Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama is the Fracking-Supporter-In-Chief [View all]Agony
(2,605 posts)32. No problem, get your town to ban it. The Appeals Court agrees that you can.
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/06/new_york_court_of_appeals_fracking_ban_middlefield_dryden.html
We don't need to depend on corrupt politicians to control our own destiny all of the time.
This is one of those times.
We don't need to depend on corrupt politicians to control our own destiny all of the time.
This is one of those times.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fracking does no more harm than what coal mining does. I grew up in southern WV, its atrocious.
phleshdef
Jul 2014
#10
I never said I did. but I rely on science, scientists and environmental organizations
cali
Jul 2014
#21
That is among the reasons I wrote what I did, that we need to require disclosure.
NYC_SKP
Jul 2014
#8
FracFocus....seems to say that the "Trade Secrets" applies to some of the disclosures
KoKo
Jul 2014
#38
My state has a pending bill NOT to require disclosure of chemicals in the Fracking process which
KoKo
Jul 2014
#30
That Nat Gas and Shale Oil is going to be exported. Tearing up country and poisoning our
KoKo
Jul 2014
#23