Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Michael Avenatti with another great idea: [View all]
Link to tweet
This is why GOP think tanks and their internet trolls hate him.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
63 replies, 10673 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (154)
ReplyReply to this post
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pass laws with jail terms for suppression of the vote, gerrymandering, registration, etc.
olegramps
Oct 2018
#53
As pointed out elsewhere in this thread, having a SSN doesn't automatically mean
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2018
#34
His idea of controlling state election registration requirements from the federal level would not
Trust Buster
Oct 2018
#4
Not necessarily. Congress can, and has, passed legislation relating to elections.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2018
#9
Social Security data? A federal birth registry is very unlikely ever to be created.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2018
#17
We will not have 60 Senate votes to pass it into law even if we have a President that wouldn't veto.
Trust Buster
Oct 2018
#15
The 60-vote rule is for ending debate (cloture), not to pass a bill in the Senate.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2018
#35
You never know HOW many D or R members will be in a future Senate. COULD be 60 Dems,
7962
Oct 2018
#40
Bold SANE moves . . . it's no long the time for "incremental", GOP doesn't do incremental
pdsimdars
Oct 2018
#19
He's a lawyer; he probably knows this stuff - but he's also a publicity hound
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2018
#48
I know that very well - I retired from that line of work some years ago.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2018
#62
We should push for a constitutional amendment for mandatory voter registration
blue-wave
Oct 2018
#47