Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: AOC Tweet on Amazon. [View all]lapucelle
(18,252 posts)51. So were Queens and Bronx residents.
New Poll Finds Queens Residents Support Amazon in Long Island City
Dec. 5, 2018 By Nathaly Pesantez
A new poll has found that Queens residents approve of Amazon building new headquarters in Long Island Cityin stark contrast to the backlash and anti-Amazon rhetoric expressed by many borough officials and groups over the plan.
The Quinnipiac University Poll released today shows that Queens residents are not only for the tech giant locating its headquarters at Anable Basin, but approve of the billions in incentives it is set to receive from the city and state for the move.
The poll found that 60 percent of Queens voters approve of Amazon locating one of its new headquarters in Long Island City, compared to just 26 percent of voters who oppose the tech giants presence.
Queens voters, furthermore, support the $3 billion in state and city incentives Amazon is set to receive as part of its deal to locate to Queens, with 55 percent in approval compared to the 39 percent of voters that oppose the incentives package.
The poll also reveals Queens to be the borough most in support of the city and states incentive package to Amazon, followed by the Bronx.
Dec. 5, 2018 By Nathaly Pesantez
A new poll has found that Queens residents approve of Amazon building new headquarters in Long Island Cityin stark contrast to the backlash and anti-Amazon rhetoric expressed by many borough officials and groups over the plan.
The Quinnipiac University Poll released today shows that Queens residents are not only for the tech giant locating its headquarters at Anable Basin, but approve of the billions in incentives it is set to receive from the city and state for the move.
The poll found that 60 percent of Queens voters approve of Amazon locating one of its new headquarters in Long Island City, compared to just 26 percent of voters who oppose the tech giants presence.
Queens voters, furthermore, support the $3 billion in state and city incentives Amazon is set to receive as part of its deal to locate to Queens, with 55 percent in approval compared to the 39 percent of voters that oppose the incentives package.
The poll also reveals Queens to be the borough most in support of the city and states incentive package to Amazon, followed by the Bronx.
https://licpost.com/new-poll-finds-queens-residents-support-amazon-in-long-island-city
The Amazon boycott may have played well to a national audience (as well as to donors who do not live in NY-14), but it did not play well to the constituents who elected the congresswoman to represent them.
It seems extremely disingenuous to broadcast via Twitter that Amazon, (by continuing with its long standing plan to expand it's rental of high-end rental space in Manhattan as Amazon) "quietly came into NY", as if they had changed their minds about building their headquarters in LIC.
From the WSJ story that the subtweet links to "prove" the misleading claim:
Amazons abrupt reversal sent shock waves through the New York real estate community, with some suggesting that the companys decision to bolt could discourage other major tech companies from considering the city.
Instead, interest among social media, e-commerce and ride-hailing companies has been intensifying. Many of these companies are willing to spend big dollars renting high-end Manhattan real estate, rather than the older office stock in Queens that Amazon was prepared to lease.
Instead, interest among social media, e-commerce and ride-hailing companies has been intensifying. Many of these companies are willing to spend big dollars renting high-end Manhattan real estate, rather than the older office stock in Queens that Amazon was prepared to lease.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-city-real-estate-savors-a-tech-boom-11562760760?shareToken=ste2a897e466444a5ea419de5ce3c6b9d6&reflink=share_mobilewebshare
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"I will never believe that the American taxpayer should subsidize any companies expansion."
Perseus
Jul 2019
#6
If a corporation can't afford to expand on their own dime they shouldn't expand.
Autumn
Jul 2019
#14
If it benefits people, as hospitals do or if it's a grant for research to develop more
Autumn
Jul 2019
#45
Amazon was playing the jobs angle, when they plan to fully automate that facility in 2 years.
TheBlackAdder
Jul 2019
#11
Re-framing a premise into something false is never a good look for a poster.
LanternWaste
Jul 2019
#59
I don't care what anyone says about her; AOC is still smarter than 99% of the men in DC and...
JoeOtterbein
Jul 2019
#13
This is for new OFFICE space in Manhattan, and it's going to employ many thousands less...
George II
Jul 2019
#16
This expanded office space in Manhattan was already in the works, this isn't something new....
George II
Jul 2019
#22
I suggest you look into what the "deal" was for Amazon from both New York State and City....
George II
Jul 2019
#24
Thanks appreciate that! Amazon establishing their HQ2 in Queens would have been a huge boon...
George II
Jul 2019
#34
If you looked into the deal in NYC, you would know that it's nothing like the one in Seattle. Next?
George II
Jul 2019
#46
Amazon was never handed "cap free cash". As I've said a number of times, READ the deal!
George II
Jul 2019
#52
Yes, they chose not to. That's what makes the "quietly came to NY" reference particularly odd.
lapucelle
Jul 2019
#56
The Foxconn deal was nothing close to the Amazon deal. There were virtually zero tax exposure...
George II
Jul 2019
#39
Amazon's "subsidies" (which they weren't) were based on performance, completely different than....
George II
Jul 2019
#30