Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
Thu Nov 24, 2022, 11:41 AM Nov 2022

Scientists Increasingly Calling to Dim the Sun [View all]

Yah, what possibly could go wrong with that?


Just last month, the White House announced a five-year research plan to study geoengineering, a sign that the idea has moved out of the realm of science fiction amidst a period of rapidly rising temperatures and failed climate targets.


--- more and more researchers turning to investigate geoengineering as a potential last resort.

Just like particles released by a massive volcano — previous eruptions have been shown to lead to dropping temperatures — injecting aerosolized sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere could have similar results.

While there's consensus among experts that there's a good chance these particles could actually shade and cool the surface below, we're only starting to understand the possible side effects, particularly on a global scale.


https://futurism.com/scientists-calling-dim-sun-geoengineering

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many dystopian movies have this plot? maxsolomon Nov 2022 #1
It was the plot of Who Shot Mr. Burns, for one! Initech Nov 2022 #12
Then next ice age will arrive sooner? at140 Nov 2022 #2
Uh, no. Mammals thrive during Ice Ages NickB79 Nov 2022 #19
You are uninformed at140 Nov 2022 #24
10,000 years ago, there were only 1-15 million people. Dysfunctional Nov 2022 #25
I'm more of a tapas guy, but I could go for some dim sun unblock Nov 2022 #3
Photographers lose, either way. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #4
I call this enemy The Sun Beetwasher. Nov 2022 #5
"What town did we just crush?" "Shelbyville!" "Yay!!!!" Initech Nov 2022 #22
It's terrifyingly stupid gulliver Nov 2022 #6
Thank you for posting this. CoopersDad Nov 2022 #7
I'm Unconvinced ProfessorGAC Nov 2022 #13
Is not the elephant in the room human overpopulation? jeffreyi Nov 2022 #8
What's the solution to over population? Darwins_Retriever Nov 2022 #10
It isn't legislation that causes over population, but poverty. thucythucy Nov 2022 #11
Exactly, and there is a productive effect for the people freed up to pursue careers. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #16
By the time such measures could be implemented, it'd be too late Kaleva Nov 2022 #27
We may be in enough trouble if there's a seriously major volcanic eruption, Emrys Nov 2022 #9
Send all those "scientists" to work in Antarctica for 12 years. See how much they like ice and cold Shanti Shanti Shanti Nov 2022 #14
More or less the subject of Neal Stephenson's novel "Termination Shock" Liberal In Texas Nov 2022 #15
There are also "scientists" who say climate change isn't real. Not much difference between them. NNadir Nov 2022 #17
Sure, everybody loves acid rain. Instead, put some shade in geosynchronous orbit. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2022 #18
Faint-Sun Paradox popsicle dreaming? RealityChik Nov 2022 #20
Much more CO2 and methane at that time explains the Faint-Sun paradox NickB79 Nov 2022 #23
Faint-Sun Paradox popsicle dreaming? RealityChik Nov 2022 #21
One the onehand this is something NOT to be left to elitist scientists Model35mech Nov 2022 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientists Increasingly C...