Latest Breaking News

bemildred

(90,061 posts)

179. +1. nt

Reply to yurbud (Reply #111)

Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:48 AM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

193 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge orders Obama administration to release new Clinton emails [View all] seafan Jun 2016 OP

How so? flamingdem Jun 2016 #1

There was a very loose movement of Hillary staffers between State and the Foundation. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #4

"a very loose movement of Hillary staffers:" yeah, they could be literally shitting themselves now thereismore Jun 2016 #15

Ooops! I didn't mean it that way!!! BillZBubb Jun 2016 #24

Oh, yes you did.... pangaia Jun 2016 #127

lol Vattel Jun 2016 #98

. merrily Jun 2016 #172

Who gives a shit about the nature of other's bowel movements? L. Coyote Jun 2016 #184

"... to hand over to the Republican National Committee" puffy socks Jun 2016 #37

Do we really want a general election in which the Republicans constantly sling mud JDPriestly Jun 2016 #80

Theyre going to do it anyway...in fact most of the garbage about puffy socks Jun 2016 #94

Please Don't lie about Bernie to make your points askeptic Jun 2016 #99

Stop lying for Bernie puffy socks Jun 2016 #103

Oh- so he HAS released tax returns - just not to your liking askeptic Jun 2016 #109

so where are the tax returns? puffy socks Jun 2016 #135

So where are the transcripts? dorkzilla Jun 2016 #140

stop derailing the conversation here. grasswire Jun 2016 #165

Clinton's made 27 Million $$$$ in 2014, Sanders made 200 Thousand. Of COURSE Clinton will have more newthinking Jun 2016 #157

Look at your own link. It says he released them April 15th ... 12 days after he said he would do so. ebayfool Jun 2016 #169

He wasn't released everything. Chicago1980 Jun 2016 #104

Wrong. The FULL return was released April 15th ... 12 days after he said he would do so. ebayfool Jun 2016 #168

Speech transcripts aren't normally released... Chicago1980 Jun 2016 #191

Get over it... Chicago1980 Jun 2016 #101

^^^^^^ This times 10 ^^^^^ laserhaas Jun 2016 #108

This is the second time in two days ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #133

What percentage of the delegates does Hillary need to have to be elected on the first vote JDPriestly Jun 2016 #148

The majority of them. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #150

Slinging mud is what they do. And they'd find plenty to sling at Bernie. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #144

You should read Bernie's book. The title is in my signature line. JDPriestly Jun 2016 #147

Bernie has never run a national campaign. He won't know what hit him. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #152

Either has Hillary. What a silly meme. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #181

Her Majesty and her DLC minions own the coming debacle eom LiberalElite Jun 2016 #163

Pay for play in State Dept (USAID is part of DOS) contracting. leveymg Jun 2016 #57

Hillary gave a special State Department post to an ex-fundraiser — even as he was ..... seafan Jun 2016 #85

The RNC is not dumb. They are going after the Foundation. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #2

Indeed. The emails are the side show. libdem4life Jun 2016 #11

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Jun 2016 #38

Only if they actually find something this time which would be a surprise for cstanleytech Jun 2016 #42

The Foundation is, indeed, the smoking gun. seafan Jun 2016 #93

Thanks seafan, recommended saidsimplesimon Jun 2016 #3

This will not affect her prospects. George II Jun 2016 #5

she was already badly Berned reddread Jun 2016 #14

"Badly Berned"? 2,312 to 1,545 George II Jun 2016 #18

tuesdays coming reddread Jun 2016 #21

2,312 to 1,545 AlbertCat Jun 2016 #56

Well put. Boggles the mind...if still intact and not merged into libdem4life Jun 2016 #64

The guy has more balls than a pitching machine!!! pangaia Jun 2016 #130

And I think he still drives his own car and can sprint through the airport!! libdem4life Jun 2016 #132

His Secret Service nickname is Intrepid. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #178

Ugh, so true. mountain grammy Jun 2016 #74

Had there been a level playing field, Bernie would have been subjected to the scrutiny Hillary has. Laser102 Jun 2016 #114

subjected to the scrutiny Hillary has. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #117

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Jun 2016 #124

Mediocre is right. pangaia Jun 2016 #129

Always using the not voted for Supers in tallies. bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #66

Are they not the delegates now that the Sanders people are counting on to bail out his campaign? George II Jun 2016 #87

If the superdelegates had already voted then Bernie couldn't appeal to them. bjo59 Jun 2016 #106

In an interview with Jake Tapper a DNC official libdem4life Jun 2016 #185

No problem. She'll have a majority of the pledged delegates anyway. George II Jun 2016 #186

To paraphrase hillary greiner3 Jun 2016 #75

Going to dig into the Clinton foundatiuon Autumn Jun 2016 #6

Yes. Republicans hate anything and anyone that DURHAM D Jun 2016 #22

The disadvanted like the Clintons, their hangers on, and big money interests. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #26

