Latest Breaking News

cstanleytech

(27,212 posts)

180. I suspect its not that she did anything criminal

Reply to All in it together (Reply #175)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 08:40 PM

Jun 2016

rather its more likely along the lines of trying not to provide free ammo to Trump and Bernie while leaving Hillary unarmed and causing it to look like the government tried to rig the election in favor of Bernie or Trump.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

217 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Department Blocks Release Of Hillary Clinton-Era TPP Emails Until After The Election [View all] antigop Jun 2016 OP

Outrageous. nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #1

Sanders has lost: This more propaganda from a dying campaign. lewebley3 Jun 2016 #62

So the State department isn't holding them back? What? nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #65

It's a moot point: Hillary has done nothing wrong lewebley3 Jun 2016 #73

Lol. Please. nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #81

I'm not religious. katsy Jun 2016 #83

Russell's teapot SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #125

Ty. Exactly 👍🏼 nt katsy Jun 2016 #134

What you said. avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #143

You seem to know nothing about Hillary's history OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #96

the problem with HRC is that we do know her history. This ia a deal breaker for me. I know she wants roguevalley Jun 2016 #103

Unless you were actually considering voting for her I doubt its a deal breaker. cstanleytech Jun 2016 #179

That would be b4ecause they haven't held the positions in gov't she has rpannier Jun 2016 #182

We already know she did her job and worked to get it passed though. nt cstanleytech Jun 2016 #183

And I think people are entitled to know the process rpannier Jun 2016 #185

If she was a total unknown maybe but shes been in the public light for decades cstanleytech Jun 2016 #190

What you said nikto Jun 2016 #203

Then why not release them zentrum Jun 2016 #120

Why would we vote for anyone linked to an FBI investigation SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #127

Perhaps not. But if information that would harm Hillary's political future is being withheld JDPriestly Jun 2016 #133

You may be right that she has done nothing illegal . . . markpkessinger Jun 2016 #145

Says you GRhodes Jun 2016 #154

This is about the TPP, not "wrong doing" blackspade Jun 2016 #167

If she did nothing wrong why hide her TPP emails All in it together Jun 2016 #175

I suspect its not that she did anything criminal cstanleytech Jun 2016 #180

Is that what you repeat to yourself over and over hoping beyond hope that it's true? rhett o rick Jun 2016 #196

I have to repeat because Sanders repeatedly lie: lewebley3 Jun 2016 #214

ibtimes is a Sanders propaganda outfit? (n/t) thesquanderer Jun 2016 #70

The International Business Times sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #92

You should probably look that word up... AzDar Jun 2016 #116

No, the American voters have lost. n/t woodsprite Jun 2016 #128

This only impacts Bernie Sanders? GRhodes Jun 2016 #153

thanks for showcasing your tacit approval with an indefensible and silly dodge stupidicus Jun 2016 #165

This has nothing to do with Sanders and everything to do with transparency in politics. PoliticalMalcontent Jun 2016 #205

No body is saying nothing to see here: Sanders people whinning lewebley3 Jun 2016 #213

Democracy, American style. jalan48 Jun 2016 #2

Democracy, Planet-Earth Style maxsolomon Jun 2016 #157

I'm shocked! Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #3

All those surprised by this, holler now Scalded Nun Jun 2016 #4

"The Gold Standard" will not be discussed... think Jun 2016 #5

Its has been discussed and and debunked: as well as Sander failing campaign lewebley3 Jun 2016 #63

So she won't sign the TPP then right? think Jun 2016 #86

Heh :) MisterFred Jun 2016 #122

They will scream wildly, if you suggest huldufólk or elves don't exist! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #173

Is this a closed loop tape? libdem4life Jun 2016 #137

Obama covers his butt too Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #6

Obama is very honest and: Has most of the time made the right choices lewebley3 Jun 2016 #66

Corrupt as hell. If everything that needs to be released was she would have not gotten bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #7

*shrugs* christx30 Jun 2016 #8

not like trump... in a kinder gentler way tk2kewl Jun 2016 #11

No, she's not racist "like Trump" tularetom Jun 2016 #31

What has the Democratic party cone to ripcord Jun 2016 #97

Setting the bar pretty low, don't you think? n/t markpkessinger Jun 2016 #142

Well, she's our nominee. Not much can be done about that christx30 Jun 2016 #174

I don't think Sarah Palin is racist, either. Lets vote for her. Hoppy Jun 2016 #144

At least! "Thank heaven (or thank Gawd!) for small mercies! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #159

Could it be that she is totally fucking lying about her stance on the TPP? djean111 Jun 2016 #9

I do have a bet with my sister that KXL will get approved within her first year in office. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #24

I think you'll win that bet. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #56

It depends on the price of oil. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #68

She wasn't lying. She was evolving. Gary 50 Jun 2016 #51

No, she didn't say she was against the TPP elljay Jun 2016 #117

See, we of the unwashed masses don't have the lawyers's jargon dictionary libdem4life Jun 2016 #138

