Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If I was impregnated due to rape, I have been told I need to get over it that a Dem Governor may [View all]JI7
(89,289 posts)33. maybe im thinking of the Obamacare/aca thing
there was something where Roberts voted with the liberal leaning justices.
but either way the liberal leaning side would still have had more justices with mm refusing to confirm.
my point is peoples attempts to claim no difference is bs.
part is being in power is just about preventing shitty things from happening .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If I was impregnated due to rape, I have been told I need to get over it that a Dem Governor may [View all]
Celerity
May 2019
OP
one trick pony, we all hate Stein, that has fuckall to do with the Dem Gov signing the bill
Celerity
May 2019
#22
it has everything to do with jill Stein attacking Democrats who would protect women's rights
JI7
May 2019
#23
Jill Stein does NOT make it ok for a Democratic Governor to enslave us to our biological make-up!
Celerity
May 2019
#14
nope, bel Edwards ran as anti choice. we knew louisiana and other right wing states
JI7
May 2019
#24
It seems that according to some here, every woman unfortunate enough to be living
bullwinkle428
May 2019
#13
Bel Edwards would STILL sign that fucking bill, probably even more likely as HE would then
Celerity
May 2019
#21