Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onethatcares

(16,168 posts)

10. technically correct,

Reply to HAB911 (Original post)

Wed May 31, 2017, 04:25 PM

May 2017

and of course, Faux news would be the first to say that if Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama or anyone else on the Democratic side of the aisle had talks with the Russians and wanted to secure a private back channel to their leaders.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"collusion is not a crime"?? [View all] HAB911 May 2017 OP

Knew this was coming Johnny2X2X May 2017 #1

Well sure, they were just colluding on a surprise party for Donald marylandblue May 2017 #2

Nothing that sticks it to godless liberals get the red out May 2017 #3

I have heard someone in Intelligence say mchill May 2017 #4

It Can Be ProfessorGAC May 2017 #5

The argument is that there is no statute covering collusion, Kablooie May 2017 #6

I saw that trial balloon sharp_stick May 2017 #7

Collusion to break a law is a separate crime Cicada May 2017 #8

He might be technically correct. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #9

technically correct, onethatcares May 2017 #10