Skeptical of what? elljay Jun 2016 #161

Skeptical of real evolution. The weasly words, lawyer speak... libdem4life Jun 2016 #189

Got it elljay Jun 2016 #210

Yes. Peace !! libdem4life Jun 2016 #212

Oh snap! That ain't what she was saying! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #169

Exactly. She's always shrewd, even when she's not being very smart. cui bono Jun 2016 #198

She always leaves herself a way out. colorado_ufo Jun 2016 #200

I remember seeing an interview... Goldfish Jun 2016 #141

The emails regarding TTP and the Wall Street speech transcripts Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #94

I would say it lying and that the papers on TPP prove it. jwirr Jun 2016 #113

Pretty much. Clinton is imploding the party, but accuses Bernie of the results. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #123

Yep...we are being forced to be complicit with all of this crap. libdem4life Jun 2016 #139

why, how transparent of them mooseprime Jun 2016 #10

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #12

Wow Mark 750 Jun 2016 #13

Ahhh, crap! Duval Jun 2016 #14

Sneaky Hillary & her DC establishment machinery in action. AGAIN. Triana Jun 2016 #15

So very true ! ciaobaby Jun 2016 #19

The worst of it is that this is what the LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #27

It's amazing that an honest politician who wants to work for PEOPLE & can't be bought by corps Triana Jun 2016 #35

Shunned by the establishment. I know LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #41

I wish you were wrong, but damn .. I cannot dispute a word of your excellent rant. n/t 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #32

+ 1000 LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #37

. libodem Jun 2016 #48

+1000 Triana Jun 2016 #79

. libodem Jun 2016 #99

Bringing the truth! dchill Jun 2016 #64

So sad. So true. agracie Jun 2016 #80

You're so right! I weep for our country and the world donf Jun 2016 #89

well said! green917 Jun 2016 #95

yup Agony Jun 2016 #163

I'm sticking with Bernie all the way to the Revolution! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #176

This message was self-deleted by its author SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #177

there you go again azureblue Jun 2016 #184

+a brazillion!!! cui bono Jun 2016 #199

WHAT A GORGEOUS BRICK WALL! reddread Jun 2016 #16

Yet not a word from the Hillbots shawn703 Jun 2016 #17

Their talking points are predictable AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #33

you noticed that too huh? MidwestTech Jun 2016 #46

It's what you do.... SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #178

They Know The Fix Is In - And The Rest Of Us Are Chumps For Still Believing In Democracy cantbeserious Jun 2016 #58

The talking points are in: drokhole Jun 2016 #82

Infuriating! TryLogic Jun 2016 #18

Gotta protect the chosen candidate n/t geomon666 Jun 2016 #20

At least she's consistent in her efforts to not be transparent! lastone Jun 2016 #21

Um yeah. SammyWinstonJack Jun 2016 #22

So the State department is running interference in the election process ? azurnoir Jun 2016 #23

Sure looks that way. n/t warrprayer Jun 2016 #25

yeah, protecting her in every matter. grasswire Jun 2016 #104

Orders from the top, more than likely Hydra Jun 2016 #186

Well, we wouldn't want to confuse the voters. n/t malthaussen Jun 2016 #26

Ask the average person at the mall for an opinion on the LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #38

To be fair, I think it has been quite a while since most politicians cared what people think, djean111 Jun 2016 #47

When the TPP is signed into law and people LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #55

if the nominees of both parties are the same... Angel Martin Jun 2016 #105

That is not remotely true. djean111 Jun 2016 #114

First ask them do they vote. YOHABLO Jun 2016 #201

It's a given that they don't. And of those LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #202

Wasn't Obama supposed to be the . . FairWinds Jun 2016 #28

lol, we're in "wtf, why not?" mode I take it Babel_17 Jun 2016 #29

It pays to have friends in high places. -nt CrispyQ Jun 2016 #30

Lovely democracy we have in the U.S. Skwmom Jun 2016 #34

That speaks volumes. Will she sign it on the first or second day in office? Vinca Jun 2016 #36

It'll be on the podium during the Inaugural Address and will be LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #43

It will be signed before the next president takes office but after the election. RichVRichV Jun 2016 #50

No words. 840high Jun 2016 #39

obviously there is something there Javaman Jun 2016 #40

Yep. Like the speech transcripts. Hillary is about as LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #45

Things like this are why Kall Jun 2016 #42

They do not support democracy felix_numinous Jun 2016 #44

More campaign ammunition for her opponent. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #49

The reason Obama has asked for the delay? She was working under his direction. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #52

And what about Kerry? grasswire Jun 2016 #107

You see, there is no cover up. That is the part that drives people like you insane. You and the GOP. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #129

Stunning and obtuse. libdem4life Jun 2016 #140

Where does it say creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #195

Hillary Supporters Want Their "First Woman President" Lean Jun 2016 #53

And That Will Improve America How cantbeserious Jun 2016 #59

We'll finally be able to start fixing what the Republicans jeff47 Jun 2016 #111

HRC Is A Conservative Democrat - She Will Enable Ever More Corptocracy cantbeserious Jun 2016 #155

