Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jeffrey Toobin is a special kind of moron [View all]hlthe2b
(102,263 posts)13. Let's see the responses from his own former legal Prof, Laurence Tribe, Barb Quade and others
Laurence Tribe
@tribelaw
.@JeffreyToobin
says AG Garland shouldnt even investigate Trumps role in the seditious insurrection because the leading precedent comes from a case from 1863! Hmmm. Could that maybe be because. . . wait for it: This is the first insurrection weve had since the Civil War?
@tribelaw
.@JeffreyToobin
says AG Garland shouldnt even investigate Trumps role in the seditious insurrection because the leading precedent comes from a case from 1863! Hmmm. Could that maybe be because. . . wait for it: This is the first insurrection weve had since the Civil War?
Link to tweet
Barb McQuade
Could not disagree more. This assumes intent cannot be proven if someone lies about his own. No other criminals get that kind of pass. Trump shouldnt, either. Theres more than enough predication to investigate and a substantial federal interest in protecting election
Could not disagree more. This assumes intent cannot be proven if someone lies about his own. No other criminals get that kind of pass. Trump shouldnt, either. Theres more than enough predication to investigate and a substantial federal interest in protecting election
Link to tweet
Joyce Vance:
Toobin makes the remarkably wrong claim that based on the available evidence, there is no basis to prosecute Trump & little reason to investigate. Of course, he doesnt know all of the evidence DOJ possesses & little reason is enough to investigate.
Toobin makes the remarkably wrong claim that based on the available evidence, there is no basis to prosecute Trump & little reason to investigate. Of course, he doesnt know all of the evidence DOJ possesses & little reason is enough to investigate.
Link to tweet
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I venture to say that most, if not all women, are smart enough and have enough...
3catwoman3
Aug 2021
#24
A woman can't breastfeed her infant in public because she might offend the assholes of the world
zuul
Aug 2021
#25
Let's see the responses from his own former legal Prof, Laurence Tribe, Barb Quade and others
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#13
Much as I hate the idea that he's right ... he probably is, at least in the outcome
Hugh_Lebowski
Aug 2021
#15
You think a self-promoting public-masturbating has-been knows more about law than Tribe, Quade
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#18
Read more closely and you'll find I'm not actually disagreeing with those people
Hugh_Lebowski
Aug 2021
#35