Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
26. There is a reason for D politicians Who have adopted a hybrid theory of governance
Sat Aug 22, 2015, 06:14 PM
Aug 2015

to try to separate the two, for the followers of this hybrid Democratic path (first proposed by the DLC/Third Way branch of the party), It is important to support (or at least appear to support) certain social issues in order to retain some key demographic votes with long ties to the party while embracing a neoliberal approach to fiscal policies, free trade, and privatization.

Their theory simply was/is to adopt certain policies they felt would gain votes from the Reagan supporting Demographic (and also attract large donations from special interests that prosper from neoliberal policies) while keeping the minority, feminist and LGBT vote.

To see supporters of such politicians twist themselves in knots to separate the two falls neatly within the game plan. It is hard to say if vocal supporters of candidates that follow the hybrid path do so deliberately or unwittingly. I imagine that would depend on the individual.

It is the only way they can win, they need the minority vote but they are fiscally committed to right wing policies that lead directly to income inequality and economic injustice. They have in fact already lead us with help from the extreme right wing Republicans directly to a new gilded age we "enjoy" that is reaching Dickensian proportions.

The Left is just a hated thorn in their side at this point and economic populism is the threat they fear the most.
They must divide us along social and economic lines in order to conquer us.

Hence the barrage of attempts (some of them rather nasty) to separate issues that are really two parts of a whole needed for both the social and economic equality that is required if we are to have a healthy happy and just society.

I wrote an OP once that explained these hybrids for those less aware of the party's history and the rise of this faction.

New Democrats, The DLC and the Third Way

Here is a relevant snip:

....After the landslide electoral losses to Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, a group of prominent Democrats began to believe their party was in need of a radical shift in economic policy and ideas of governance. The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was founded in 1985 by Al From and a group of like-minded politicians and strategists. They advocated a political "Third Way" as a method to achieve the electoral successes of Reaganism by adopting similar economic policies (Reagan Democrats and Moderate Republicans would provide burgeoning new constituencies after adding these new economic policies and politicians to our tent they contended) While hoping to retain, woman, minorities and other social issues allies with long ties to the party. Such would be their new Democratic coalition forged between fiscal right and social left under the "New" Democratic banner. The DLC disbanded in 2011 during an apparent re-branding of the New Democrat movement when money ties to the Koch bros. and Koch representatives placed on the DLC's board embarrassingly became common knowledge among the Democratic left...


