Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Can religious Democrats be progressives? [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)12. Not if they oppose abortion and want to restrict my rights.
If they oppose abortion rights they can be considered Democrats but not progressives.
Did you know DFL agrees with Trump and advocates defunding Planned Parenthood?
Yes, We Should Defund Planned Parenthood
STATEMENT OF KRISTEN DAY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF DEMOCRATS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA
For many years, many people have challenged the appropriateness of government funding of Planned Parenthood because the organization concurrently has received both funding to counsel pregnant women and to perform abortions. It is a basic principle of ethics that one cannot have any self-advantageous incentive, financial or otherwise, to counsel another person about a moral decision of such great magnitude.
Elected by voters set on eliminating taxpayer-funded abortions, President Donald Trump recently has called on Planned Parenthood to separate its abortion business from its other services in order to qualify for continued government subsidies.
Democrats For Life of America supports this compromise because:
http://www.democratsforlife.org/index.php/articles-and-op-eds/press-releases/990-defund-planned-parenthood
STATEMENT OF KRISTEN DAY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF DEMOCRATS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA
For many years, many people have challenged the appropriateness of government funding of Planned Parenthood because the organization concurrently has received both funding to counsel pregnant women and to perform abortions. It is a basic principle of ethics that one cannot have any self-advantageous incentive, financial or otherwise, to counsel another person about a moral decision of such great magnitude.
Elected by voters set on eliminating taxpayer-funded abortions, President Donald Trump recently has called on Planned Parenthood to separate its abortion business from its other services in order to qualify for continued government subsidies.
Democrats For Life of America supports this compromise because:
This accommodation satisfies the longstanding and bipartisan federal policy that prohibits taxpayer funding of abortion a policy that is supported by most Americans. Planned Parenthoods current extensive provision of abortion procedures (they are the largest abortion provider in the S.) sets it outside the acceptable parameters for receipt of federal government monies.
At Planned Parenthood, tax dollars currently subsidize pregnancy counseling services. This counseling gets taxpayer-funded reimbursement despite the fact that the primary pregnancy service Planned Parenthood offers is abortion. This bias invalidates the counseling because the organization clearly has a material interest in encouraging every pregnant woman to schedule an abortion. According to Planned Parenthoods 2014-2015 annual report, they served approximately 2.5 million people and performed 323,999 abortionsbut provided only 17,419 prenatal visits. And how many of those prenatal visits entailed counseling a mother to choose abortion rather than to choose birth?
If Planned Parenthood declines the compromise, the taxpayer funding should be allocated to the 9,800 Community Health Centers in rural and urban communities around the country that provide comprehensive medical care and other health care to more than 25 million people, far beyond the minimal reproductive services provided by Planned Parenthood to only one-tenth as many people.
http://www.democratsforlife.org/index.php/articles-and-op-eds/press-releases/990-defund-planned-parenthood
Interesting indeed. What kind of person thinks right wing anti-abortion propaganda is progressive?
Why do you think supporting the right to choose is a 'purity' test?
What about racism? If someone thinks PoC are inferior are we allowed to say they're not progressive? Would that make us 'purists'?
And lgbt equality? If someone thinks gay people shouldn't be allowed to get married or adopt children - are we allowed to point out that they're not progressive? Would that make us 'purists'?
Or is it just women's rights that can be sacrificed at the altar of progressive inclusiveness?
This may be a big tent and we may welcome anti-choice Democrats but we don't have to pretend that people who actively oppose my rights are progressive.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They can be as anti-choice for themselves as they want. But if they are anti-choice for other women,
50 Shades Of Blue
Apr 2017
#1
Opposing reproductive rights is regressive, it is a conservative position.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#15
So you agree it's not progressive to oppose women's reproductive rights.
beam me up scottie
Apr 2017
#24