We all know that for a fact don't we? That's what they do, but in this instance I think they Autumn Jun 2016 #28

if they wanted to help the poor they roguevalley Jun 2016 #70

Bernie gives only 4% to charity. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #173

Oh you mean like the people of Haiti? dorkzilla Jun 2016 #47

or fracking and the sale of fighter jets to Saudi, Arabia. Contrary1 Jun 2016 #59

The Saudis have been a US client for a long time. cheapdate Jun 2016 #162

Where did all of that Foundation money go? Apparently, not to Haiti. seafan Jun 2016 #97

Some of us waiting more patiently than others dorkzilla Jun 2016 #110

funny you should mention that reddread Jun 2016 #137

I knew the effort in Haiti NJCher Jun 2016 #175

I just heard on CNN the Clinton Foundation is one of the top charities donating 86% of money raised. Laser102 Jun 2016 #115

It is -- the "10%" number is a RW smear obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #139

Exactly Carolina Jun 2016 #81

Cover up attempts and all. merrily Jun 2016 #180

I don't get it yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #7

Wouldn't she rule from just a legal perspective, hopefully not biased, at least one would hope. RKP5637 Jun 2016 #8

Of course but this doesn't seem like a necessity yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #10

The courts are not tasked with determining 'necessity' JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #16

Rooting out possible corruption does help the country. -none Jun 2016 #36

^^ This ^^ Scuba Jun 2016 #39

Reverse the Party name and you have Republican Party logic. gordianot Jun 2016 #50

Quite true! Many had best realize they could do far worse than HRC as president. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #52

but we could likewise do FAR better. nt dorkzilla Jun 2016 #63

Yes, definitely! I agree 1,000% n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #76

Yes it does, if it helps to get corruption out of politics dorkzilla Jun 2016 #54

++++^^^^ nt hopemountain Jun 2016 #82

Thank you pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #131

I feel like we've entered an alternate universe... dorkzilla Jun 2016 #136

It's been a real eye-opener pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #138

Not part of some...sports mentality NJCher Jun 2016 #193

Judicial decisions aren't based on what helps/hurts a political party. winter is coming Jun 2016 #67

Or shouldn't be nxylas Jun 2016 #78

Think again, recall the SCOTUS Coup 2000 decision Carolina Jun 2016 #90

wow grasswire Jun 2016 #166

The fact that laws may have been broken is a moot point to you? tularetom Jun 2016 #23

Perhaps she's actually honest? BillZBubb Jun 2016 #27

And doing her job. elleng Jun 2016 #41

She did not rule "for the Republicans." She ruled on a point of law. totodeinhere Jun 2016 #60

Would you be applauding... jmowreader Jun 2016 #118

I would have no problem with that. And Bernie has already said let it all out. n/t totodeinhere Jun 2016 #125

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #107

As usual with any Clinton "scandal," there's no "there" there. stopbush Jun 2016 #9

telling lies used to be frowned upon reddread Jun 2016 #17

You'd think that Hillary Clinton OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #122

You'd think people would be able to see the difference between illegal activity stopbush Jun 2016 #123

"...activity that maybe broke a few in-house rules." OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #126

Wow! Just WoW! Melissa G Jun 2016 #156

So the Clinton Foundation "helped" Haitians by setting up sweatshops for "cheap labor" senz Jun 2016 #170

If you could break this up into smaller cohesive texts senz Jun 2016 #171

You would think after 25 years the Clinton's would be as transparent Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #141

Right. People who release 20 years of tax records stopbush Jun 2016 #143

Private server. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #145

i couldn't care less. The emails are irrelevant and this is another REPUBLICAN witchhunt MariaThinks Jun 2016 #12

Bernie doesn't have a stash of 30,000 emails he tried to hide from the State Department. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #31

yes, bernie was not a sos MariaThinks Jun 2016 #44

Nor did he lie to the American people for a year about something he was required to do. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #49

no other sos has a bunch of emails they've hidden from the country - so what is your point? Schema Thing Jun 2016 #91

And the judge couldn't care less what MariaThinks... Wilms Jun 2016 #40

what a useless comment. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #45

. Wilms Jun 2016 #51

Don't know you're talking about but I found the comment to be quite entertaining. nc4bo Jun 2016 #153

Maria cares what MariaThinks, and she shares. Good work! Maria gets a gold star and a cookie! leveymg Jun 2016 #61

!!!! nc4bo Jun 2016 #154

I almost choked on my water after reading the post above. libdem4life Jun 2016 #134

Seriously? I thought there weren't no more emails to be had. For real. nt thereismore Jun 2016 #13

There are always more emails to be found. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #33

