Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
28. They don't like the trade deals...
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 10:38 AM
Oct 2016

But will vote for a guy who has his goods manufactured in China? Uses Chinese steel on his buildings?

Ugh

Don't freak out Jason1961 Oct 2016 #1
I agree we very likely have this election won, it's the future I am worried about. Quixote1818 Oct 2016 #3
Not if we win Georgia and Texas! EL34x4 Oct 2016 #14
hmmm..Benchmark has Hillary up by 4.7 in Ohio misterhighwasted Oct 2016 #2
All polls combined have Trump ahead there Quixote1818 Oct 2016 #4
I'll go with Benchmark. Their polling method is the most precise & detailed I see. misterhighwasted Oct 2016 #6
No, Ohio doesn't "decide" the election... Wounded Bear Oct 2016 #19
Ohio has been a republican state for many years, since the days of Jim Beard Oct 2016 #54
You mean that Ohio whatthehey Oct 2016 #5
Romney / McCain supported those deals too. Trump is leading there because he is hammering NAFTA. Quixote1818 Oct 2016 #7
It's easy to hammer NAFTA. Difficult to create an alternative. yardwork Oct 2016 #11
And Romney/McCain weren't sex abusing hapless political neophytes either whatthehey Oct 2016 #15
Nafta is at worse Neutral, so we should run policy on perception of harm, not real harm? Foggyhill Oct 2016 #37
Bush 1 supported NAFTA, in fact his admin started it Motley13 Oct 2016 #53
I supported it at the time of Bush too. I live in Texas so my opinion is more from being more concer Jim Beard Oct 2016 #55
Fortunately, this election doesn't depend on how Ohio votes. stopbush Oct 2016 #8
Reagan destroyed Ohio. liberalmuse Oct 2016 #9
The fact that Hillary is winning nationally might imply something else. yardwork Oct 2016 #10
Thank you. And... NurseJackie Oct 2016 #16
Some of our little friends are sneaking back. yardwork Oct 2016 #17
oh really? trump selling out american jobs and buying china steel is ok with Ohio residents? nt msongs Oct 2016 #12
Built a damn hotel in Vegas with that crap. Will probably cave in on peoples' heads with age. lonestarnot Oct 2016 #13
Nobody is defending Trump here. What we're saying is that the line he takes on trade Ken Burch Oct 2016 #21
No. Glassunion Oct 2016 #48
To make such an odd point requires a little revelant information postatomic Oct 2016 #18
If our platform had said "NO TPP", We'd be doing better now than in '64. Ken Burch Oct 2016 #20
You're overestimating voters' intelligence ... NurseJackie Oct 2016 #22
Amen! KitSileya Oct 2016 #24
Well said Egnever Oct 2016 #42
Yup ismnotwasm Oct 2016 #45
Actually, it's a big red flag that Ohio voters aren't paying attention. Vinca Oct 2016 #23
Brainwashed Bear Creek Oct 2016 #25
Actually, it's a big red flag that Ohio voters aren't paying attention. LenaBaby61 Oct 2016 #46
Many of the people I've seen interviewed sound totally batsh*t crazy. Like that guy. Vinca Oct 2016 #49
That sounds like alot of the people in my part of NW Ohio. bulloney Oct 2016 #60
Ohio is always close EricMaundry Oct 2016 #26
I don't like the realignment on free trade either Peaches999 Oct 2016 #27
Before you predict future Democratic losses, Cary Oct 2016 #32
Elections ebb and flow Peaches999 Oct 2016 #36
This is different Cary Oct 2016 #39
I'm not convinced Hillary will have large coattails Peaches999 Oct 2016 #40
The demographics have changed Cary Oct 2016 #41
They don't like the trade deals... apcalc Oct 2016 #28
Ugh is right Cary Oct 2016 #30
Demographics Cary Oct 2016 #29
Fleshing this out a bit...rural Ohio is very conservative Maeve Oct 2016 #56
The only constant is change Cary Oct 2016 #57
The polls I have seen show OH is split 50-50. LisaL Oct 2016 #31
this Ohioan believes Hillary will win Ohio rbrnmw Oct 2016 #33
I agree its not the time to give up on winning OH. LisaL Oct 2016 #34
historically, Ohio has tended towards close elections, IAW 270towin 538 has clinton 61.38% to win Agnosticsherbet Oct 2016 #35
Nafta is at worse Neutral, so we should run policy on perception of harm, not real harm? Foggyhill Oct 2016 #38
Agreed Egnever Oct 2016 #43
Create a boogeyman out of a trade deal then keep scaring people with it. At the same time pampango Oct 2016 #44
It's bait and switch, now that trickle down has blown up their people, they need a new scapegoat Foggyhill Oct 2016 #47
The takeaway should be that we'll need to fight hard to the end Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2016 #50
Agree pedal to the metal up to and including Nov 8! apcalc Oct 2016 #52
The Republicans might run a pro-free trader next time. David__77 Oct 2016 #51
How do they address this alt right thing? Cary Oct 2016 #58
The Republicans will split after the election Algernon Moncrieff Oct 2016 #62
The Democrats are three steps behind them? Cary Oct 2016 #64
they support Kasich and Obama is more pro free trade than Clinton JI7 Oct 2016 #59
Fucking amazing....6 months ago most on DU were totally against TPP. Now everyone wants it? davidn3600 Oct 2016 #61
Why progressives should rescue the TPP trade deal Grey Lemercier Oct 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The fact that Ohio has Tr...»Reply #28