Trump attorney wants to propose a 'counter-judgment' in $355M civil fraud case: court docs

[onenote]

45. Actually, its not.

It's raising an objection based on the rules of Civil Procedure in New York. While the judge has concluded that a hearing isn't necessary, he responded by giving Trump's attorneys an opportunity to point out any discrepancies between the judgment filed by the AG with the Clerk and the judge's decision. They have responded by pointing out that the judgment filed with the Clerk contains the wrong date for interest to accrue with respect to the judgment against Weisselberg and the wrong addresses for the defendants. While these may seem like minor discrepancies, they are an example of why there is a "counter-proposal" procedure.