Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Bernie and Jane Sanders, under FBI investigation for bank fraud, hire lawyers [View all]Persisted
(290 posts)29. Actually....several Bernie supporters posted an article last night that
stated that Jane Sanders overpaid for the property by 4 mil.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie and Jane Sanders, under FBI investigation for bank fraud, hire lawyers [View all]
TomCADem
Jun 2017
OP
For sure...how he has time to be prez w all the lies he spreads and golf is beyond me
Alice11111
Jun 2017
#15
This complaint was filed over a year ago why didn't Sanders address it then? nt
Persisted
Jun 2017
#30
Okay....you've listed 2 Democrats not under federal investigation for bank fraud.
Persisted
Jun 2017
#31
in a small state wouldn't this not be too unusual . everyone would have more of a connection to each
JI7
Jun 2017
#147
Skinner never mentioned taxes. He indicated that BS should be treated as a Democrat.
Persisted
Jun 2017
#141
"pledging" millions to a school/charity & then not donating-something Trump has done countless times
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#18
10 million dollars for 33 acres. bank was willing to accept "pledged money" that is not the same as
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#17
oh so the bank got buildings & sold- and the land was sold to "another developer" 33 acres for 10mil
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#21
The buildings were not foreclosed until May 2017 since BC still owed the bank $3.7 million.
TexasTowelie
Jun 2017
#25
what did the bank lose? They didn't own the property, they weren't the sellers. They made the loan p
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#158
The kind of land we all wish we could have bought for 100 an acre 100 years ago :P
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#23
Apparently the Archdiocese is claiming they got 10 mil on a 6 mil property.....
Persisted
Jun 2017
#39
Um....you've conflated assesed value and appraised value. She paid 10 mil on a 6 mil appraisal....
Persisted
Jun 2017
#56
I did not say the church is making money - I said that the land was sold in 2 pieces for a total of
karynnj
Jun 2017
#78
Isn't Tony P a very close friend of Sanders who did the bridge loan on the original deal?
Persisted
Jun 2017
#109
He is also a major philanthropist who has done many good things for Burlington and Vermont
karynnj
Jun 2017
#111
It's also unsurprising the continued unfounded accusations against others who are
R B Garr
Jun 2017
#125
The bank/agent probably sues because they want that 4 million "fee" they wrote into the contract.
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#159
Just being listed by someone else on a loan application does not bind them or their estate
karynnj
Jun 2017
#114
I'm not saying it would be a sucessful claim. But would you appreciate the possible
Persisted
Jun 2017
#118
Like with Trump, going after the money, I would like to see both tax returns.
pirateshipdude
Jun 2017
#65
If we base an argument on hypocrisy, then it is all of our problem. Eom
pirateshipdude
Jun 2017
#122
Weaver seems to think that that means it was all good or their responsibility? Hmmmm
Madam45for2923
Jun 2017
#73
He's spreading responsibility. Which is what makes me think a SAR has been filed. nt.
Persisted
Jun 2017
#103
Aha Makes sense about responsibility What it SAR? I tried to google it. Is it related to this?
Madam45for2923
Jun 2017
#110
This investigation exists because of the events that led up to the closing of Burlington College.
hrmjustin
Jun 2017
#90
If the bank filed an SAR, are they being manipulated by the Vermont Republican? nt
Persisted
Jun 2017
#94
Sanders is going around the country presumably speaking for the Democratic Party....
George II
Jun 2017
#131
Certainly the Democratic party bears no responsibility for this particular turn of events.
Persisted
Jun 2017
#134
Explain that to all the republicans who will jump on this and use it for all they can get out of it.
George II
Jun 2017
#139
Funny; I don't recall a single Sanders supporting the baseless Benghazi nonesense
Chasstev365
Jun 2017
#87
Has it been proven and how did the post leap to assuming Bernie was in on it?
Chasstev365
Jun 2017
#93
Not in a court of law but loan documents pretty much show she lied about how much the
hrmjustin
Jun 2017
#96
She did not lie. "Pledged" donations aren't the same as money in hand. Banks contract allowed for "p
Sunlei
Jun 2017
#160
Is this more 'Crooked Hillary! e-mails! e-mails!' - the Trumpsters trying to create scandals about
LeftishBrit
Jun 2017
#155