Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
sibelian
sibelian's Journal
sibelian's Journal
August 12, 2015
Then, eventually, that's it. I AM your enemy, whether I like it or not.
I can attempt to persuade you otherwise, but if my attempts to persuade you otherwise are used by you to continue to persuade yourself of your original decision (and it is your decision), there is, in the end, nothing I can do.
That's how enmity works.
"You hate me!"
"No, I really don't."
"You're arguing with me! That means you hate me!"
Has there ever been a process more farcically manipulative and self-perpetuating?
If you decide I am your enemy....
Then, eventually, that's it. I AM your enemy, whether I like it or not.
I can attempt to persuade you otherwise, but if my attempts to persuade you otherwise are used by you to continue to persuade yourself of your original decision (and it is your decision), there is, in the end, nothing I can do.
That's how enmity works.
"You hate me!"
"No, I really don't."
"You're arguing with me! That means you hate me!"
Has there ever been a process more farcically manipulative and self-perpetuating?
August 10, 2015
Bullies will make up anything.
They will convince themselves and as many other sidekicks as they can muster of anything they can that gives them the permission to abandon responsibility for managing their emotions appropriately and pretending it's someone else's fault.
There isn't a word coming out of them about their victims that they truly believe. Even if they did truly believe any of it, they wouldn't truly care. They don't need to believe it, or care, they just need to say it. So that they can hear themselves say it. So that they can be the kind of person who is allowed to say things like that. It's all about them.
That's why they hang around in groups. They need loud support, strength in numbers. They haven't the faith in their own statements sufficient to give them the stamina to continue with their campaigns alone. There's no end goal in sight for them, it's the process itself that they need. The process can be shortened by simply wasting their opponent's time on endless defense and that can be achieved by dividing the work of attack among a group of perpetrators.
It is not necessarily a good idea to respond in terms of the content of their statements. Typically they pick subjects that are inherently nebulous or founded in clouds of vaguely related perceptions rather than facts.
When bullies mature and have mastered their skills, courtesy becomes one of ther favourite weapons. They house an imaginary audience applausing their restraint. All in the bully group house this audience and play the role of the audience member when necessary.
Many adult bullies specialise in subtle mechanisms consisting of sidelong suggestion rather than outright attack. This is highly effective in engendering frustrated responses which can be easily characterised as tendentious.
Bullying is not about the victim. Bullying is about the bully.
Bullies will make up anything.
They will convince themselves and as many other sidekicks as they can muster of anything they can that gives them the permission to abandon responsibility for managing their emotions appropriately and pretending it's someone else's fault.
There isn't a word coming out of them about their victims that they truly believe. Even if they did truly believe any of it, they wouldn't truly care. They don't need to believe it, or care, they just need to say it. So that they can hear themselves say it. So that they can be the kind of person who is allowed to say things like that. It's all about them.
That's why they hang around in groups. They need loud support, strength in numbers. They haven't the faith in their own statements sufficient to give them the stamina to continue with their campaigns alone. There's no end goal in sight for them, it's the process itself that they need. The process can be shortened by simply wasting their opponent's time on endless defense and that can be achieved by dividing the work of attack among a group of perpetrators.
It is not necessarily a good idea to respond in terms of the content of their statements. Typically they pick subjects that are inherently nebulous or founded in clouds of vaguely related perceptions rather than facts.
When bullies mature and have mastered their skills, courtesy becomes one of ther favourite weapons. They house an imaginary audience applausing their restraint. All in the bully group house this audience and play the role of the audience member when necessary.
Many adult bullies specialise in subtle mechanisms consisting of sidelong suggestion rather than outright attack. This is highly effective in engendering frustrated responses which can be easily characterised as tendentious.
April 13, 2015
First Minister of Scotland, party - Scottish National Party (currently being compared to racist orgnisations in the UK and the EU on a regular basis in comment sections all over the UK press). Tney've been in power in Holyrood (Scottih Parliament) for some time now. Incredibly, they are MORE popular now than on the date of their last Scottish election victory.
. Gender balanced her cabinet
. Wants to end austerity
. Recently released policy on maximising economic opportunities for women
. Wants rid of Trident (UK's nukes)
. Wants to focus healthcare on prevention rather than treatment (studies have shown that this leads to longer . lives and higher quality of life as well as saving money)
. Wants internal investment in infrastructure to improve employment rather than relying on zero hour . contracts and bullshit McJobs to massage the figures
. Wants to increase immigration as immigrants are a net benefit to the economy
. Wants to increase the minimum wage
.. and so on.
Currently polling at around 50% in Scotland. Nearest competitor is Jim Murphy's party on 26%.
(I don't get to vote for her personally, I hasten to add. I'll be voting for her candidate in my constituency)
So, there you go. I GET to vote for people like that in my country. Don't you think it woud be good if you guys got to vote for someone like that in the US, my DU friends?
