I was #1. And took the alert seriously as you'll read..
"this person is following me around and making disturbing remarks that offer nothing of value to the original post. They need to be warned not to stalk or harass."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Apr 12, 2014, 09:34 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: ignore feature. that seems more pragmatic to me. if you're gonna alert on Sid, do it because he's Canadian..and in being so, partially responsible for hockey
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Meh. Put them on ignore if they bother you.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The OP is sarcasm. Sid's response if sarcasm. Where is the problem, exactly?
Edit history
= new reply since forum marked as read
