Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 10:17 AM May 2016

ENOUGH! MY *PATRIOTISM* TRUMPS PARTY LOYALTY!!! [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by LostOne4Ever (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

And yes, I am using ALL CAPS in that subject line, because I have SERIOUSLY had ENOUGH of the snide obnoxious comments coming from certain members of this board who don't want to have any SUBSTANTIVE discussions about HILLARY CLINTON'S JUDGMENT!!!

I am currently a Bernie supporter, but for three decades I have voted for Democratic presidential candidates. I am not stupid. I know Trump is a disaster-waiting-to-happen...

And Hillary Clinton's EPIC BAD DECISION MAKING scares me as much as Donald Trump!!!

She supported the Iraq War, and didn't hold the REPUBLICAN administration accountable for LYING us into it (despite that duty as "loyal opposition in a two party system&quot . She was on the wrong side of marriage equality. The policies she advocated and implemented while Secretary of State created more chaos and death world wide than doing nothing, and that doesn't include planetary environmental concerns created with her promoting "fracking" as a global export.

But it is the "email and private server" situation that has me saying ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY NO!!! because it demonstrates the CORROSIVE EFFECT her personal beliefs and management style would have on the government transparency necessary for democracy in this country:

Per the spin, Hillary Clinton valued her PRIVACY and (maybe?) CONVENIENCE more than not only POSSIBLE dangers to NATIONAL SECURITY, but also FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT LAWS.

PRIVACY and CONVENIENCE: Those are not the actions of a person I am willing to make "Commander In Chief" of people who have agreed to put their LIVES IN DANGER in service to this country.

IGNORING RULES and COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: Those are not the actions of a person I am willing to put in charge of the NSA, CIA, FBI and DOJ, where ETHICS AND INTEGRITY are absolute requirements.

THREATENING and IGNORING THOSE WHO SPEAK "TRUTH TO POWER": Those are not the actions of a person I am willing to put in charge of ANYBODY. When subject matter experts are ignored or people FEAR coming forward as whistleblowers or when protections like "Inspector General" positions are intentionally left vacant or when people who catch government officials in wrongdoing either end up in jail or have to flee the country, I want those issues FIXED, and I don't mean by silencing the reports - I mean FIXED so that the next people in line don't decide not to report problems.

LYING: Life is too short to spend time parsing the words of someone whose words can't be trusted. The willingness to sacrifice the loyalty of supporters because of a fear of TRANSPARENCY while avoiding PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY and obfuscating on issues is completely unacceptable. Every Hillary supporter on this board who believed her when she said she was "following the rules" and "everybody else had private servers" is owed an apology from her because believing her lies made them look like idiots.

SERVICE TO OTHERS: This is a Representative Democracy. The people we elect are there in service to others. The "Federal Records Act" and "FOIA" are intended to provide institutional knowledge and historical information. There is no question Hillary Clinton, for unknown personal reasons, was working to make sure the records she and her staff created were not part of that public record. That is a Red Flag they are doing something wrong. Obviously, one needs to double check "ignorance and stupidity" are not involved, but after that, "judgment, ethics and behavior" follow, and FAIL in those categories is written all over this episode.

The State Department is NOT a "PRIVATE BUSINESS" - it is a government department intended to benefit the entire country, and "we the people" are the owners. Every citizen in this country has a right to know what is going on there both currently and historically, with obvious caveats for diplomacy and national security temporarily in place. The same concerns apply to the office of President. Knowledge is Power, and Power in this country belongs to the People.

I am a Democrat, but I am a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN FIRST. I will ALWAYS put the NEEDS of my country over the WANTS of my party, and if "my party" wants me to do anything differently, I will bolt out of the room so fast, it will make your head spin, and then I will take any treasonous bastard who tries to enable such corruption of Democratic principles down as well.

We are currently in "Primary Season" and those of us raising these LEGITIMATE CONCERNS about whether or not ANY CANDIDATE should be allowed the HONOR AND PRIVILEGE of leading this country are doing our PATRIOTIC DUTY AS CITIZENS. It is my privilege to vote, my responsibility to be informed, and my duty to use good judgment.

Hillary or Bernie or Trump or Other: I am not going to support a candidate for President who can't be trusted to safeguard and protect the lives, rights and freedoms of our citizens, our country, and the principles of our democracy.

I am a Democrat. That is what Democrats DO.

And anybody who says differently can go perform inappropriate anatomical acts on themselves.

87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You go first. You deserve it. tonyt53 May 2016 #1
Thanks, tonyt SCantiGOP May 2016 #53
Trump might randomly trigger wars. Hillary has described the wars she would start. lagomorph777 May 2016 #2
Agreed! IdaBriggs May 2016 #16
Very good OP. bkkyosemite May 2016 #3
Thank you. IdaBriggs May 2016 #17
Give 'em Hell Ida. Wish I wrote half as eloquently as you. EndElectoral May 2016 #4
Thank you. I feel very passionate about this topic. IdaBriggs May 2016 #21
I agree completely J_J_ May 2016 #34
Thank you for your support! IdaBriggs May 2016 #37
You first CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #5
Good rant. Fuck 'em if they don't like it. n/t leeroysphitz May 2016 #6
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #22
Yes, enough! Dem2 May 2016 #7
The inmates really are running the asylum. barrow-wight May 2016 #72
I didn"t see any rage in the OP. KPN May 2016 #77
Patriotism and Partisanship Are Two Different Things. MineralMan May 2016 #8
You are right that the two are different. alfie May 2016 #20
^== This. And this is why I added "Other" to the list. IdaBriggs May 2016 #23
You're welcome. eom alfie May 2016 #27
Patriotism can mean rejecting a candidate The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #38
Exactly! KPN May 2016 #79
Well said! n/t tokenlib May 2016 #9
Thank you. IdaBriggs May 2016 #24
Way to go, IdaBriggs! Octafish May 2016 #10
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #25
I didn't fight for my Country, I fought for corporations. I don't want that to happen to anyone else Joob May 2016 #11
Preach. I'm honestly glad I'm getting boarded... VulgarPoet May 2016 #14
Thank you, favored poet! IdaBriggs May 2016 #33
Thank you for your service, and your support. IdaBriggs May 2016 #26
BRAVO!!!!!! Faux pas May 2016 #12
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #28
/offers cupa hot chocolate & hug. "There, there, everything is going to be ok" Sunlei May 2016 #13
Thank you and I will take it! IdaBriggs May 2016 #29
X10000000 onecaliberal May 2016 #15
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #31
Righteous! Bravo and so very true Arazi May 2016 #18
Thank you! IdaBriggs May 2016 #32
Funny you should mention Trump, with your massive amounts of bold, CAPS and Italics Sheepshank May 2016 #19
Way to address the issue. bvf May 2016 #47
I didn't see any issues Sheepshank May 2016 #56
If you couldn't "read the post" bvf May 2016 #59
I simply felt like commenting on the writing style: CAPS, bold, italics in over abundance. Sheepshank May 2016 #76
... VulgarPoet May 2016 #54
^^^^ THIS!!! barrow-wight May 2016 #73
Then vote for Trump if you prefer him. Stop making it sound like someone is stopping you from Trust Buster May 2016 #30
... VulgarPoet May 2016 #55
Patriotism and the Sanders/Anti-War Narrative Garrett78 May 2016 #35
Thank you for sharing these links. IdaBriggs May 2016 #42
Actually, who cares what you do? The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #36
Well, let's start with people who bother to reply. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #44
principles, not party or person amborin May 2016 #39
Agreed! But I *expect* Democratic candidates to align with Democratic values. IdaBriggs May 2016 #43
. PeaceNikki May 2016 #40
Perfect. bvf May 2016 #41
It can if you like. Orsino May 2016 #45
Righteous rant I'm sure the swarm will descend upon like locusts nc4bo May 2016 #46
+1,000,001 dchill May 2016 #52
It's really disappointing to see blind partisanship take over vintx May 2016 #62
Good points IDA Mbrow May 2016 #48
If you sit out the fall because your man didn't win, you're a statistical insignificance Tarc May 2016 #49
Yes, Gore felt the same way about Nader voters. EndElectoral May 2016 #50
Nader was a 3rd-party candidate, which Bernie will not be Tarc May 2016 #51
... VulgarPoet May 2016 #57
K to the R Ferd Berfel May 2016 #58
Thank you. A LOT of Dems do not like/trust her. vintx May 2016 #60
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place" -Gandhi Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #61
Well in this case the conscience of the majority is in the right place Lodestar May 2016 #78
Where is the loyalty? loyalsister May 2016 #63
Oh baloney. How many hyper-formatted manifestos did you type up when Snowden and Manning ucrdem May 2016 #64
So why aren't Petraeus or Clinton heroes? VulgarPoet May 2016 #67
Maybe they are? Ask the OP. ucrdem May 2016 #68
The verb in your headline sentence is certainly an accurate one. Nonhlanhla May 2016 #65
Exactly. People can't pretend that we're not a 2 party system or... themaguffin May 2016 #80
SO DOES MINE!!!!!!!!!! NCTraveler May 2016 #66
I could not agree with you more! Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #69
I know that her actions have crossed my line merbex May 2016 #70
Your righteous indignation is unconvincing. barrow-wight May 2016 #71
Agreed, the tantrums and condescension gets old. themaguffin May 2016 #81
Join the ever-growing ranks of "down-ballot Democrats" who support the down-ballot candidates but Attorney in Texas May 2016 #74
What a waste of a rant. randome May 2016 #75
Is this a Poe's Law thing? nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #82
Get 'em in while you still can...nt SidDithers May 2016 #83
I am a party loyalist. Setting aside patriotism, nominating Clinton is self-destructive to the party lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #84
Absolutely. K&R dana_b May 2016 #85
Brava. K&R AtomicKitten May 2016 #86
LOCKING THREAD AS DISRUPTIVE META LostOne4Ever May 2016 #87
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»ENOUGH! MY *PATRIOTISM* T...»Reply #0