It is predicted that on 7th May Ms Sturgeon's party will be holding a sizeable proportion of seats in Scotland.
(BTW, Nicola doesn't have a logo)
(Also BTW, I'm not trolling or "boasting" or something. I just think it would be good if you guys saw that tiny insiginificant nations like my cuddly little country, Scotland, seem to be getting a better deal.)
Well, I know who I'll be voting for. NICOLA STURGEON...
First Minister of Scotland, party - Scottish National Party (currently being compared to racist orgnisations in the UK and the EU on a regular basis in comment sections all over the UK press). Tney've been in power in Holyrood (Scottih Parliament) for some time now. Incredibly, they are MORE popular now than on the date of their last Scottish election victory.
. Gender balanced her cabinet
. Wants to end austerity
. Recently released policy on maximising economic opportunities for women
. Wants rid of Trident (UK's nukes)
. Wants to focus healthcare on prevention rather than treatment (studies have shown that this leads to longer . lives and higher quality of life as well as saving money)
. Wants internal investment in infrastructure to improve employment rather than relying on zero hour . contracts and bullshit McJobs to massage the figures
. Wants to increase immigration as immigrants are a net benefit to the economy
. Wants to increase the minimum wage
.. and so on.
Currently polling at around 50% in Scotland. Nearest competitor is Jim Murphy's party on 26%.
(I don't get to vote for her personally, I hasten to add. I'll be voting for her candidate in my constituency)
So, there you go. I GET to vote for people like that in my country. Don't you think it woud be good if you guys got to vote for someone like that in the US, my DU friends?
It is predicted that on 7th May Ms Sturgeon's party will be holding a sizeable proportion of seats in Scotland.
(BTW, Nicola doesn't have a logo)
(Also BTW, I'm not trolling or "boasting" or something. I just think it would be good if you guys saw that tiny insiginificant nations like my cuddly little country, Scotland, seem to be getting a better deal.)
March 22, 2015
And that's the truth.
I can't, I live in Scotland.
Well, I'm NEVER EVER voting for Hilary Clinton EVER.
And that's the truth.
I can't, I live in Scotland.
March 22, 2015
I think this is a good idea.
(I don't know whether or not you guys knew this. It's from November, so I'm sorry if you already knew).
Anyway. I didn't know whether or not to post this as it seems likely to draw the obvious arguments.... but I thought it would be a good idea to show that this kind of thing can in fact be done.
Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Holyrood, the Scottish Government, GENDER BALANCED her cabinet.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/nov/21/nicola-sturgeon-scottish-cabinet-equal-gender-balance#commentsScotland’s first female first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, has announced a new cabinet with a 50/50 gender balance, after pledging to put equality at the heart of government.
Announcing the full lineup at Bute House in Edinburgh on Friday lunchtime, Sturgeon said her cabinet was “a clear demonstration that this government will work hard in all areas to promote women, to create gender equality and it sends out a strong message that the business of redressing the gender balance in public life starts right here in government”. Of Sturgeon’s cabinet of nine secretaries as well as herself, five are women.
Sturgeon began her reshuffle by tweeting a selfie with John Swinney, her new deputy first minister. Swinney, who had been widely tipped for the role, is one of Holyrood’s most experienced frontbenchers and has previously served as finance minister for seven years, a position he will continue to hold.
Announcing the full lineup at Bute House in Edinburgh on Friday lunchtime, Sturgeon said her cabinet was “a clear demonstration that this government will work hard in all areas to promote women, to create gender equality and it sends out a strong message that the business of redressing the gender balance in public life starts right here in government”. Of Sturgeon’s cabinet of nine secretaries as well as herself, five are women.
Sturgeon began her reshuffle by tweeting a selfie with John Swinney, her new deputy first minister. Swinney, who had been widely tipped for the role, is one of Holyrood’s most experienced frontbenchers and has previously served as finance minister for seven years, a position he will continue to hold.
I think this is a good idea.
(I don't know whether or not you guys knew this. It's from November, so I'm sorry if you already knew).
Anyway. I didn't know whether or not to post this as it seems likely to draw the obvious arguments.... but I thought it would be a good idea to show that this kind of thing can in fact be done.
March 21, 2015
No. You don't, do you?
Sigh.
Well, never mind.
No, no, it's fine. Don't worry about it. It's fine. I'm sure you have more important things to concern yourselves with.
I guess I'll just... take the course myself.
Say, you guys! Do any of you want to attend a course on managing passive aggressive behaviour?
No. You don't, do you?
Sigh.
Well, never mind.
No, no, it's fine. Don't worry about it. It's fine. I'm sure you have more important things to concern yourselves with.
I guess I'll just... take the course myself.