These are emails between Clinton AIdes and US AID which is under the State Department karynnj Jun 2016 #79

I read that only 10% of CF donations go to charity. Where does the 90% go? nt thereismore Jun 2016 #19

89% goes to charity. nt DURHAM D Jun 2016 #25

It's good to see. I hope the word "programming" means the same as charity. nt thereismore Jun 2016 #62

Yeah, Ann Coulter told you that Jaybird Jun 2016 #34

Drip drip drip tularetom Jun 2016 #20

Release of new emails ordered people Jun 2016 #29

Not good for Judge Jackson's prospects, either. Octafish Jun 2016 #30

Me thinks Bernie would not have a problem nominating her greiner3 Jun 2016 #77

Here's how the story will play out: Gene Debs Jun 2016 #32

We'll see. I hope Obama doesn't go down that road. His legacy is clean up until now. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #35

At the end of the day I'm not so sure he is Hillary's biggest fan. corkhead Jun 2016 #43

He shouldn't be. By not distancing himself from her, he's tarnishing his own image. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #46

he will not endorse her unless she gets hopemountain Jun 2016 #89

The problem is, he has tacitly endorsed her through the whole process. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #121

not sure about that. he may be hopemountain Jun 2016 #164

Given past history it is more likely that it will play out with cstanleytech Jun 2016 #48

Benghazi has always been bullshit. This is not. There is actually real evidence here. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #53

"There is actually real evidence here." And that is? cstanleytech Jun 2016 #68

Evidence of what? What damage was caused by Hillary's private server? kwassa Jun 2016 #71

There is prima facie evidence of crimes in the emails. That's why the FBI is investigating her. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #120

Damage is the only question. kwassa Jun 2016 #146

If you really believe that lmbradford Jun 2016 #159

Next time a cop wants to give you a speeding ticket, ask him what damage? No harm, no foul right? BillZBubb Jun 2016 #160

So they are going to give a Hillary a ticket? Wow. kwassa Jun 2016 #188

Excuse me for thinking you had an iota of intelligence. I won't make that mistake again. BillZBubb Jun 2016 #190

I have plenty of intelligence. You don't have a case of a substantive crime. kwassa Jun 2016 #192

Tired of the rightwing spin here on the Clinton Foundation? yallerdawg Jun 2016 #55

Maybe its because Andy823 Jun 2016 #100

I bellieve you are correct! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #105

Oh, gosh, I don't know. Could it be the emails indicate something criminal may have been going on? BillZBubb Jun 2016 #161

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #58

You seem upset that people won't be able to pimp Republican agitprop geek tragedy Jun 2016 #69

yep 840high Jun 2016 #72

I hate the effing RNC JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #65

The Clinton Foundation investigation is where the rubber meets the road. seafan Jun 2016 #73

Recommend for exposure... KoKo Jun 2016 #84

Another Big whoosh.... keylargo Jun 2016 #86

I believe you are right. trudyco Jun 2016 #88

Excellent post... lying birds of a feather Carolina Jun 2016 #92

Every time I read story like this, I feel like I need a bleach bath. nc4bo Jun 2016 #149

He really needs to be in prison. yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #176

Well that's a bummer for all of us.... Chakaconcarne Jun 2016 #83

^^^This^^^ MissDeeds Jun 2016 #95

Why would State have to clear these emails? This is a problem. morningfog Jun 2016 #96

"The RNC sued the aid agency..." is all you need to know tandot Jun 2016 #102

sued for INFORMATION. INFORMATION!!!!!! dorkzilla Jun 2016 #112

I'm not a Hillary fan, but I'm baffled by this. Lying us to get into war, torture in violation of yurbud Jun 2016 #111

So we should give her a pass because of the misdeeds of the Republicans? dorkzilla Jun 2016 #113

I would not give her a pass, but I would go after the other guys first. yurbud Jun 2016 #116

So everything should just STOP, so we can go back 8 years to get the other guys first? dorkzilla Jun 2016 #119

Despite appearances, the other guys still control the government. nt OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #128

the statute of limitations has passed. grasswire Jun 2016 #167

...which is why we keep turning over Nazi war criminal after 70 years? yurbud Jun 2016 #189

Our side always is held to a higher standard because we expect a higher ALBliberal Jun 2016 #142

+1. nt bemildred Jun 2016 #179

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #151

Just curious, did the RNC/GOP/Bush/Cheney Admin release USAID communications 2banon Jun 2016 #155

Who is ready for Hillary? jillan Jun 2016 #158

I'm ready. She'll be a great President. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #174

The Federal Prison System yourpaljoey Jun 2016 #177

Can't they go on strike like the Senate Supreme Court Dodgers? bucolic_frolic Jun 2016 #182

The judge's wikipedia page Babel_17 Jun 2016 #183

Nothing to fear FlaGranny Jun 2016 #187