Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: because apparently some people think this is up for debate [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)75. I've noticed most of those posters come out late at night. Must feel lonely or bored...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
actually. you are wrong. no does mean no. even if playing a game, there is a safe word... for no
seabeyond
May 2014
#29
we are not starting with me. but. that is a fact. no does indeed mean no. even playing a game.
seabeyond
May 2014
#54
since it was an "essentially" i was not totally clear. and i was reiterating.
seabeyond
May 2014
#62
You're the one playing semantics. No means no. If certain people want to substitute a different word
redqueen
May 2014
#61
I've noticed most of those posters come out late at night. Must feel lonely or bored...
freshwest
May 2014
#75
Well, that was my first thought, too, but I didn't want to be accused of being a man-hating '___.'
freshwest
May 2014
#77
Ah, so this is a thinly veiled callout thread. Why not include a link too while you're at it? nt
Electric Monk
May 2014
#12
If your purpose is "to see who is actually more inline with community standards" then I'm with you
Jim Lane
May 2014
#102
The "host" coupled with the quote gave me a good idea who you meant...and...
Spider Jerusalem
May 2014
#18
there is a potentially interesting discussion of the interesection of art (particularly cinema) and
el_bryanto
May 2014
#20
Nods - I guess I'm thinking along those lines because of Andrew O'Herir's article
el_bryanto
May 2014
#25
"Evenings of paying to be rejected can feel like a male version of date rape." ??????
gollygee
May 2014
#23
Yes. A few people here used to go on and on about how the president asked him to
redqueen
May 2014
#30
Surely it's true! If you can't trust a rape and pedophilia apologist then who can you trust?
redqueen
May 2014
#38
I think his comments about "family sex" (his euphemism for incest) are even worse. nt
redqueen
May 2014
#34
I heard of him when someone posted an OP about his book - The Myth of Male Power.
redqueen
May 2014
#41
I was reading that too and this person is sick and demented, surely hope NOBODY on this forum
randys1
May 2014
#47
"We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape and date fraud,we called it excitin"?
uppityperson
May 2014
#55
ugh. It reminds me of an ex who warned me about what to expect, re-entering the dating scene
uppityperson
May 2014
#68
was that from July 2012 post as search gave me a post by him then with this in it, or more recent?
uppityperson
May 2014
#71
thanks. I am willing to give people a chance to update opinions and appreciate seeing them.
uppityperson
May 2014
#73
"No means no" is easy. What "yes" means is sometimes easy, but sometimes hard. N.T.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#13
no means no. and if a yes cause she is cowardly and cannot walk beyond the societal structures that
seabeyond
May 2014
#14
Oh, lookee! He's got a book! And a website! And he lives abroad! What cool beans! PM?
freshwest
May 2014
#74
exactly, there is no interpretation to be done when a no has been spoken nt
geek tragedy
May 2014
#48
several people have endorsed the work of an author who has made that claim.
geek tragedy
May 2014
#91
In another thread, I just saw someone actually post that if anything bad happens
Jamastiene
May 2014
#92
we'lll see if the other misogynist pigs are over at discussionist or whether they're
geek tragedy
May 2014
#96