March 16, 2015
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/international/people-seeing-putin-everywhere-2015031696282
People seeing Putin everywhere
VLADIMIR Putin sightings have surged in the last 48 hours.
After the Russian president disappeared, witnesses claim to have seen him selling DVDs from a van in Carlisle, married to a voodoo princess in New Orleans and organising penguins near the UK Antarctic Research Centre.
Putinologist Wayne Hayes said: “The Putin is a cipher, a construct of our subconscious, representing our innate desire for sexual experimentation.
After the Russian president disappeared, witnesses claim to have seen him selling DVDs from a van in Carlisle, married to a voodoo princess in New Orleans and organising penguins near the UK Antarctic Research Centre.
Putinologist Wayne Hayes said: “The Putin is a cipher, a construct of our subconscious, representing our innate desire for sexual experimentation.
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/international/people-seeing-putin-everywhere-2015031696282
March 16, 2015
http://news.sky.com/story/1446196/ikea-bans-hide-and-seek-in-stores-report
Ikea Bans Hide-And-Seek In Stores - Report
Thousands were set to take part in the events at a number of stores, but they have reportedly been stopped for safety reasons.
Ikea has reportedly banned thousands of people from playing hide-and-seek in its stores in the Netherlands.
The retailer has stopped several events at Dutch stores for safety reasons after thousands took part in the children's game at a store in Belgium last summer, Bloomberg reports.
Ikea Group spokeswoman Martina Smedberg is quoted by the news organisation as saying: "It's hard to control.
http://news.sky.com/story/1446196/ikea-bans-hide-and-seek-in-stores-report
February 24, 2015
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/24/chicago-police-detain-americans-black-site
Reports of Black sites on US soil - Chicago police detain Americans
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/24/chicago-police-detain-americans-black-site
The Chicago police department operates an off-the-books interrogation compound, rendering Americans unable to be found by family or attorneys while locked inside what lawyers say is the domestic equivalent of a CIA black site.
The facility, a nondescript warehouse on Chicago’s west side known as Homan Square, has long been the scene of secretive work by special police units. Interviews with local attorneys and one protester who spent the better part of a day shackled in Homan Square describe operations that deny access to basic constitutional rights.
The facility, a nondescript warehouse on Chicago’s west side known as Homan Square, has long been the scene of secretive work by special police units. Interviews with local attorneys and one protester who spent the better part of a day shackled in Homan Square describe operations that deny access to basic constitutional rights.
February 19, 2015
So. There you are. That's how hopey he ACTUALLY is.
I would like to ask you all something.
See when someone comes out and does something superficially liberal like take photographs of themselves next to disabled people?
Like this:
Pope Francis stops motorcade to bless disabled girl
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/the-pope/10922181/Pope-Francis-stops-motorcade-to-bless-disabled-girl.html
Do you think that means that they are actually liberal or is it just a photograph?
If you photograph someone who says they are liberal, or wishes to portray themselves as liberal, next to some liberal stuff and then they go off and do something that is very obviously NOT liberal, what criteria do you use to decide whether or not they are liberal? What they look like in photographs, or what they do?
I think there is space and time for a wider discussion on these engaging topics.
Hopey Popey compares trans people to nukes.
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/pope-francis-compares-trans-people-nuclear-weapons190215The head of the Catholic Church has claimed people who 'manipulate' their bodies are similar to 'Herods' that
'destroy, that plot designs of death, that disfigure the face of man and woman, destroying creation.'
The comments were made in a new book published in Italy, Pope Francis: This Economy Kills, calling on Christians to safeguard God's order of creation.
'Let's think of the nuclear arms, of the possibility to annihilate in a few instants a very high number of human beings,' he says.
'destroy, that plot designs of death, that disfigure the face of man and woman, destroying creation.'
The comments were made in a new book published in Italy, Pope Francis: This Economy Kills, calling on Christians to safeguard God's order of creation.
'Let's think of the nuclear arms, of the possibility to annihilate in a few instants a very high number of human beings,' he says.
So. There you are. That's how hopey he ACTUALLY is.
I would like to ask you all something.
See when someone comes out and does something superficially liberal like take photographs of themselves next to disabled people?
Like this:
Pope Francis stops motorcade to bless disabled girl
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/the-pope/10922181/Pope-Francis-stops-motorcade-to-bless-disabled-girl.html
Do you think that means that they are actually liberal or is it just a photograph?
If you photograph someone who says they are liberal, or wishes to portray themselves as liberal, next to some liberal stuff and then they go off and do something that is very obviously NOT liberal, what criteria do you use to decide whether or not they are liberal? What they look like in photographs, or what they do?
I think there is space and time for a wider discussion on these engaging topics.
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Sep 4, 2007, 07:36 AMNumber of posts: 7,804
