Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 10:17 AM Apr 2016

Catholic Diocese in India Reinstates Priest Who Admitted Child Sex Abuse [View all]

http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2016/04/22/catholic-diocese-in-india-reinstates-priest-who-admitted-child-sex-abuse/

A Roman Catholic diocese in southern India said Thursday it consulted with the Vatican before reinstating a priest who pleaded guilty last year to the sexual abuse of a minor in the U.S.

The suspension of the priest, Father Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul, 61 years old, was lifted by Bishop Amalraj Arulappan from the Diocese of Ootacamund in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, earlier this year, Father Sebastian Selvanathan, a spokesman for the diocese said.

Father Jeyapaul was deputed to serve in the Diocese of Crookston in Minnesota in the U.S. in 2004. He returned to India in September 2005 and two years later, criminal charges were filed against him in the U.S. accusing him of sexually abusing a girl between 2004 and 2005. Father Jeyapaul was suspended from the Indian diocese in 2010.

...

The priest is living in the residential premises of the diocese, Father Selvanathan said, adding that “he has no responsibilities whatsoever.” When asked if Mr. Jeyapaul was prevented from having contact with children, Father Selvanathan said: “It is not a jail.” He didn’t comment on why Father Jeyapaul was reinstated.


Coming on the heels of the story I posted yesterday - Sex Abuse and the Catholic Church: Why Is It Still a Story? - well, there ya go. This is why it's still a fucking story. Here's a priest who admitted abusing children, and once again he's shuffled around and reinstated... and not prohibited from contact with children.

The church and its loyal defenders continue to sweep abuse under the rug. No big deal, it happens everywhere, what can you do. Well it's a big fucking deal whenever a child is abused. Yes it happens everywhere but in the RCC the situation is unique, and exacerbated by its teachings and practices, which continue to this day. And as to what you can do, how about you REMOVE THE ABUSER instead of protecting him and reinstating him?

Fuck all those whose response is a knee-jerk defense of their corrupt and harmful church.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fortunately, the rug is becoming transparent and threadbare. cleanhippie Apr 2016 #1
Speaking of threadbare and transparent, why have you stopped posting cartoons? rug Apr 2016 #12
So nothing really changes in the end. Eugene Apr 2016 #2
Well, they made their choice about how to handle it. trotsky Apr 2016 #4
How DARE you question the Church? xfundy Apr 2016 #3
Diocese in India weighs lawsuit filed in Minnesota struggle4progress Apr 2016 #5
"... The priest is living in the residential premises of the diocese ...“he has no responsibilities struggle4progress Apr 2016 #6
No responsibilities doesn't mean no contact with children Major Nikon Apr 2016 #13
They must have a different pope than the rest of Catholonia. Iggo Apr 2016 #7
Well there's the problem, in a nutshell - mr blur Apr 2016 #8
In what other profession can one admit to sexually abusing a child... trotsky Apr 2016 #9
Seems to have worked for Ted Nugent Major Nikon Apr 2016 #15
Catholic priest gets no prison time in Minnesota child sex abuse cases struggle4progress Apr 2016 #10
609.345 CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE FOURTH DEGREE. struggle4progress Apr 2016 #11
Regardless of what he pleaded this down to, it's child rape Major Nikon Apr 2016 #14
No, it actually isn't child rape, according to the news account I posted upthread: struggle4progress Apr 2016 #16
It actually is child rape Major Nikon Apr 2016 #17
He wasn't convicted of rape. And the exact allegations are not clear from news accounts I've found struggle4progress Apr 2016 #18
It actually is child rape Major Nikon Apr 2016 #19
... There was no conviction in a second case against Jeyapaul ... In that case, charges were filed struggle4progress Apr 2016 #20
Catholic priest child rapist gets no jail time, news at 11 Major Nikon Apr 2016 #21
Only in the religion forum is defending child rapers Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #22
Very telling that Major Nikon Apr 2016 #24
So if there is "no conviction" edhopper Apr 2016 #23
That's because this is flamebait for the converted. rug Apr 2016 #25
Thousands of horrid priests, many of which are still in the organization, which even Frank admits Major Nikon Apr 2016 #26
I might be able to consider you seriously rug Apr 2016 #29
I'm happy to admit that Major Nikon Apr 2016 #32
Anti-theism per se is not bigotry. rug Apr 2016 #34
"unconditionally" Major Nikon Apr 2016 #36
Discussing the epidemic of child abuse edhopper Apr 2016 #27
You gotta love the pretzel logic here Major Nikon Apr 2016 #28
Not nearly the level of pretzel logic required for you to assert the twelve aposteles rug Apr 2016 #31
Conveniently ignoring your pretzel logic with more pretzel logic. Brilliant! Major Nikon Apr 2016 #33
There is quite a difference between what you consider logic and what I consider logic. rug Apr 2016 #35
Obviously Major Nikon Apr 2016 #37
Except to do so the phenemonon of child sexual abuse outside the RCC. rug Apr 2016 #30
Actually arguing what is and isn't rape? Lordquinton Apr 2016 #38
Well now, protecting the church and its hierarchy of celibate men is important. trotsky Apr 2016 #39
What you did there? Lordquinton Apr 2016 #40
40 Replies Act_of_Reparation Apr 2016 #41
It's nice not being subjected to that, isn't it? n/t trotsky Apr 2016 #42
You got one more than me! (nt) mr blur Apr 2016 #43
I need to follow your lead. cleanhippie Apr 2016 #47
The worst part is the claim that children werent actually raped because the rapist wasn't convicted cleanhippie Apr 2016 #44
No conviction means no crime. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2016 #45
Or an asshole. cleanhippie Apr 2016 #46
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Catholic Diocese in India...»Reply #0