Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

kpete's Journal
kpete's Journal
August 22, 2015

I just don't get it:



https://twitter.com/costareports/status/634870138525782016/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw


enlightenment:
On the first day, while God is letting there be light,
Trump is ordering his investment banker to buy up stock in Holiday Inn.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/14/jesus-donald-trump-who-can-tell-the-difference
August 22, 2015

Jeb Bush Super PAC Sends Mailer To 86,000 Iowans With - Jeb’s Head On A Black Body

Don't you think making Jeb! part black is pandering a bit?



Having money is one thing. Spending it wisely is another.

Yesterday, Right To Rise announced they were sending a mailer to 86,000 Iowa households touting Bush’s candidacy.


https://twitter.com/r2rusa/status/634401700346884096/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

A closer examination, however, shows that the flier features Jeb’s head on a black man’s body. In the flier, one of Jeb’s hands appears to belong to a black man.



nice trick? NOT!:
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/08/21/3694173/jeb-bush-super-pac-sends-mailer-to-86000-iowans-with-jebs-head-photoshopped-onto-a-black-body/
August 22, 2015

WORD.

?w=655
August 22, 2015

ISIS? No, REPUBLICANS.....

August 22, 2015

James O'Keefe Tries to Entrap Hillary, Fails Spectacularly

Comes now word from Time Magazine that two women approached the Hillary Clinton campaign in Iowa and tried to entrap campaign officials into breaking the law. Does that sound like the MO of anyone we know? Fortunately, the officials weren't born yesterday, and now the campaign is on guard against future stunts of this nature. And so James O'Keefe can add another entry to the long list of things he's failed at.

From the story:

A Clinton campaign official alleges that the women engaged in several efforts to entrap supporters. In one scheme, described by Clinton staff, a woman attempted to pass a cash donation to Clinton volunteers and interns. In another, a woman approached the campaign on Aug. 19 and said both her parents had donated to Clinton the legal maximum of $2700 each and wanted to funnel an additional donation through their daughter, a violation of federal law. On Aug. 13, a woman claiming to be Canadian approached another Clinton fellow to ask how to falsify an address for a campaign donation.

In another instance, a woman volunteering with the Clinton campaign on voter registration efforts in Iowa City returned to the campaign’s office in Des Moines and asked whether it was okay that she refuse to register people who don’t support Clinton, the campaign official said. The Clinton campaign maintains that its policy is to register all voters, regardless of their preference in candidates.


.........

In an example of the kind of shrewd attention to detail that O'Keefe is famous for,
the phone number given by the women is listed on the website of a University of Minnesota organization called "Students for a Conservative Voice." Oops! Even better, one of the women was subsequently identified as Laura Loomer, a student at Barry University who illegally videotaped a professor earlier this year in what sounds like a fairly pathetic attempt to frame him for supporting ISIS. The university subsequently suspended Loomer, and the professor filed criminal charges against her. One would think that an individual under this kind of legal scrutiny would be well advised to avoid committing additional illegal acts, but you know what they say about the criminal element.

Kudos to Team Hillary for catching these (admittedly incompetent) crooks in the act, and I hope Team Bernie takes note and instructs its offices to be on the lookout for O'Keefe's criminals.

http://time.com/4006454/hillary-clinton-video-project-veritas/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/22/1414399/-James-O-Keefe-Tries-to-Entrap-Hillary-Fails-Spectacularly
August 21, 2015

AZ: THIS is a sticker my son's public high school forced all students to put in their science books

Suzanne Young @suzanne_young
This. THIS is a sticker my son's public high school just forced all students to put in their science books:


Her son, a freshman at Gilbert High School in Gilbert, Arizona, told her that if students didn't put the abstinence-only education sticker in their textbooks, the student would have to speak with their grade-level administrator.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/arizona-gilbert-school-district-abortion-sticker

August 21, 2015

BOGUS! Former Nuclear Safeguards Official Says AP's Iran Deal Document Looks Fake

Former Nuclear Safeguards Official Says AP's Iran Deal Document Looks Fake
It appears aimed at undermining the nuclear deal, the official says.


WASHINGTON -- A veteran international nuclear official questioned the authenticity of a document The Associated Press relied upon for its controversial report that Iran would be allowed to inspect Parchin, a site suspected of hosting illicit nuclear activity over a decade ago. He said the document contains wrong terminology and other signs it may be fake.

Tariq Rauf, the former head of verification and security policy coordination at the International Atomic Energy Agency, told The Huffington Post that a document the AP described as a transcript of a draft agreement between Iran and the IAEA, published on Thursday, appears bogus, designed to undermine the real agreement and the broader nuclear pact negotiated between Iran, the U.S., and five world powers.


...............


Tariq Rauf, who is the former Head of Verification and Security Policy Coordination at the IAEA concludes:

"In my personal view this is not an authentic document, several reasons cited in the notes appended in the margin, and the document is not in the standard legal language used by the IAEA in preparing official documents and agreements with States. Likely a crude attempt to hinder the JCPOA and Road-­‐map – origin of the document could be similar to that of the “Niger Letter” re uranium purchases by Iraq.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/former-nuclear-safeguards-official-says-parchin-document-looks-fake_55d67d53e4b020c386de2f7e?kvcommref=mostpopular


Here, according to Rauf, are the 13 signs that suggest the document is bogus:

"Comment [1]: Iran never calls itself “Islamic
State”
Comment [2]: Normal practice for the IAEA in
official documents, legal agreements, is to refer first
to the IAEA and then (second) to the Contracting
Party – i.e., the International Atomic Energy Agency
and the Islamic Republic of Iran

Comment [3]: Iran refers to itself as the Islamic
Republic of Iran in official documents, not just “Iran”

Comment [4]: Standard IAEA swipe kit contains 6
“swipes” (swipe cloths). Even if 7 sampling points or
locations within the building (purported ‘explosives
chamber’) are meant, this is an arbitrary number?

