Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

emulatorloo

(44,120 posts)
51. Classic case of confirmation bias going on with you.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 11:27 AM
Oct 2016
What Is a Confirmation Bias? Examples and Observations
https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-confirmation-bias-2795024

You dislike Bill Clinton so you believe everybody dislikes him, contrary to evidence otherwise.

You're predisposed to believe anything negative about Bill and Hillary Clintons whether it is factual or not. You believe any negative spin by these obviously bad actors is 'fact.'

-----

What Is a Confirmation Bias?
A confirmation bias is a type of cognitive bias that involves favoring information that confirms previously existing beliefs or biases. For example, imagine that a person holds a belief that left-handed people are more creative than right-handed people. Whenever this person encounters a person that is both left-handed and creative, they place greater importance on this "evidence" supporting their already existing belief. This individual might even seek "proof" that further backs up this belief while discounting examples that do not support this idea.

Confirmation biases impact how people gather information, but they also influence how people interpret and recall information. For example, people who support or oppose a particular issue will not only seek information that supports their beliefs, they will also interpret news stories in a way that upholds their existing ideas and remember things in a way that also reinforces these attitudes.

Examples of Confirmation Biases in Action
Consider the debate over gun control. Sally is in support of gun control. She seeks out news stories and opinion pieces that reaffirm the need for limitations on gun ownership. When she hears stories about shootings in the media, she interprets them in a way that supports her existing beliefs.


Henry, on the other hand, is adamantly opposed to gun control. He seeks out news sources that are aligned with his position, and when he comes across news stories about shootings, he interprets them in a way that supports his current point of view.

The Impact of Confirmation Biases
A number of experiments conducted during the 1960s demonstrated that people have a tendency to seek information that confirms their existing beliefs. Unfortunately, this type of bias can prevent us from looking at situations objectively, can influence the decisions we make, and can lead to poor or faulty choices.

During an election season, for example, people tend to seek positive information that paints their favored candidates in a good light while looking for information that casts the opposing candidate in a negative light. By not seeking out objective facts, interpreting information in a way that only supports their existing beliefs, and only remembering details that uphold these beliefs, people often miss important information that might have otherwise influenced their decision on which candidate to support.
Ridiculous. apcalc Oct 2016 #1
no one is listening.... Sancho Oct 2016 #2
Surprise Surprise Bill does some thing which is not helpful to Hillary awake Oct 2016 #3
If Trump wasn't so darned grotesque, this kind of baggage would have been a huge GreenPartyVoter Oct 2016 #4
This IS a problem ! awake Oct 2016 #5
Don't get me wrong, I agree with you. I just think that Trump is distracting from it somewhat. GreenPartyVoter Oct 2016 #6
Except this info was already mostly public Foggyhill Oct 2016 #9
Oh so Bill inc. asking for $66,000'000 over nine years is caused by "Ex Sanders folks" awake Oct 2016 #15
I'm starting to think that maybe HarmonyRockets Oct 2016 #11
Did you actually read about this Foggyhill Oct 2016 #13
I have had the same feeling about Bill since watching how he undercut Hillary in 2008 awake Oct 2016 #16
Reading your rant about Bill above Foggyhill Oct 2016 #19
You can get as mad at me as you want but I still believe Hillary still has a problem named Bill awake Oct 2016 #20
Yet hes still got less unfavourable than her Foggyhill Oct 2016 #21
Bill is not running Hillary is awake Oct 2016 #59
So why is this an "issue" then ? Foggyhill Oct 2016 #62
As James Carville said... awake Oct 2016 #63
Classic case of confirmation bias going on with you. emulatorloo Oct 2016 #51
I do not need any confirmation about Bill awake Oct 2016 #57
Fair enough emulatorloo Oct 2016 #58
it's not really baggage at all. JI7 Oct 2016 #28
So there's no caveats to this story either!?!? uponit7771 Oct 2016 #47
If it wasn’t the emails, it would be something else. Arkansas Granny Oct 2016 #7
and that's why Morning Joe Coolest Ranger Oct 2016 #8
These leaks keep getting worse! GWC58 Oct 2016 #10
Most of this was already public Foggyhill Oct 2016 #12
They would talk stolen if some of their emails were released. Since tRump is mad at them, anamandujano Oct 2016 #52
All the E-mails there talking about were already public. Same ol Nothing......... Old Vet Oct 2016 #24
You woke me up for that? n/t MrModerate Oct 2016 #14
... anamandujano Oct 2016 #53
JoeScum is desperate malaise Oct 2016 #17
So did I. You can see the rest of them being afraid to cross him. OnDoutside Oct 2016 #22
Hes so weak at rethotic and logic Foggyhill Oct 2016 #25
Probably because you won't get invited back on, and that would be costly for most of them. OnDoutside Oct 2016 #37
It was truly horrible this morning Ghost of Tom Joad Oct 2016 #18
Only the rich can run for president. All rich people do this stuff. lindysalsagal Oct 2016 #26
Such a vicious circle, electing the rich who write laws to benefit themselves. GreenPartyVoter Oct 2016 #29
Almost as bad as the european monarchies of the 17th century. lindysalsagal Oct 2016 #50
Obama was not rich. JI7 Oct 2016 #56
WaPo has an article too Ruth Bonner Oct 2016 #27
So, nothing as usual Foggyhill Oct 2016 #30
++++++++++++SCANDAL CAVEAT HERE+++++++++++++++++++++++ uponit7771 Oct 2016 #48
That show is really, reallly bad & more disgusting than even fox because they try to claim a higher EV_Ares Oct 2016 #31
Joe and Mika always lambast others for acting "self-righteous" sarae Oct 2016 #33
I believe, because really hard to figure those hypocripts out that all they are is self-promoters, EV_Ares Oct 2016 #36
I just said to my husband that it sounds like Trump TV this morning. Vinca Oct 2016 #32
Voter intimidation? Not a peep from them. sarae Oct 2016 #34
And that's a major story broken by their MSNBC colleague ! OnDoutside Oct 2016 #39
I beg all of you.... Stuckinthebush Oct 2016 #35
It's a bit like trying to kick the Diet Coke habit...you know it's bad for you, but you keep going OnDoutside Oct 2016 #38
Great analogy! Stuckinthebush Oct 2016 #40
haha sarae Oct 2016 #41
I beg all of you.... LenaBaby61 Oct 2016 #55
So nothing new. Boring Joe is a better name. nt Ilsa Oct 2016 #42
Is it medically possible to extricate his mouth from Trump's anal appendage? dalton99 Oct 2016 #45
Some of you are addicted to anxiety endorphins. These talking heads aren't journalists... LuvLoogie Oct 2016 #46
Only ONCE did Mika murmur "The foundation does good work..." and Joe gave it a backhanded CTyankee Oct 2016 #49
Not giving a rats ass MFM008 Oct 2016 #54
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drum roll please....Top s...»Reply #51