Yes...and when the party "falls" as in the post you replied to jeff47 Jun 2016 #217

No, they did NOT say they won't release them "until after the election", they said... George II Jun 2016 #54

Not an assumption. Scalded Nun Jun 2016 #71

But that is not what they said. What they said was reworded by the writer for sensationalism... George II Jun 2016 #72

It's insulting GRhodes Jun 2016 #194

In answer to your question ... Nihil Jun 2016 #211

They also said "The check is in the mail" and jeff47 Jun 2016 #112

No transcripts. No TPP e-mails. This is the candidate that Democrats want? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #57

It's what the right wing Democrats and the corporate media wants. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #98

K&R dchill Jun 2016 #60

You think the Obama transparency is a bit murky. Just wait. JEB Jun 2016 #61

we're not allowed to know what we're voting for, and Dems are fine with this MisterP Jun 2016 #67

and why the party has super delegates. nt grasswire Jun 2016 #109

Sounds a lot like The Wire season 4. Kablooie Jun 2016 #69

This is Obama telling the American Public d_legendary1 Jun 2016 #74

Wall Street allowed us to have marriage equality awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #75

Ha...I didnt post thus ..last night (early am) laserhaas Jun 2016 #76

Final Straw. I've had it. Paper Roses Jun 2016 #77

It's amazing SmittynMo Jun 2016 #85

.that^ 840high Jun 2016 #101

+1000 nt Javaman Jun 2016 #108

thank you PR grasswire Jun 2016 #110

We're gonna need a bigger train...... SmittynMo Jun 2016 #132

Yes - The Party Left Me - I Did Not Leave The Party cantbeserious Jun 2016 #162

^^this^^^ I have had it as well... Agony Jun 2016 #168

If you vote for this shit you at responsible for what happens, don't come crying later. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #78

But don't worry,,,,, SmittynMo Jun 2016 #84

But she is a woman and looks Presidential... coyote Jun 2016 #87

Whew! Us Loyal Democrats dodged a bullet there! lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #88

I see this backfiring on them....... Land of Enchantment Jun 2016 #90

From your link: Feds try to quash Republicans' lawsuit over Clinton messages ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #91

Obstruction of justice. moondust Jun 2016 #93

Great news! Gman Jun 2016 #100

OMG, Hillary wrote and received emails!! Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #102

Ohhhh NO,,, EMAILS,,,,, Oh the horror of it all! Cryptoad Jun 2016 #106

Where is the picture of Hillary saying Gary 50 Jun 2016 #135

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #172

The only thing to fear is the truth ... nikto Jun 2016 #204

So we should just believe politicians? katsy Jun 2016 #115

Those emails will show her bedrock support and statecraft machinations for TPP. AntiBank Jun 2016 #148

Well that clears up any question over whether Obama will let his DOJ indict her riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #118

Let's assume this is action is a template Hydra Jun 2016 #188

That's all very plausible. Still sucks for Bernie though nt riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #191

Bernie knew what he was getting into Hydra Jun 2016 #192

Honestly, I'm actually relieved for him. Climate change is upon us riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #193

Who could have predicted this? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #119

Never even crossed my mind. Enthusiast Jun 2016 #124

This should not be a surprise. MisterFred Jun 2016 #121

This message was self-deleted by its author N.Y. to Paris Jun 2016 #126

clinton tpo emails 3hummingbirds Jun 2016 #130

How can anyone seriously consider voting for Hillary when her e-mails and her speeches JDPriestly Jun 2016 #131

Mmmm...I love the smell of transparency in the morning.... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #136

"COG" ReRe Jun 2016 #146

rigging the election. Cobalt Violet Jun 2016 #147

way to hand fucking Trumpf a steel-forged hammer on 2 points AntiBank Jun 2016 #149

The establishment doesn't even bother to hide their corruption anymore. mudstump Jun 2016 #150

Of course Obama did...protecting his legacy you know. JimDandy Jun 2016 #151

Of course....nothing like a lack of transparency Chakaconcarne Jun 2016 #152

Anonymous "bat light" request LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #156

Good. Dr. Strange Jun 2016 #158

Very discouraging, in my opinion. ZombieHorde Jun 2016 #160

I'd like to hear her opinion on this stupidicus Jun 2016 #164

So no actual reason for the delay....except for politics. blackspade Jun 2016 #166

The FOIA office is overwhelmed creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #197

Having worked in government archives and on FOIA requests specifically.... blackspade Jun 2016 #209

Perhaps where you worked creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #215

How perfectly appropriate. Business, as usual. nt Zorra Jun 2016 #170

Not Surprising At All colsohlibgal Jun 2016 #171

It's well known zentrum Jun 2016 #181

The State Department represents people who want Trump to win. mia Jun 2016 #187

Cornel West was right. Scuba Jun 2016 #206

I hope even Secretary Clinton supporters can appreciate how politically motivated this is Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #207

And on to the courts we go. Vinca Jun 2016 #208

Isn't it interesting how tax payers can fund these e-mails without having access? MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #216