her Lincoln Aviator idling in the driveway, the driver door open -- if this house wasn’t the one to save the nation, she can move quickly to the next.

For most of her life, until 2016, Lori Goldman had been politically apathetic. Had you offered her $1 million, she says, she could not have described the branches of government in any depth. She voted, sometimes.

Now every moment she spends not trying to rid America of President Donald Trump feels like wasted time.

“We take nothing for granted,” she tells her canvassing partner. “They say Joe Biden is ahead. Nope. We work like Biden is behind 20 points in every state.”



Lori Goldman, talks with a voter while canvassing in Troy, Mich. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

Goldman spends every day door knocking for Democrats in Oakland County, Michigan, an affluent Detroit suburb. She feels responsible for the country’s future: Trump won Michigan in 2016 by 10,700 votes and that helped usher him into the White House. Goldman believes people like her -- suburban white women -- could deliver the country from another four years of chaos.

For many of those women, the past four years have meant frustration, anger and activism — a political awakening that powered women’s marches, the #MeToo movement and the victories of record numbers of female candidates in 2018. That energy has helped create the widest gender gap — the political divide between men and women — in recent history. And it has started to show up in early voting as women are casting their ballots earlier than men. In Michigan, women have cast nearly 56% of the early vote so far, and 68% of those were Democrats, according to the voting data firm L2.


more...

https://apnews.com/article/suburban-women-trump-biden-michigan-6e0e7217e86929c46f729c4127341340

October 19, 2020

Eric Boehlert: Both Sides -- the press keeps screwing up Covid relief bill coverage

Both Sides — the press keeps screwing up Covid relief bill coverage
GOP in disarray
Eric Boehlert

snip//

Leaning into a "gridlock" and "dysfunction" narrative, the Beltway media have botched the story for most of this year. Last summer, journalists claimed "Congress" was to blame for weekly $600 relief checks being cut off. Wrong — the payments ended because Republicans forced them to end. That kind of Both Side coverage has given Americans a skewed understanding of why the federal government under Trump isn't functioning properly in a time of national crisis.

Background: Democrats in the House are currently offering a $2.2 trillion relief bill, which has already been drastically scaled back from the original $3.5 trillion proposal they passed in May. (Republicans ignored the May bill, in part, because White House aides were telling GOP leaders the pandemic would be over by September.) The $2.2 trillion bill includes $600 in weekly enhanced unemployment benefits, and checks of $1,200 to qualifying adults (or $2,400 for couples).

The White House says it supports a $1.8 trillion bill. So why don't both sides negotiate, meet in the middle, and sign a deal to help millions of Americans who need assistance, as the economy remains broken? That's the narrative the Beltway press locked in on — Congress is dysfunctional, and the Covid relief bill proves it! That preferred storyline is simple to understand and it blames Both Sides for the lack of Congressional action.

Instead of unpacking the two relief bills and highlighting what's so radically different about them — funding for unemployment benefits, child care, state and local governments, and the GOP's obsession with liability protections for corporations, nationwide testing — the press pays attention to the price tag. That leaves news consumers (and Wolf Blitzer) with the false impression that both bills are similar, it's just that the Republican one is slightly smaller.

The media malpractice is worse because there actually is no Republican Covid relief bill. Pelosi and Democrats are getting beat up in the press for not hammering out a deal with Republicans, but Republicans aren't offering a deal.
Yes, the press generated headlines about a $1.8 trillion bill that Trump's White House recently floated. But as soon as the White House proposal was sent to the Hill, Republican senators eviscerated it as too costly.

• “An enormous betrayal” of Republican voters" — Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY)

• "There’s no appetite right now to spend the White House number or the House number" — Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN)

• "I don’t get it" — Senator Rick Scott (R-FL)


It's basically devolved into this:

Media: Why won't Democrats accept GOP's offer?

Democrats: There is no offer.

Media: But why won't Democrats accept it?!


more...

https://pressrun.media/p/both-sides-the-press-keeps-screwing

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Hometown: NY
Home country: US
Current location: Florida
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 09:54 PM
Number of posts: 171,057
Latest Discussions»babylonsister's Journal