Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

duforsure

(11,885 posts)

2. Wouldn't that be up to the presiding judge?

Reply to Mike Nelson (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 2, 2020, 10:33 AM

Feb 2020

Especially now that numerous people involved with the trail (maybe including Roberts if trump tried to threaten, bribe or influence him in any way)have been exposed by Parnas of being part of this all along and not disclosing their involvement, or for not recusing themselves knowing this trial was corrupted

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could the Democrats now call for a mistrial? [View all] duforsure Feb 2020 OP

I don't think so... Mike Nelson Feb 2020 #1

Wouldn't that be up to the presiding judge? duforsure Feb 2020 #2

No. The Senate makes its own rules. MineralMan Feb 2020 #3