Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,065 posts)
17. Exxcept that none of that is true
Mon Jun 3, 2024, 02:48 PM
Jun 2024

You are not "convicted" of a "crime" when you lose a civil judgment. Criminal convictions have to be unanimous and with a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. Civil trials are much easier to press.

Nor was he convicted of the illegal campaign contributions that are assumed in the jury's guilty verdict here. The prosecutor lacked the jurisdiction to bring that charge and the judge lacked the jurisdiction to hear such a case... The people who DID have that jurisdiction chose not to prosecute at all... so he can't be said to have been convicted of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No way a first time offen...»Reply #17