Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(19,243 posts)
44. What are you hunting with, gold bullets?
Fri Dec 26, 2014, 04:06 PM
Dec 2014


But seriously, you can get into hunting for under $500 total (gun, ammo, scope, clothing, misc. equipment, license, etc) if you realize you don't need the newest, shiniest gadgets on the market.

A single-shot Rossi or NEF rifle, mil-surp. Mosin Nagant, or single-shot shotgun will set you back less than $200. If you step up to a pump-action shotgun, you can get a Mossberg 2-barrel combo that will allow you to hunt both waterfowl and deer for under $300. A basic 4X or 3-9X scope and a few boxes of generic softpoint ammo will set you back another $100.

And the great thing is that, once you buy the hardware, it lasts for years. The guns should last generations if well-cared for.

The butchers around here charge a couple dollars a pound for processing a deer, and if you are moderately skilled with a knife you can do the butchering in your garage or backyard. You can then turn steak into hamburger with a decent food processor if you feel like it: http://www.thekitchn.com/how-to-grind-your-own-meat-in-134272

Me? I like a more relaxed hunting experience, where I can stroll through the woods on nice days, so I hunt small game with a $100 pellet rifle from Walmart: http://www.walmart.com/ip/Ruger-Blackhawk-Elite/27678724



Amazingly accurate and surprisingly lethal on rabbits and squirrel out to 40 yards with headshots, ammo is everywhere and costs under $10/500 pellets. With a 6-mo hunting season and very generous bag limits, you can bag a lot of meat for not much money.
Below the post was an ad stating "join the NRA" Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #1
"The Toxic Substances Control Act exempts cartridges and shells from regulation" arcane1 Dec 2014 #2
There was no way the court was going to permit the EPA to effectively institute gun control branford Dec 2014 #3
Many hunters do not use these types of bullets anymore. At least those who care about the jwirr Dec 2014 #4
I never use lead in wilderness shooting... Only at the range. Adrahil Dec 2014 #5
A lot of my friends belong to Ducks Unlimited. They understand that if they use the lead and the jwirr Dec 2014 #6
Yep. I'm not a hunter, but I want to avoid the lead inadvertently getting into food supply. Adrahil Dec 2014 #14
And I want to keep the lead from getting into our water supply duhneece Dec 2014 #35
They are fired into artificial berms, which are broken down and cleaned every 5 years. Adrahil Dec 2014 #36
But some still do......... Capt.Rocky300 Dec 2014 #7
Seek relief with your state legislature. branford Dec 2014 #10
I know. I think the decision of the court is wrong because there are alternatives to lead. It would jwirr Dec 2014 #22
Agreed. But the swans are not game yet they die................. Capt.Rocky300 Dec 2014 #24
That is awful. More reason they made the wrong decision. jwirr Dec 2014 #25
Here's the problem jmowreader Dec 2014 #33
Only shotgun hunters going for birds typically use non-lead ammo NickB79 Dec 2014 #15
This hunter doesn't anymore. GGJohn Dec 2014 #26
Kudos to you, GGJohn for sanity. I hiss at the court and utter profanity: freshwest Dec 2014 #29
But the NRA thinks lead is part of a wholesome diet, apparently... freshwest Dec 2014 #28
Can't interfere secondvariety Dec 2014 #8
And that is precisely the attitude why the EPA has no jurisdiction over cartridges and shells. branford Dec 2014 #11
It's that superiority complex Plucketeer Dec 2014 #12
And that's exactly the type of attitude that hardens hunters against GGJohn Dec 2014 #27
"Those like you". secondvariety Dec 2014 #38
simple solution... allow use of steel bullets ...nt quadrature Dec 2014 #9
Steel is a poor substitute for lead NickB79 Dec 2014 #13
serious hunting... a tiny fraction of bullets used ... quadrature Dec 2014 #17
Steel bullets don't work all that well. Adrahil Dec 2014 #16
I am not against lead bullets .. I am against ... quadrature Dec 2014 #18
Steel core bullets are illegal in some states, not steel bullets hack89 Dec 2014 #20
Ah I see. n/t Adrahil Dec 2014 #21
Until a steel bullet sparks on a rock and starts a forest fire NickB79 Dec 2014 #40
I cast my own... ileus Dec 2014 #19
Guns Don't Kill, Bullets Do AndyTiedye Dec 2014 #23
Common sense helps in this issue Boxerfan Dec 2014 #30
Fortunately hunting license numbers have been on the decline. vkkv Dec 2014 #31
Why is that "fortunate?" branford Dec 2014 #32
Don't know about the inexpensive part... ileus Dec 2014 #34
$100/pound -- whaaat? Brickbat Dec 2014 #42
What are you hunting with, gold bullets? NickB79 Dec 2014 #44
The article is about lead toxicity. vkkv Jan 2015 #46
Hunting accounts for a very, very small percentage of rounds fired annually. benEzra Dec 2014 #37
They will increase bag limits if hunter numbers decline madville Dec 2014 #39
As hunting declines, farmers are clearing more land for crops NickB79 Dec 2014 #41
I don't use lead bullets anymore, period. Monometals are better in every single way. sir pball Dec 2014 #43
NRA members ate lead paint chips as kids True Blue Door Dec 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»On lead bullets, judges r...»Reply #44