Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
39. My honest take on it:
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:30 AM
May 2016

The GOP make awesome machine politicians; it's part of their nature. They organize well for specific purposes: the military, corporations, churches, etc. That allows them to organize well for other specific purposes such as elections.

This is not to be confused with the more individualist-minded conservative-libertarians who vote GOP.

In contrast the Democratic party was a camp for the refugees of GOP policy and realpolitik. It was a place for those who were without a voice to gather and combine their voices. It provided an organized structure but the lines between organized structures and machines is a thin one.

The attraction to Hillary is that she is a machine politician in the mold of Tammany Hall and Chicago. Since Bill's administration they have endeavored to engineer the structure of the Democratic party apparatus into a thing that doesn't represent Democratic voters as much as it serves their ambitions.

When the election approached the question was put before us: How do we plan to beat the GOP machine?

It's a fair question and it's a frightening prospect considering they made it through 8 years of Bush without ever having been held to account. They are formidable and to not be concerned about them would be foolhardy.

So, we were told the answer to their machine politicians was our own machine politician and that, naturally, was Hillary. Not that any other answer was possible because her machine was engineered only to produce that singular answer. And produce it, it has.

Heck, in the early days of the primary season her supporters even played her cronyism to corporate interests as a virtue. "Well, how else do you expect her to match GOP moneyed interests?" they sniffed.

But then came Trump. For all his barking baboon buffoonery he was one thing: Not a machine politician. In fact, it was his barking baboon buffoonery that showed him to not be a part of the machine. The GOP machine reviles him. Nobody thought he could clinch the nomination -- but he did.

Now we're stuck with a machine politician geared up to fight another machine politician except there's no machine for her to fight and what's worse is the Trump victory shows the electorate is in the mood to dismantle machines. The barking baboon is the monkey wrench the voters intend to throw into the machine. I'm not saying their choice of monkey wrench is good -- it may be effective but it definitely isn't good no matter how badly the machine needs to be dismantled.

So here we are.

We either back the machine, thus further entrenching it into our lives and political structure, ossifying it for the foreseeable future with its corporatism, wars of aggression, corruption, cronyism and disregard for the law or we stand by as a barking baboon riding a nihilistic wave anti-everything brings us God only knows what.

Is it too late to write in Alfred E. Neuman?

"we'll be fine: it's only the complaining that makes her poll badly" MisterP May 2016 #1
. XemaSab May 2016 #8
Either they think that they can win in Nov against trump regardless of Purveyor May 2016 #2
And it used to be you could count out being just plain stupid . . . not any more pdsimdars May 2016 #13
The email issue is resonating with many. HassleCat May 2016 #3
Secretary of State is 4th in line for the presidency XemaSab May 2016 #10
I'm with you about Hillary's damned emails 99th_Monkey May 2016 #11
The foundation is the crux of the email issue for many people Cal Carpenter May 2016 #19
That's what I would think, but I'm in the minority. HassleCat May 2016 #21
Actually, it is both/and as near as I can tell. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #37
It's getting coverage on 'bunny-ear' news - the local stations you can only pick up w/antenna. ebayfool May 2016 #23
People have experience with email unc70 May 2016 #30
oh look the sanders surrogates dont want her to be president. there's a shocker for ya nt msongs May 2016 #4
The NY Times is a Sanders surrogate? WTF. Did I misread your post? n/t mikehiggins May 2016 #5
16 Days...16 Days, and you can feel totally comfortable again..nobody to remind you insta8er May 2016 #7
Ya'know that bit about democrats needing a plan b??? catnhatnh May 2016 #12
There are a lot of Americans that don't trust her and don't want her to be president. rhett o rick May 2016 #15
If only there was some sort of polling on the subject mythology May 2016 #20
things have changed a lot since April. nt grasswire May 2016 #31
The party is making a mistake of historic proportions nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6
My honest take on it: Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #39
I am thinking more of the Mouse nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #40
Pat Paulsen! SusanCalvin May 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #9
Well, they thought they could handle Trump and had contingencies to thwart him but he is pdsimdars May 2016 #14
If the one is what I think it is, I believe they have that covered also. nm rhett o rick May 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #17
The establishment didn't get the Bush half of the contest they were hoping for NorthCarolina May 2016 #18
It torques my mind to contemplate a "choice" in Nov. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #22
Sander's ship is sinking actually Demsrule86 May 2016 #24
Excuse me, but your wishful thinking is showing. n/t 99th_Monkey May 2016 #25
HRC is still winning. Bernie still lost. But thanks for playing. Lil Missy May 2016 #26
HRC is gonna lose in November. liberalnarb May 2016 #29
You flatter yourself. Lil Missy May 2016 #34
look at the poll numbers grasswire May 2016 #32
The voters and not a political blogger have the right to make that decision. They chose Hillary. Trust Buster May 2016 #27
Suddenly it's all about the voters, and not the polls. Got it. nt 99th_Monkey May 2016 #36
Then why did the cycle start with proclamations of 'Super Delegate' vote leads? Bluenorthwest May 2016 #38
Current Affairs: "It’s a beautiful publication full of satire, wit, and elegance." Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #28
thank you for that source grasswire May 2016 #33
Yah, it was new to me too .. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #35
Hillary's campaign shows zero capacity to learn from previous mistakes. sorechasm May 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»THE DEMOCRATS ARE MAKING ...»Reply #39