Good to see you again, it has been a while my friend, excellent OP by the way.
This is a good read...K & R... Wounded Bear Aug 2015 #1
Good understanding of this explosive issue that seems to have been influenced ... AuntPatsy Aug 2015 #2
Good read Catherina... AOR Aug 2015 #3
Thanks Catherina malaise Aug 2015 #4
It's all true, but that doesn't make it wrong to focus on racism starroute Aug 2015 #5
+1 navarth Aug 2015 #7
Of course not, we agree on that Catherina Aug 2015 #11
Agree with both of you........ socialist_n_TN Aug 2015 #36
Hi my friend! Catherina Aug 2015 #39
Yep. I really do believe that was his first goal with his candidacy........ socialist_n_TN Aug 2015 #42
If so, I hope the movement is sound enough in basic theory Catherina Aug 2015 #61
Recommended. mmonk Aug 2015 #6
Another Jacobin fan RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #18
. mmonk Aug 2015 #35
Bookmarked for later. hifiguy Aug 2015 #8
K&R...thank you! n/t OneGrassRoot Aug 2015 #9
I could be wrong, but didn't some Black American DUers Baitball Blogger Aug 2015 #10
Not all Black DUers, just a few who claim to speak for everyone Catherina Aug 2015 #14
Thank you for the response. Baitball Blogger Aug 2015 #20
+1000 "It's all about political access and economic rewards" n/t Catherina Aug 2015 #22
There is a reason for D politicians Who have adopted a hybrid theory of governance Dragonfli Aug 2015 #26
As if I didn't love you enough already! Thanks 4 an astute, awesome post Catherina Aug 2015 #28
Token support for minorities, is what it boils down to. Baitball Blogger Aug 2015 #30
This deserves to be its own OP. stranger81 Aug 2015 #67
You're wrong. Almost all black DUers disagree with this type of analysis. kwassa Aug 2015 #32
How are you going to change the Police Department's antagonistic process, Baitball Blogger Aug 2015 #60
Public perceptions are being changed about the police. That is what BLM .... kwassa Aug 2015 #77
how can you possibly know what most black americans think? noiretextatique Aug 2015 #72
I know a lot of black people. Don't you? kwassa Aug 2015 #74
how about common sense? noiretextatique Aug 2015 #78
There is no way Sanders will not be painted as a socialist. kwassa Aug 2015 #81
yeah the ones who claim all AA's hate other AA critics of Obama. m-lekktor Aug 2015 #51
K & R beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #12
Thanks. I'm glad to be back too Catherina Aug 2015 #23
Very good analysis; makes sense of a lot of things. n/t Beartracks Aug 2015 #13
This webpage is not available LWolf Aug 2015 #15
Are you using Chrome? Catherina Aug 2015 #16
I WAS using chrome; LWolf Aug 2015 #19
I'm glad FF worked Catherina Aug 2015 #25
Oh, no. LWolf Aug 2015 #31
I'll send you an extra duster Catherina Aug 2015 #62
Okay. LWolf Aug 2015 #64
Excellent read. Recommended. RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #17
Great read. I have felt this needed saying DirkGently Aug 2015 #21
cogent, drama-free analysis of the realities of change. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #24
Bookmarking for later, thank you :) n/t slipslidingaway Aug 2015 #27
Interesting read. Gormy Cuss Aug 2015 #29
Class and race operate both separately and together to impoverish people. Catherina Aug 2015 #38
I don't see anyone here separating the two. Well, let me correct that. I DO see people here sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #45
I see people here who almost reflexively try to shift a racial injustice topic into an economic one Gormy Cuss Aug 2015 #46
What's really tiresome is to see such an enormous issue, ignored mostly by the same people sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #48
This analysis is mistaken, of course. It is, of course, from a socialist magazine .... kwassa Aug 2015 #33
+10^10^100. The piece is extremely poorly written and makes points that don't follow at all. stevenleser Aug 2015 #40
So are you ssaying that you do not support Economic Equality/Justice for minorities? That appears sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #47
"So are you ssaying that you do not support Economic Equality/Justice for minorities?" NuclearDem Aug 2015 #49
What does any of that have to do with fighting for economic equality? And just WHO has ever said sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #50
You are diverting the topic. This thread is about BLM, not income equality per se. kwassa Aug 2015 #53
The topic is 'why Liberals Separate Racism from Class'. That is what the title of the OP sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #55
No, the issue of income equality is not irrelevant. kwassa Aug 2015 #73
It's not just the AA posters on DU. Huge majorities of black people everywhere have been saying this Number23 Aug 2015 #87
I have to wonder if O.J. Simpson had been poor, not having celebrity and economic power would the Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #52
I think we know the answer to that Uncle Joe! sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #54
It don't get it either, sabrina? Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #56
You don't get it because those arguments don't exist. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #57
Nobody is saying it will, but economic justice will go a long way toward leveling the playing field. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #58
Right-wing economics... MountCleaners Aug 2015 #84
Shameless bullshit allegation - and you know it is. Twisting the truth that they are sometimes bettyellen Aug 2015 #68
Sorry, but that is how it is coming across. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #69
No one said it - so stop saying they did. It's nonsense. bettyellen Aug 2015 #71
Who is "they"? It is just a charge being thrown about. Capitalism requires division, an hierachy mmonk Aug 2015 #41
Great post. Lisa D Aug 2015 #43
Well said kwassa. PragmaticLiberal Aug 2015 #44
how do you propose to end racism in all areas of American life? noiretextatique Aug 2015 #75
Educate the public about the history of racism and it's effects. kwassa Aug 2015 #80
Yet you don't even mention the profit motivation that caused .... socialist_n_TN Aug 2015 #82
Race was around long before capitalism. kwassa Aug 2015 #83
You're right but that person will never be able to accept that. If you have bought into stevenleser Aug 2015 #90
K & R historylovr Aug 2015 #34
Good article. daleo Aug 2015 #37
I'm so glad someone spelled this out daredtowork Aug 2015 #59
You're welcome n/t Catherina Aug 2015 #63
Great article! hifiguy Aug 2015 #65
Who treats race as "permanent and unchanging"- link please! bettyellen Aug 2015 #66
race is not permanent and unchanging noiretextatique Aug 2015 #76
Class issues threaten both Parties' financial backers. Social ones do not. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #70
i am wondering where all those outraged black Duers are? noiretextatique Aug 2015 #79
You know where to find them. kwassa Aug 2015 #85
and here is the rest of Bernie's problem, from today's NYT. kwassa Aug 2015 #86
Don't get me started Catherina Aug 2015 #88
Not SOCIALISM...not from MLK!? noiretextatique Aug 2015 #92
Your inability to discuss the issues is telling. kwassa Aug 2015 #93
Some would rather control what others think Waiting For Everyman Aug 2015 #89
Because liberals know folks like Julian Bond greymattermom Aug 2015 #91
ttt Blue_Tires Aug 2015 #94
Great article, very thoughtful, thanks. nt Zorra Aug 2015 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Liberals Separate Rac...»Reply #26