Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
17. I did. And the guy does mention it but says it still sounded louder to him.
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:29 AM
May 2016

It doesn't matter what it sounds like from the middle of the sanders section. That's totally irrelevant. What matters is the judgement of the chair, who by the rules has the ability to judge whether it is close enough.

Yes, the credentials committee was evenly split between Sanders and Clinton. Not very hard to figure out, and another fact that the video decided to conveniently omit.
http://nvdems.com/credentials-committee/

The fact that it's a video summary doesn't excuse it from not mentioning the chair throwing and death threats, which appeared all over the news. He cited other news articles in the video, why not the ones about the rioting? The death threats were a NYT headline, and "Thrown Chairs" was the first sentence. It was also reported in AP, WP, and other places but the video guy doesn't think it's worth even mentioning? And he does think it's worth quoting some comments from a Daily Caller article? It's a total joke.

Sanders had more people disqualified because Sanders people unregistered as Dems to spite the party. "According to the video" is meaningless because the video is Sanders/Daily Caller propaganda. The rules were followed, and Bernie lost. Then his supporters got upset and made sexist chants and death threats and threw chairs.

This sure makes it pretty clear to me pangaia May 2016 #1
When you watch it all go down in one straightforward timeline... TCJ70 May 2016 #2
pangaia—You asked how one stops it…… CobaltBlue May 2016 #3
Personally, I will do that. But, it is an easy choice for me pangaia May 2016 #7
pangaia—I am in Michigan. But if I was in Ohio, I’d still handle my vote the same. CobaltBlue May 2016 #18
Election theft gets free people upset. Who could forget Bush v Gore? senz May 2016 #24
That was a very reasonable presentation of the events of an insanely corrupt proceeding. reformist2 May 2016 #4
The Bernie people were mad because the Hillary people had more votes. YouDig May 2016 #6
There were more Sanders people there, they just weren't counted. reformist2 May 2016 #9
Bullshit on that. pangaia May 2016 #11
I thought it was pretty good, too. TCJ70 May 2016 #13
reformist2—How Hillary’s “fans” feel does not concern me… CobaltBlue May 2016 #14
You are correct. And now I'm worried dissenting voices won't even be allowed at the nat'l convention reformist2 May 2016 #16
The certification committee was bipartisan. It's not their fault that some Bernie delegates decided YouDig May 2016 #5
Sounds like thousands of registration changes to Dem were never processed - that's the scandal. reformist2 May 2016 #8
What do you mean "sounds like"? Are you just making this up? YouDig May 2016 #12
I'm not sure you watched the video... TCJ70 May 2016 #10
I did. And the guy does mention it but says it still sounded louder to him. YouDig May 2016 #17
I wish I had your simplistic worldview... TCJ70 May 2016 #21
You couldn't even figure out how to google the credentials committee, you don't understand YouDig May 2016 #22
Poetic Justice will be watching him/her whine when it happens to HRC in the General Election. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #19
I doubt they'll be around long enough for you to see it... TCJ70 May 2016 #20
Crystal clear... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #15
K&R -- we have plenty of video evidence of the Nevada events. This is one of the best. senz May 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Video summary of what hap...»Reply #17