Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
31. While most of your post is a nice read, I just can't let those last 2 paragraphs go unanswered.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 01:46 PM
Nov 2012

First, the Mayans. They and their calendar predict no such thing as the end of the world. It measures time in periods, just as ours does. Or the Jewish or Islamic calendars do. Or the Chinese calendar. The Mayan calendar just has much larger periods it can count. This cockamamy nonsense about it predicting the end of the world stems from some idiot mid-century looking to cash in on bad archeology and crackpot theories. Oh, and someone FINALLY got around to asking actual Mayans what they thought about their ancestors' calendar predicting the end of the world. The Mayans were a bit perplexed how someone could think it predicted any such thing. Again, it's a calendar. One that can also measure really long periods. That's it. That's all it does.

Second, the 26,000 year thing. That's called precession. The Earth is doing it right now. Every second, of every day, of every year. Have you ever spun a top? Besides its obvious spin, see that little wobble it does about its spin axis? That's precession and that's what the Earth does, but much much slower. 26,000 years to complete one cycle. Star charts have to be updated every 50 years because of it. While Polaris is our current north star, in 13,000 years Vega will claim that title as the precession of Earth's rotational axis slowly swings around. There will be many "north stars" along the way between Polaris and Vega and back again, but those 2 are currently the brightest along that circular path. Remember too, stars are not stationary either so eventually both Polaris and Vega will cease ever being our north stars and other stars will take their place.

Third, you hadn't mentioned it but it's another misconception that gets mixed in with Mayans and precession that grinds my gears, the Earth's magnetosphere. It goes through somewhat less predictable cycles, though we can see past cycles by measuring magnetic footprints in the rocks out by the Mid-Atlantic Ridge as the North American and European plates are pushed apart. The Earth is not going to lose its magnetosphere, the field simply weakens and becomes multipolar as a result. Instead of a magnetic north pole and a magnetic south pole, we get multiple magnetic poles. This lasts for a time until the magnetic field reorganizes itself, as it always has, and returns to a bipolar state though reversed from its previous state. Magnetic poles are NOT the same thing as rotational poles. Earth will NOT flip around, the crust will NOT shudder and break, Sol will NOT bake us alive. A weakened magnetosphere simply allows more high energy particles to reach the Earth's surface. You'll see an uptick in cancers, more electric grid failures during solar storms, and that's about it. Oh, and your magnetic compass will be utterly useless too as it won't point towards THE magnetic north pole, it'll just point at the nearest one. There will be several to choose from.

Of all the things that can kill us, Mayans and magnets and axes (oh my!) aren't among them. Rest easier.

When you're in your twenties, enlightenment Nov 2012 #1
I'm going to assume you're a white heterosexual man. nt sufrommich Nov 2012 #2
You don't have to assume it nichomachus Nov 2012 #3
I think he is trying to say it would be even worse than 1962, not saying that 1962 wasnt bad stevenleser Nov 2012 #27
1962, eh? The civil rights movement was just getting underway and MineralMan Nov 2012 #4
I believe I mentioned that nichomachus Nov 2012 #5
It was very far from perfect. MineralMan Nov 2012 #6
If you want to be pedantic, you're right Not Sure Nov 2012 #9
Having lived through that time means that I'm not being pedantic. MineralMan Nov 2012 #10
+ infinity SemperEadem Nov 2012 #23
++++++++ Whisp Nov 2012 #25
I should have said straight white male. MineralMan Nov 2012 #26
all I heaven05 Nov 2012 #28
Yes. The Republicans would take us to a dark, dark place. MineralMan Nov 2012 #29
Everyone looks back and femrap Nov 2012 #11
+10000 heaven05 Nov 2012 #20
I grew up in femrap Nov 2012 #30
well heaven05 Nov 2012 #34
While most of your post is a nice read, I just can't let those last 2 paragraphs go unanswered. DRoseDARs Nov 2012 #31
no heaven05 Nov 2012 #35
I don't believe I femrap Nov 2012 #36
Romney would take us places none of us have ever been reserved for Central Europe in the 1930-1945 gordianot Nov 2012 #7
Yet... femrap Nov 2012 #14
I thought we were headed femrap Nov 2012 #8
The post you are referring to was not intended to be a historical comparison between now and plethoro Nov 2012 #12
In 1962, my mom was fired for getting pregnant gollygee Nov 2012 #13
Probably from a low paying job she got by looking under sufrommich Nov 2012 #16
True, but 50 years ago treestar Nov 2012 #15
He won't take us anywhere Johonny Nov 2012 #17
These are my thoughts also. If Romney wins the days plethoro Nov 2012 #21
got heaven05 Nov 2012 #22
Everyone I know has started preparations, from cursory to exhaustive. I am in the middle....Good plethoro Nov 2012 #24
When I listen to his policies, I picture the pre-Medieval era ecstatic Nov 2012 #18
Actually, republicans aren't that crazy about the Magna Carta, MsPithy Nov 2012 #19
90 years? Hell they want to take us back to feudalism!!! Initech Nov 2012 #32
Take it back about *150* years and you'd have that about right - The Robber Baron/Gilded Age We People Nov 2012 #33
Good point. I miss the 60s. I really, really miss the 70s. yardwork Nov 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Romney presidency will ...»Reply #31