General Discussion

turtlerescue1

(1,013 posts)

6. Have lived long enough to have questions,

Wed Jul 11, 2012, 10:30 AM

Jul 2012

especially since of the "anonymity" of the "official" -ya gotta wonder the motive.

It is more frightening that there would be DNA testing to begin with. Put that with the UC Davis "incident"- "Welcome to the Monkey House".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Official: DNA ties '04 NYC death to Occupy protest (WTF is this article about?) [View all] johnnie Jul 2012 OP

No, I think you've read it correctly. aquart Jul 2012 #1

For that matter Drale Jul 2012 #18

I have given up on Yahoo for news. Their editorial standards (if you can call them coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #2

It was an AP report n/t johnnie Jul 2012 #4

AP is just about as bad, imo. I think it got taken over by coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #7

It is shittily written, but I am not getting out of it what you are... MADem Jul 2012 #3

I think the guy they questioned was in 2004 johnnie Jul 2012 #5

Yes--that loony-looking but fit fellow in the tape is the suspect. MADem Jul 2012 #28

they have video up here maddezmom Jul 2012 #16

The article with that video says that they aren't going after the protesters. MADem Jul 2012 #25

Have lived long enough to have questions, turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #6

They have DNA from the murder scene from eight years ago. MADem Jul 2012 #29

BUT why leak anything??? turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #32

To frighten the suspect. To let them KNOW they've got his DNA, even if they don't, really. MADem Jul 2012 #34

Worst. Murdoch. Propaganda. Ever. The 1% knows that Occupy is going to win. Zorra Jul 2012 #8

Since Occupy is leaderless and has no criteria for membership, anyone who says they are, is. FarCenter Jul 2012 #9

Ok I get it johnnie Jul 2012 #11

OWS did 9/11 too! ...oh no, that was the PNAC boys, nevermind. -eom Huey P. Long Jul 2012 #10

Why would you use the acronym WTF? randome Jul 2012 #12

Because the article makes little sense. johnnie Jul 2012 #17

I think the article makes sense but the headline, I admit, is over the top. randome Jul 2012 #20

Really? Zorra Jul 2012 #22

No--"There's no immediate evidence that the DNA belongs to the protesters MADem Jul 2012 #30

Really? No. What they wanted, and what they've done, is to make people afraid Zorra Jul 2012 #37

That quote is not my words--it's from the article. But you are wrong--there already HAS been a MADem Jul 2012 #38

I was wrong? WTF? Are you kidding me? Zorra Jul 2012 #43

You were wrong in that there WAS followup to this lousy story--that's all I meant. MADem Jul 2012 #46

Aw, gosh, looks like you were mistaken. Zorra Jul 2012 #42

If nothing else it is a poorly written headline. Poor as a FOX................ wandy Jul 2012 #13

Holy Crap, OWS has a Time Machine!!! Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #21

The NYPD is behind this WilliamPitt Jul 2012 #14

Didn't think about that (NYPD) johnnie Jul 2012 #19

Look at the front page of the New York Daily News WilliamPitt Jul 2012 #24

nailed it frylock Jul 2012 #26

See upthread--it was a fuckup. Lab tech working on Occupy case transferred DNA to Fox case. MADem Jul 2012 #39

Chris Hedges warned us: One Day We’ll All Be Terrorists Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #15

Transparent effort by NYPD and whoever is working with them to discredit the Occupy movement brentspeak Jul 2012 #23

Def Jim Warren Jul 2012 #27

No, just a lab fuckup--it is being widely reported, right now... MADem Jul 2012 #40

It was cross contamination. The same NYPD rep handled evidence at both scenes. smokey nj Jul 2012 #31

Yes--it looks like a false match due to police error contaminating evidence pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #35

The "member of the NYPD" was apparently one of their lab techs, if the reports are to be believed.NT MADem Jul 2012 #41

Didn't see this coming johnnie Jul 2012 #36

oogabooga fascisthunter Jul 2012 #33

Exactly. Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #44

This demonizing article is about their fear of Occupy. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #45