Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: On lead bullets, judges rule against environmentalists [View all]NickB79
(19,243 posts)44. What are you hunting with, gold bullets?
But seriously, you can get into hunting for under $500 total (gun, ammo, scope, clothing, misc. equipment, license, etc) if you realize you don't need the newest, shiniest gadgets on the market.
A single-shot Rossi or NEF rifle, mil-surp. Mosin Nagant, or single-shot shotgun will set you back less than $200. If you step up to a pump-action shotgun, you can get a Mossberg 2-barrel combo that will allow you to hunt both waterfowl and deer for under $300. A basic 4X or 3-9X scope and a few boxes of generic softpoint ammo will set you back another $100.
And the great thing is that, once you buy the hardware, it lasts for years. The guns should last generations if well-cared for.
The butchers around here charge a couple dollars a pound for processing a deer, and if you are moderately skilled with a knife you can do the butchering in your garage or backyard. You can then turn steak into hamburger with a decent food processor if you feel like it: http://www.thekitchn.com/how-to-grind-your-own-meat-in-134272
Me? I like a more relaxed hunting experience, where I can stroll through the woods on nice days, so I hunt small game with a $100 pellet rifle from Walmart: http://www.walmart.com/ip/Ruger-Blackhawk-Elite/27678724
Amazingly accurate and surprisingly lethal on rabbits and squirrel out to 40 yards with headshots, ammo is everywhere and costs under $10/500 pellets. With a 6-mo hunting season and very generous bag limits, you can bag a lot of meat for not much money.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"The Toxic Substances Control Act exempts cartridges and shells from regulation"
arcane1
Dec 2014
#2
There was no way the court was going to permit the EPA to effectively institute gun control
branford
Dec 2014
#3
Many hunters do not use these types of bullets anymore. At least those who care about the
jwirr
Dec 2014
#4
A lot of my friends belong to Ducks Unlimited. They understand that if they use the lead and the
jwirr
Dec 2014
#6
Yep. I'm not a hunter, but I want to avoid the lead inadvertently getting into food supply.
Adrahil
Dec 2014
#14
They are fired into artificial berms, which are broken down and cleaned every 5 years.
Adrahil
Dec 2014
#36
I know. I think the decision of the court is wrong because there are alternatives to lead. It would
jwirr
Dec 2014
#22
And that is precisely the attitude why the EPA has no jurisdiction over cartridges and shells.
branford
Dec 2014
#11
I don't use lead bullets anymore, period. Monometals are better in every single way.
sir pball
Dec 2014
#43