Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: If you don't think having your registration mysteriously switched, [View all]highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)46. It is a disgusting mess. We would never advocate for this process in another "democracy".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you don't think having your registration mysteriously switched, [View all]
onecaliberal
Apr 2016
OP
I seriously can't believe I'm seeing dems support the same republican tactics
onecaliberal
Apr 2016
#4
And this very site was created because Bush stole the election from Gore in 2000.
Punkingal
Apr 2016
#20
I had my voting location changed, I did not allow tbis to keep me from voting.
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#2
"Bully for you", as Teddy would say. But the lack of compassion, empathy, and ability to fight for
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#3
I believe in justice, what are you implying. I have heard this more than once
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#6
I am sure you do. And we should all be concerned, in my opinion, with voting irregularities. Next
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#13
This was a primary, this was not a general election, choices of party was made, this is
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#29
If you don't think having your registration mysteriously switched...
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#42
As I stated previously I have also had my voting precinct changed, went to the place I was to vote a
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#43
It is a disgusting mess. We would never advocate for this process in another "democracy".
highprincipleswork
Apr 2016
#46
No, I did not risk my job, it happened I was off on primary day. I sought the information before
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#44
I do realize the time constraints. I did not run around complaining about this, running elections
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#55
Yes, we the people have voted 2.7 m more votes for Hillary, we care about democracy,
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#7
This was a primary election, it was not a general election, there is a difference.
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#23
you can vote for the candidate of your choice in the general election -IF YOU ARE smart enuff
msongs
Apr 2016
#12
He's also said he's willing to try to flip pledged delegates, on the theory that the most important
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#22
But it was okay for Hillary to buy up super-delegates before a single vote was cast.
djean111
Apr 2016
#37
The superdelegates endorsement of HRC so early in the process has been used to get
stillwaiting
Apr 2016
#40
Hillary and Bill have been meeting super delegates for months. There's NOTHING wrong
Zira
Apr 2016
#54
Not all those problems are of the same level of problem. And you could make similar
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#21
Exactly, caucuses left out the seniors and disabled. It was a primary election, republicans
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#26
A million Democrats figured out how to vote for Hillary Clinton yesterday...
brooklynite
Apr 2016
#33
You think it's bad automated, you should have voted back when it was all on paper. Talk about
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#35
Think back to the 2000 election and all the fraud. Who would have thought.......
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#36
It's unbelievable. The disturbing thing is that supposed dems are doing it and supporting it.
onecaliberal
Apr 2016
#38
Yes. The Establishment. It makes it clear why Dems did not change things when they had power. nt
stillwaiting
Apr 2016
#41
Why in hell would her affiliation be dropped because she changed her name. Complete ridiculousness.
onecaliberal
Apr 2016
#50