Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

unblock

(52,351 posts)

3. The military cant be used domestically

Reply to Ohioboy (Original post)

Mon Feb 19, 2018, 09:39 PM

Feb 2018

And for some reason they think a tyrannical government will go down in defeat by a handful of yahoos with a few assault rifles rather than violate that sacred rule.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this a dumb question, or is there a real contradiction here? [View all] Ohioboy Feb 2018 OP

They intend to use them to kill all the libruls Voltaire2 Feb 2018 #1

The 2nd Amendment was really aimed at building a militia, not owning a personal arsenal liberal N proud Feb 2018 #2

Their argument is that the original intent of the first part of the 2nd amendment was unblock Feb 2018 #4

The military cant be used domestically unblock Feb 2018 #3

They have failed to understand that no matter Phoenix61 Feb 2018 #5

Why, then, hasn't our military taken control of Afghanistan? friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #6

What exactly does that have to do with Phoenix61 Feb 2018 #7

The Taliban never had *any* tanks or planes-- but they're still there, and still a threat friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #8

You make an interesting point. However Ohioboy Feb 2018 #12

The same people endorse free speech but want us to STFU Generic Brad Feb 2018 #9

Military, ex military, paramilitary and those from overbearing households embrace fascism more. TheBlackAdder Feb 2018 #10

Why do you think that such a conflict would be symmetrical? X_Digger Feb 2018 #11