Comment [5]: Swipes “outside” of Parchin make
little sense – and only 2! Even if 2 sampling points or
locations outside the Parchin military-­‐industrial
facility are meant, this is an arbitrary number?

Comment [6]: Not specified how IAEA would
“ensure technical authenticity”

Comment [7]: This is not standard IAEA language
– there is no “authenticated equipment” for the use
of States relevant for safeguards, monitoring and
verification

Comment [8]: This is not standard IAEA language
– IAEA safeguards equipment is certified by IAEA for
quality/tech specs for IAEA’s own use – any
technical specifications are not shared with States.
Even if IAEA swipe kits are meant, the formulation
of language is strange and not standard IAEA
language.

Comment [9]: Environmental sampling does not
involve “containers and seals” as such – swipes are
sealed in clear plastic pouches/bags – see photos on
my article on www.atomicreporters.com.
Again the language is not standard IAEA language.

Comment [10]: This is not standard IAEA
language – there is no logical rationale for inclusion
of such a paragraph. There is no reason for the IAEA
Director General to make a “public visit” to Iran – he
is not a tourist to make public visit, his visits
normally are for official/technical purposes.

Comment [11]: IAEA organizes technical
meetings, topical meetings, dialogue forums,
topical meetings, experts meetings, symposia -­‐-­‐
“technical roundtable” is not standard IAEA
language

Comment [12]: Correct formal title is: Deputy
Director General, Head of the Department of
Safeguards – this formulation is used by the IAEA in
official agreements and documents. "

"Comment [13]: This is unprecedented – in the
past IAEA has signed agreements with the President
or Vice President of the Atomic Energy Organization
of Iran (AEOI) and with the senior officials of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs – these are “designated
points of contact” (POC) in Iran for the IAEA – the
Supreme National Security Council is not a
designated POC and it is highly unlikely that IAEA
would sign a binding agreement with such a non-­‐
designated entity.
Mr Ali Hosseini Tash is previously associated with
the Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces Logistics
(MODAFL) – Internet search does not bring up Tash
as Deputy Secretary of the SNSC – in fact Wikipedia
page does not list any position as Deputy Secretary
nor Tash."


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/21/1414152/-IAEA-Nuclear-Expert-Says-AP-Iran-Document-Appears-to-be-FORGED
August 21, 2015

Planned Parenthood Set To Sue The Criminals Behind Edited Video Smears

Planned Parenthood is planning swift retribution against the perpetrators of the deplorable and illegal smear campaign that has been leveled against the vital women’s health non-profit by far-right wing anti-abortion extremists. The Center for Medical Progress, which does not employ any medical professionals, arranged a vast fraud by creating a fake biomedical company in order to attempt to “purchase” fetal tissues, secretly recording interviews with Planned Parenthood officials and then editing the footage to mislead and misrepresent the discussion that actually took place.

Planned Parenthood Executive Vice President Dawn Laguens told The Hill that her organization is set to take action against the CMP: “I absolutely do believe that they have violated laws in terms of how they secured these videos… But the fraud is also in how they have presented them and in the editing.”Several of the videos were recorded in California, where it is illegal to record a conversation without the consent of both parties.

Thirteen states have squandered countless tax dollars on “investigating” Planned Parenthood. Not a single one has uncovered any sort of questionable conduct or misuse of materials. The fetal tissue extracted from aborted fetuses is used in critical medical research, attempting to cure deadly diseases like HIV/AIDS.

The right-wing’s vicious smear campaign against women’s rights and healthcare will ultimately amount to naught. President Obama has already threatened to take action against states that cut Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood, which are not used for abortions in anyway. Senate Democrats have already stymied one attempt to cut the group’s federal funding entirely. The polls show that Planned Parenthood is more popular among Americans than every single Republican candidate for president. The American people recognize the incredible work that Planned Parenthood does across the world. The non-profit deserves much better than to be besmirched by religious zealots.


http://linkis.com/occupydemocrats.com/wJzKi
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/251626-planned-parenthood-threatens-legal-action-against-makers-of-videos

August 21, 2015

Benghazi Committee Members May Have Violated Law by Handling Hillary's Classified Email

If she was at fault for having classified information on her server without her knowledge, Mr. Fallon suggested, then aren’t other people in the same boat?

“Just as an aside, for the I.G. to now declare the material as classified, since it was provided by State to the House Benghazi committee earlier this year in unredacted form, presumably that means that members of the House Benghazi committee may have unwittingly handled classified material on unclassified systems within the House of Representatives,” Mr. Fallon said.

“Now, I don’t think that anybody here at the Clinton campaign is going to say that members of, say, Chairman Gowdy’s staff should have their computers confiscated for having possibly trafficked in classified material,” he said. “I don’t think we would say that. But that is, fundamentally, the same logic behind the I.G.’s referral to the State Department with respect to Mrs. Clinton’s server, since she was at worst a passive recipient of unwitting information that subsequently became deemed as classified. Let’s raise that as an aside.”

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/20/spokesman-for-hillary-clinton-offers-new-take-on-email-issue/?_r=0

Profile Information

Member since: Fri Sep 17, 2004, 03:59 PM
Number of posts: 72,014
Latest Discussions»kpete's Journal