Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
9. If it turns out as we fear, the fault won't lie with Nate or any of the other correlating sites...
Tue Nov 3, 2020, 11:02 PM
Nov 2020

They deserve fault for 2016, because they took what was a close race with polling going in different directions, and put together the big picture wrong.

This time, the issue would be that the polls were quite clear-cut and virtually all in agreement, and all would have had to turned out to be drastically wrong.

If 45 wins again, the ones needing to take a long, hard look at themselves are the polling organizations, who seem to have all been off-base. If the raw data you're given is wrong, then it doesn't matter how you combine it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Interesting tidbit from N...»Reply #9