Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(145,168 posts)
49. Sometimes a Justice Department lawyer must just say 'no'
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 03:57 PM
Jul 2019

From the Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/07/08/somtimes-doj-lawyer-must-just-say-no/?utm_term=.8047534f232a

Mimi Rocah, a former prosecutor, surmises: “There are DOJ lawyers not willing to lose their integrity with the courts for Trump. I’m proud to see that. And judges will notice too.”

Others agree that swapping out lawyers is highly unusual. “It’s extraordinary and downright bizarre to see the government parachute in new lawyers at this late stage of the litigation,” says legal scholar Joshua Matz. “If past is prologue, this may indicate that we’re about to see some extremely sketchy moves that the existing team was unwilling to take for professional or reputational reasons.” That the administration would have to go so far afield, to recruit consumer protection lawyers, “suggests that the entire federal programs branch of the Justice Department is unwilling to defend whatever the administration plans to file.”

This is not the first time in this presidency a set of lawyers has dropped out of a case brought on specious grounds. In the case seeking to invalidate the entire Affordable Care Act, three career attorneys withdrew without signing onto a brief many considered legally preposterous.....

Not to put too fine a point on it, but what these lawyers do will have profound consequences for the country and their careers. Constitutional scholar Larry Tribe warns, “The Department of Justice cannot avoid the long-term credibility cost to its litigating posture of contradicting itself in successive filings simply by changing the names of the career DOJ lawyers on the pleadings or by bringing new faces into court. If that’s the aspiration, it’s not going to succeed.”

The new team of lawyers should think very carefully before accepting an assignment from an attorney general not above misrepresenting the work of a special counsel or adopting the role of the president’s private counsel.
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jul 2019 #1
ACLU Has THE BEST Lawyers, for real, vs Trumps Clown Car Skraxx Jul 2019 #2
Where would we be without ACLU? bucolic_frolic Jul 2019 #11
I Don't Know and I Don't Want To Know, It Would Be Worse Than Now, And That's Hard to Imagine Skraxx Jul 2019 #53
Yes they do. For those who haven't yet, please set up a monthly donation plan with them. TheBlackAdder Jul 2019 #14
I promise: I will donate. Fritz Walter Jul 2019 #20
Awesome! It can be small, just to get in the groove, say $5/month. Then increase when ready. TheBlackAdder Jul 2019 #22
I'm a longtime donor. :). nt trev Jul 2019 #34
Yes!! EVERYONE DO THIS PLEASE!!! Skraxx Jul 2019 #52
k&r TeamPooka Jul 2019 #3
This is a VERY important story StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #4
K&R Scurrilous Jul 2019 #5
I just hope we don't get unjust rulings from biased Rethug-appointed judges Martin Eden Jul 2019 #6
Judge Hazel's ruling the other day was a smack down to Twitler's case Roland99 Jul 2019 #7
Smackdown in deed K&R onetexan Jul 2019 #10
K & R for visibility .... n/t MFGsunny Jul 2019 #8
The things I learn on DU! gristy Jul 2019 #9
Didn't Roberts basically tell them to go back and dream up another reason? Ligyron Jul 2019 #21
That should be a requirement for any Trump related suits. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2019 #39
Yep. I learned that for the first time, too. calimary Jul 2019 #43
The ACLU has better lawyers than DOJ. sinkingfeeling Jul 2019 #12
maybe or maybe not dsc Jul 2019 #30
K&R smirkymonkey Jul 2019 #13
One can plead alternative theories but not alternative facts Ponietz Jul 2019 #15
Laudable effort by the ACLU but in effect we're back to where we were after the Mueller Report pecosbob Jul 2019 #16
The GOP calls it "creating our own reality" and it wins some elections. KY_EnviroGuy Jul 2019 #23
O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive! yortsed snacilbuper Jul 2019 #17
This is BIG! I believe the federal judiciary will support this 100% FakeNoose Jul 2019 #18
YES elleng Jul 2019 #33
Well, let's hope so. calimary Jul 2019 #44
recommended to publicize real Cannabis calm Jul 2019 #19
Bill Barr's No-Justice Department BlueIdaho Jul 2019 #24
Great post. Thanks for link, judicial estoppel info.;ACLU has been RestoreAmerica2020 Jul 2019 #25
Thank you for posting perdita9 Jul 2019 #26
Anyone know what Bar oversees these attorneys and wtf aren't there complaints against them. Thomas Hurt Jul 2019 #27
States by which they've been admitted to practice 'oversee.' elleng Jul 2019 #32
k & r n/t They_Live Jul 2019 #28
K&R onecaliberal Jul 2019 #29
EXCELLENT! elleng Jul 2019 #31
I have hope the the Supreme Court Justices will be just pissed enough Delmette2.0 Jul 2019 #35
Courts hate it when lawyers lie in open court proceedings Gothmog Jul 2019 #36
Their big shit wheel is slowly being ground to a stop. marble falls Jul 2019 #37
"'Estoppel' doctrines" It sounds like what the average Republican breaks every day Trump especially LiberalLovinLug Jul 2019 #38
today is a good day to donate to the ACLU.. Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #40
K&R Sherman A1 Jul 2019 #41
The ACLU fights for everyone. Please donate today. nt Hotler Jul 2019 #42
Automatic donation every month... RobertDevereaux Jul 2019 #45
From Prof. Tribe Gothmog Jul 2019 #46
I stand with the ACLU. saidsimplesimon Jul 2019 #47
Washington Post-Opinion: Trump's corruption is getting worse. Gothmog Jul 2019 #48
So, when rats desert a sinking ship, they bring on more rats? Fritz Walter Jul 2019 #50
Sometimes a Justice Department lawyer must just say 'no' Gothmog Jul 2019 #49
These attorneys may not be allowed to withdraw Gothmog Jul 2019 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Department lawyer...»Reply #49