Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
20. What was done will depend on when his last military one was updated
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 03:04 PM
Apr 2017

Active clearance= you have a cleanrace and are in a job requiring one, so you are eligible to access classified information.

Current/inactive= you have had the investigation done and are still within the window of eligibility but are not currently in a job that requires a clearance. So while you meet all other requirements and your last investigation is still valid you can't access classified information because your not in a position requiring access. Sometimes a position requiring access is as simple as holding a specific rank that blanket requires it. So if you retire it goes current/inactive

Lapsed/experied= start over from scratch if you want a cleanrce again. If your current/inactive clearance goes 24 months without reinstatement, or you hit the mandatory renewal date first, your clearance is lapsed.

So who approved a cleanrace will depend on a lot of things. If he left the service with a fairly recent reinvestigation/renewal then barring going to a new position that required a cleanrace his clearance would be listed as current/inactive for up to 24 months and eligible for reinstatement without a new investigation.

I am seeing his retirement date listed as August 2014, but I am not clear if that was his date he left the position or his actual effective retirement date from the service. It can take anywhere from a few weeks to a couple months to process out as a retirement, then you are still on terminal leave until any leave you have accumulated is done. So it's possible that he could have not officially retired until mid November which would leave him eligible for reinstatement without a new investigation if the transition team requested it.

If he did have to renew and didn't disclose all those contacts it's a definite problem for him. And I wouldn't want to be the OPM investigator who handled it either.

Now Scary Spicer is blaming the DoD uponit7771 Apr 2017 #1
Pushing it so it's Obama's fault?? Satch59 Apr 2017 #2
You are in good company - asiliveandbreathe Apr 2017 #6
No. He may have applied for an interim clearance, but since he had already been removed... haele Apr 2017 #3
This is what they are looking for..the SC (security clearance application) - asiliveandbreathe Apr 2017 #4
My guess is fifthoffive Apr 2017 #7
What WH???? asiliveandbreathe Apr 2017 #10
I think he means the Trump WH ... Whiskeytide Apr 2017 #12
Flynn sat in on sec briefings before the POS was in the WH - asiliveandbreathe Apr 2017 #13
My guess too Phoenix61 Apr 2017 #11
Emails MFM008 Apr 2017 #5
It doesn't matter. OilemFirchen Apr 2017 #8
Transition teams often aren't vetted too harshly. NightWatcher Apr 2017 #9
Yeah, blame the guy that fired Flynn! .99center Apr 2017 #14
He was fired in 2014...why would they? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #15
Exactly--he was fired frazzled Apr 2017 #17
Generals are subject to be called up in case of national emergencies wishstar Apr 2017 #18
I didn't know that underpants Apr 2017 #21
All military officers are actually Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #24
Experts on MSNBC said his last security clearance was January 2016 wishstar Apr 2017 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author karynnj Apr 2017 #19
What was done will depend on when his last military one was updated Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #20
So no one in the Pentagon or IC watches RT? cheyanne Apr 2017 #22
No clue. The OPM does these checks and is largely removed from the DoD Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did the Obama Admin reapp...»Reply #20