Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
46. You were wrong in that there WAS followup to this lousy story--that's all I meant.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 04:30 AM
Jul 2012

You said: There will be no followup to this phony story.

The police came out and said there was no connection between OWS and the CD player--that the "connection" was their own incompetent lab tech.

Obviously, they were testing the chain to see if they could find out who was the person/persons who chained open the door and disrupted the transportation system. They were not looking for a murderer when they tested that chain, they were looking for someone who caused chaos in the subway.

They ran the DNA and found that it matched a hit on the CD player--and someone felt a need to let the media know, either for money or what-have-you, that there was a connection.

Unfortunately for them and their reputations, it was learned during exclusionary testing that the "match" belonged to someone in the lab.

Now, the story is not focused in the slightest on OWS or even on the people who chained that door open, it is focused on the police lab, a bumbling lab tech, a possibility that cases have been compromised, and the fact that the place is apparently run very sloppily. No one is "afraid" of Occupy, no Occupier needs to be arrested for murder (though if they had found anything on that chain, they might have tried to get someone for disrupting public transportation), they're now afraid of slobs in the police lab drooling all over the evidence and making a conviction impossible owing to their slovenliness.

No, I think you've read it correctly. aquart Jul 2012 #1
For that matter Drale Jul 2012 #18
I have given up on Yahoo for news. Their editorial standards (if you can call them coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #2
It was an AP report n/t johnnie Jul 2012 #4
AP is just about as bad, imo. I think it got taken over by coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #7
It is shittily written, but I am not getting out of it what you are... MADem Jul 2012 #3
I think the guy they questioned was in 2004 johnnie Jul 2012 #5
Yes--that loony-looking but fit fellow in the tape is the suspect. MADem Jul 2012 #28
they have video up here maddezmom Jul 2012 #16
The article with that video says that they aren't going after the protesters. MADem Jul 2012 #25
Have lived long enough to have questions, turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #6
They have DNA from the murder scene from eight years ago. MADem Jul 2012 #29
BUT why leak anything??? turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #32
To frighten the suspect. To let them KNOW they've got his DNA, even if they don't, really. MADem Jul 2012 #34
Worst. Murdoch. Propaganda. Ever. The 1% knows that Occupy is going to win. Zorra Jul 2012 #8
Since Occupy is leaderless and has no criteria for membership, anyone who says they are, is. FarCenter Jul 2012 #9
Ok I get it johnnie Jul 2012 #11
OWS did 9/11 too! ...oh no, that was the PNAC boys, nevermind. -eom Huey P. Long Jul 2012 #10
Why would you use the acronym WTF? randome Jul 2012 #12
Because the article makes little sense. johnnie Jul 2012 #17
I think the article makes sense but the headline, I admit, is over the top. randome Jul 2012 #20
Really? Zorra Jul 2012 #22
No--"There's no immediate evidence that the DNA belongs to the protesters MADem Jul 2012 #30
Really? No. What they wanted, and what they've done, is to make people afraid Zorra Jul 2012 #37
That quote is not my words--it's from the article. But you are wrong--there already HAS been a MADem Jul 2012 #38
I was wrong? WTF? Are you kidding me? Zorra Jul 2012 #43
You were wrong in that there WAS followup to this lousy story--that's all I meant. MADem Jul 2012 #46
Aw, gosh, looks like you were mistaken. Zorra Jul 2012 #42
If nothing else it is a poorly written headline. Poor as a FOX................ wandy Jul 2012 #13
Holy Crap, OWS has a Time Machine!!! Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #21
The NYPD is behind this WilliamPitt Jul 2012 #14
Didn't think about that (NYPD) johnnie Jul 2012 #19
Look at the front page of the New York Daily News WilliamPitt Jul 2012 #24
nailed it frylock Jul 2012 #26
See upthread--it was a fuckup. Lab tech working on Occupy case transferred DNA to Fox case. MADem Jul 2012 #39
Chris Hedges warned us: One Day We’ll All Be Terrorists Junkdrawer Jul 2012 #15
Transparent effort by NYPD and whoever is working with them to discredit the Occupy movement brentspeak Jul 2012 #23
Def Jim Warren Jul 2012 #27
No, just a lab fuckup--it is being widely reported, right now... MADem Jul 2012 #40
It was cross contamination. The same NYPD rep handled evidence at both scenes. smokey nj Jul 2012 #31
Yes--it looks like a false match due to police error contaminating evidence pinboy3niner Jul 2012 #35
The "member of the NYPD" was apparently one of their lab techs, if the reports are to be believed.NT MADem Jul 2012 #41
Didn't see this coming johnnie Jul 2012 #36
oogabooga fascisthunter Jul 2012 #33
Exactly. Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #44
This demonizing article is about their fear of Occupy. Fire Walk With Me Jul 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Official: DNA ties '04 NY...»Reply #46