Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: KRUGMAN: How big a deal is the surprise primary defeat of Representative Eric Cantor? VERY. [View all]kg4jxt
(30 posts)41. VERY? Maybe not so much
I read that only 65,000 voted in the primary. It seemed to me at the time that the early analysis was that Cantor may have simply gone down to voter apathy. There are a lot of anecdotal explanations floating around and maybe some of them are insightful and even illuminating, but 65,000 voters do not make a movement. I would not read TOO much into this joyous event.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
KRUGMAN: How big a deal is the surprise primary defeat of Representative Eric Cantor? VERY. [View all]
kpete
Jun 2014
OP
The rejection of Cantor was a rejection of the "status quo". It was a rejection of the
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#3
There are a number of possible things that affected the vote including those that openly stated
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#27
I hope we both agree that Cantor was big time oligarch-run status quo. Cantor and his ilk
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#30
It's got to be a bit more about Cantor's arrogance with his own consituents.
SleeplessinSoCal
Jun 2014
#7
Our current crop of GOP/Tea Party shows what happens when crazy zealots get money
SoCalDem
Jun 2014
#15
Excellent assessment, Fred! Plus, this picture makes me want to turn around & check MY back!
NBachers
Jun 2014
#28
"Republicans mobilize voters with social issues, but invariably turn postelection to serving the 1%.
pampango
Jun 2014
#14
I hope he's right that it's bad news for the GOP...I really believe he's correct
joeybee12
Jun 2014
#20
All I know is that if I were the swordsman, I would have wondered why Jones was just standing there.
rocktivity
Jun 2014
#40
I've met a few Right Wingers that claim being pro gay marriage is one of THEIR issues....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2014
#23