Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OnDoutside

(19,956 posts)

3. Yes a POS loser but they could previously compartmentalise shooters as mentally ill. This changes

Reply to JI7 (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 16, 2017, 07:26 AM

Jun 2017

that dynamic AND that it was someone supposedly on the Democratic side, which is not the norm. Perhaps we will find out that he used to vote Republican but was taken with the Sanders rhetoric.....and there are quite a few of them out there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What To Make Of What Morning Joe Said About The Last 2 Shooters [View all] All-In Jun 2017 OP

the guy had a history of being violent. he was a loser piece of shit JI7 Jun 2017 #1

Yes a POS loser but they could previously compartmentalise shooters as mentally ill. This changes OnDoutside Jun 2017 #3

he was not on the democratic side. he was anti hillary and voted for Jill stein JI7 Jun 2017 #5

In their view, he's anti Republican, and that's where being associated with Sanders hurts the OnDoutside Jun 2017 #6

for all their focus on islamic terrorists the fact is they are unlikely to target JI7 Jun 2017 #2

Targeted political violence is a different animal Lee-Lee Jun 2017 #4

And another example of "assault weapons" being used, something gunners tell us doesn't happen. Hoyt Jun 2017 #7