Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Drum roll please....Top story on Morning Joe is ..... [View all]emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)51. Classic case of confirmation bias going on with you.
What Is a Confirmation Bias? Examples and Observations
https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-confirmation-bias-2795024
You dislike Bill Clinton so you believe everybody dislikes him, contrary to evidence otherwise.
You're predisposed to believe anything negative about Bill and Hillary Clintons whether it is factual or not. You believe any negative spin by these obviously bad actors is 'fact.'
-----
What Is a Confirmation Bias?
A confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias that involves favoring information that confirms previously existing beliefs or biases. For example, imagine that a person holds a belief that left-handed people are more creative than right-handed people. Whenever this person encounters a person that is both left-handed and creative, they place greater importance on this "evidence" supporting their already existing belief. This individual might even seek "proof" that further backs up this belief while discounting examples that do not support this idea.
Confirmation biases impact how people gather information, but they also influence how people interpret and recall information. For example, people who support or oppose a particular issue will not only seek information that supports their beliefs, they will also interpret news stories in a way that upholds their existing ideas and remember things in a way that also reinforces these attitudes.
Examples of Confirmation Biases in Action
Consider the debate over gun control. Sally is in support of gun control. She seeks out news stories and opinion pieces that reaffirm the need for limitations on gun ownership. When she hears stories about shootings in the media, she interprets them in a way that supports her existing beliefs.
Henry, on the other hand, is adamantly opposed to gun control. He seeks out news sources that are aligned with his position, and when he comes across news stories about shootings, he interprets them in a way that supports his current point of view.
The Impact of Confirmation Biases
A number of experiments conducted during the 1960s demonstrated that people have a tendency to seek information that confirms their existing beliefs. Unfortunately, this type of bias can prevent us from looking at situations objectively, can influence the decisions we make, and can lead to poor or faulty choices.
During an election season, for example, people tend to seek positive information that paints their favored candidates in a good light while looking for information that casts the opposing candidate in a negative light. By not seeking out objective facts, interpreting information in a way that only supports their existing beliefs, and only remembering details that uphold these beliefs, people often miss important information that might have otherwise influenced their decision on which candidate to support.
https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-confirmation-bias-2795024
You dislike Bill Clinton so you believe everybody dislikes him, contrary to evidence otherwise.
You're predisposed to believe anything negative about Bill and Hillary Clintons whether it is factual or not. You believe any negative spin by these obviously bad actors is 'fact.'
-----
What Is a Confirmation Bias?
A confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias that involves favoring information that confirms previously existing beliefs or biases. For example, imagine that a person holds a belief that left-handed people are more creative than right-handed people. Whenever this person encounters a person that is both left-handed and creative, they place greater importance on this "evidence" supporting their already existing belief. This individual might even seek "proof" that further backs up this belief while discounting examples that do not support this idea.
Confirmation biases impact how people gather information, but they also influence how people interpret and recall information. For example, people who support or oppose a particular issue will not only seek information that supports their beliefs, they will also interpret news stories in a way that upholds their existing ideas and remember things in a way that also reinforces these attitudes.
Examples of Confirmation Biases in Action
Consider the debate over gun control. Sally is in support of gun control. She seeks out news stories and opinion pieces that reaffirm the need for limitations on gun ownership. When she hears stories about shootings in the media, she interprets them in a way that supports her existing beliefs.
Henry, on the other hand, is adamantly opposed to gun control. He seeks out news sources that are aligned with his position, and when he comes across news stories about shootings, he interprets them in a way that supports his current point of view.
The Impact of Confirmation Biases
A number of experiments conducted during the 1960s demonstrated that people have a tendency to seek information that confirms their existing beliefs. Unfortunately, this type of bias can prevent us from looking at situations objectively, can influence the decisions we make, and can lead to poor or faulty choices.
During an election season, for example, people tend to seek positive information that paints their favored candidates in a good light while looking for information that casts the opposing candidate in a negative light. By not seeking out objective facts, interpreting information in a way that only supports their existing beliefs, and only remembering details that uphold these beliefs, people often miss important information that might have otherwise influenced their decision on which candidate to support.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Trump wasn't so darned grotesque, this kind of baggage would have been a huge
GreenPartyVoter
Oct 2016
#4
Don't get me wrong, I agree with you. I just think that Trump is distracting from it somewhat.
GreenPartyVoter
Oct 2016
#6
Oh so Bill inc. asking for $66,000'000 over nine years is caused by "Ex Sanders folks"
awake
Oct 2016
#15
I have had the same feeling about Bill since watching how he undercut Hillary in 2008
awake
Oct 2016
#16
You can get as mad at me as you want but I still believe Hillary still has a problem named Bill
awake
Oct 2016
#20
They would talk stolen if some of their emails were released. Since tRump is mad at them,
anamandujano
Oct 2016
#52
All the E-mails there talking about were already public. Same ol Nothing.........
Old Vet
Oct 2016
#24
Probably because you won't get invited back on, and that would be costly for most of them.
OnDoutside
Oct 2016
#37
Such a vicious circle, electing the rich who write laws to benefit themselves.
GreenPartyVoter
Oct 2016
#29
That show is really, reallly bad & more disgusting than even fox because they try to claim a higher
EV_Ares
Oct 2016
#31
I believe, because really hard to figure those hypocripts out that all they are is self-promoters,
EV_Ares
Oct 2016
#36
It's a bit like trying to kick the Diet Coke habit...you know it's bad for you, but you keep going
OnDoutside
Oct 2016
#38
Some of you are addicted to anxiety endorphins. These talking heads aren't journalists...
LuvLoogie
Oct 2016
#46