Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
38. You may want to revise how you interact with people on the Internet.
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 12:36 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Tue Apr 1, 2014, 02:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Your current approach is off-putting.

/ignore.

ON EDIT: Those Mormons you were denigrating are my family. You know nothing about them, and nothing about me. To assume that I am condoning actions of the Mormon Church by showing respect for the beliefs of my family members is asinine. Not every individual of a church can be painted with the same broad brush. Do you believe that all Muslims are bomb-throwing caricatures? Every Catholic is a child molester? Does expressing respect for individual Muslims or Catholics automatically mean that I condone terrorism or pedophilia?

I'll answer that for you - NO!

depends how one defines spiritual. Deep13 Mar 2014 #1
I think the article points out that it is much more complex than that. cbayer Mar 2014 #2
Of course it does skepticscott Mar 2014 #3
My thoughts exactly. silverweb Mar 2014 #14
"Spiritual" is a word with diaphanous meaning. immoderate Mar 2014 #9
creates a danger of the fallacy of equivocation... Deep13 Mar 2014 #32
One doesn't need religion pscot Mar 2014 #4
Perhaps for some, religion is the right kind of mushroom. cbayer Mar 2014 #5
Transcendence is central to Zen pscot Mar 2014 #6
And I think that is why many may call themselves spiritual but not religious. cbayer Mar 2014 #7
Indeed pscot Mar 2014 #8
Many paths, pscot. Many paths. cbayer Mar 2014 #10
Poetry can be spiritual. I always found this so, in a sense. pinto Mar 2014 #13
One of my favorites as well. cbayer Mar 2014 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author pinto Mar 2014 #30
Was always fascinated with dervish, wondering where they "went". Or what it meant to them. pinto Mar 2014 #16
To me, "spiritual" = "metaphysical." Maedhros Mar 2014 #11
I think your definition of religion is one endorsed by many. cbayer Mar 2014 #12
My personal objection to religion? Maedhros Mar 2014 #17
Religionist - a term that focuses on zealots, not to cbayer Mar 2014 #18
Absolutely. I have great respect for a great number of religious people in my life. Maedhros Mar 2014 #19
"Just because I don't follow their path to enlightenment does not make their paths invalid." cbayer Mar 2014 #20
Likewise! Maedhros Mar 2014 #21
YES WE SHOULD!!! cbayer Mar 2014 #22
The fact that there are many different paths skepticscott Mar 2014 #23
Clearly. However, I am in no position to tell someone else what is and is not a valid path Maedhros Mar 2014 #24
And yet you are so deep into that deference skepticscott Mar 2014 #25
I'm not really following your line of thought. Maedhros Mar 2014 #28
As I said, you're very deep into the deference skepticscott Mar 2014 #31
What the hell are you talking about? Maedhros Apr 2014 #35
You said on the one hand skepticscott Apr 2014 #37
You may want to revise how you interact with people on the Internet. Maedhros Apr 2014 #38
Yes, I'm well aware skepticscott Apr 2014 #40
I'm an atheist, you fool. Maedhros Apr 2014 #43
As I said skepticscott Apr 2014 #45
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #46
And the bogus claim that "all paths are equal" skepticscott Apr 2014 #48
In the space of one short sub thread skepticscott Apr 2014 #49
I wasn't supporting the Mormon Church. Maedhros Apr 2014 #44
The Mormon church skepticscott Apr 2014 #47
What do you think about the Hobby Lobby case? n/t trotsky Apr 2014 #33
It's ridiculous. One's religious beliefs cannot exempt one from the law.[n/t] Maedhros Apr 2014 #34
Ah, I see. trotsky Apr 2014 #36
I was speaking of my own beliefs with regard to spritual matters. Maedhros Apr 2014 #39
Yep, clearly you weren't thinking of that. trotsky Apr 2014 #41
Hey - I'm inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt because of your user name, Maedhros Apr 2014 #42
It's an insult to challenge your thinking? trotsky Apr 2014 #50
Apparently skepticscott Apr 2014 #51
One person's spirituality. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2014 #26
Seems fine to me. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #27
I like the distinctions you make an definitions you use. cbayer Mar 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Spiritual but Not Religio...»Reply #38