Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice Department lawyers may soon pay a high price for lying to the courts [View all]Gothmog
(145,168 posts)49. Sometimes a Justice Department lawyer must just say 'no'
From the Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/08/somtimes-doj-lawyer-must-just-say-no/?utm_term=.8047534f232a
Mimi Rocah, a former prosecutor, surmises: There are DOJ lawyers not willing to lose their integrity with the courts for Trump. Im proud to see that. And judges will notice too.
Others agree that swapping out lawyers is highly unusual. Its extraordinary and downright bizarre to see the government parachute in new lawyers at this late stage of the litigation, says legal scholar Joshua Matz. If past is prologue, this may indicate that were about to see some extremely sketchy moves that the existing team was unwilling to take for professional or reputational reasons. That the administration would have to go so far afield, to recruit consumer protection lawyers, suggests that the entire federal programs branch of the Justice Department is unwilling to defend whatever the administration plans to file.
This is not the first time in this presidency a set of lawyers has dropped out of a case brought on specious grounds. In the case seeking to invalidate the entire Affordable Care Act, three career attorneys withdrew without signing onto a brief many considered legally preposterous.....
Not to put too fine a point on it, but what these lawyers do will have profound consequences for the country and their careers. Constitutional scholar Larry Tribe warns, The Department of Justice cannot avoid the long-term credibility cost to its litigating posture of contradicting itself in successive filings simply by changing the names of the career DOJ lawyers on the pleadings or by bringing new faces into court. If thats the aspiration, its not going to succeed.
The new team of lawyers should think very carefully before accepting an assignment from an attorney general not above misrepresenting the work of a special counsel or adopting the role of the presidents private counsel.
Others agree that swapping out lawyers is highly unusual. Its extraordinary and downright bizarre to see the government parachute in new lawyers at this late stage of the litigation, says legal scholar Joshua Matz. If past is prologue, this may indicate that were about to see some extremely sketchy moves that the existing team was unwilling to take for professional or reputational reasons. That the administration would have to go so far afield, to recruit consumer protection lawyers, suggests that the entire federal programs branch of the Justice Department is unwilling to defend whatever the administration plans to file.
This is not the first time in this presidency a set of lawyers has dropped out of a case brought on specious grounds. In the case seeking to invalidate the entire Affordable Care Act, three career attorneys withdrew without signing onto a brief many considered legally preposterous.....
Not to put too fine a point on it, but what these lawyers do will have profound consequences for the country and their careers. Constitutional scholar Larry Tribe warns, The Department of Justice cannot avoid the long-term credibility cost to its litigating posture of contradicting itself in successive filings simply by changing the names of the career DOJ lawyers on the pleadings or by bringing new faces into court. If thats the aspiration, its not going to succeed.
The new team of lawyers should think very carefully before accepting an assignment from an attorney general not above misrepresenting the work of a special counsel or adopting the role of the presidents private counsel.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Justice Department lawyers may soon pay a high price for lying to the courts [View all]
Fritz Walter
Jul 2019
OP
I Don't Know and I Don't Want To Know, It Would Be Worse Than Now, And That's Hard to Imagine
Skraxx
Jul 2019
#53
Yes they do. For those who haven't yet, please set up a monthly donation plan with them.
TheBlackAdder
Jul 2019
#14
Awesome! It can be small, just to get in the groove, say $5/month. Then increase when ready.
TheBlackAdder
Jul 2019
#22
Laudable effort by the ACLU but in effect we're back to where we were after the Mueller Report
pecosbob
Jul 2019
#16
Anyone know what Bar oversees these attorneys and wtf aren't there complaints against them.
Thomas Hurt
Jul 2019
#27
"'Estoppel' doctrines" It sounds like what the average Republican breaks every day Trump especially
LiberalLovinLug
Jul 2019
#38