Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The fact that Ohio has Trump ahead is a big red flag for politicians to stay away from shitty trade [View all]
deals. So we have Hillary with a shot at deep red Georgia and Texas but behind in Ohio is pretty eye opening. Trump is such a flawed candidate that he is putting deep red southern states in play this round but those probably won't be in play next time and Ohio will. We can't afford to lose Ohio in the future in a closer election so Democrats better take notice. Ohio is freaking me out.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
64 replies, 8100 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The fact that Ohio has Trump ahead is a big red flag for politicians to stay away from shitty trade [View all]
Quixote1818
Oct 2016
OP
I agree we very likely have this election won, it's the future I am worried about.
Quixote1818
Oct 2016
#3
I'll go with Benchmark. Their polling method is the most precise & detailed I see.
misterhighwasted
Oct 2016
#6
Romney / McCain supported those deals too. Trump is leading there because he is hammering NAFTA.
Quixote1818
Oct 2016
#7
Nafta is at worse Neutral, so we should run policy on perception of harm, not real harm?
Foggyhill
Oct 2016
#37
I supported it at the time of Bush too. I live in Texas so my opinion is more from being more concer
Jim Beard
Oct 2016
#55
oh really? trump selling out american jobs and buying china steel is ok with Ohio residents? nt
msongs
Oct 2016
#12
Built a damn hotel in Vegas with that crap. Will probably cave in on peoples' heads with age.
lonestarnot
Oct 2016
#13
Nobody is defending Trump here. What we're saying is that the line he takes on trade
Ken Burch
Oct 2016
#21
Many of the people I've seen interviewed sound totally batsh*t crazy. Like that guy.
Vinca
Oct 2016
#49
historically, Ohio has tended towards close elections, IAW 270towin 538 has clinton 61.38% to win
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2016
#35
Nafta is at worse Neutral, so we should run policy on perception of harm, not real harm?
Foggyhill
Oct 2016
#38
Create a boogeyman out of a trade deal then keep scaring people with it. At the same time
pampango
Oct 2016
#44
It's bait and switch, now that trickle down has blown up their people, they need a new scapegoat
Foggyhill
Oct 2016
#47
Fucking amazing....6 months ago most on DU were totally against TPP. Now everyone wants it?
davidn3600
Oct 2016
#61