2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: WSJ: "Clinton Might Not Be the Nominee" [View all]Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)both to Bill and to Hillary. Please see my link to his bio in wiki (in this thread). That's why this post should remain, and why it is a particularly interesting OP.
I don't object to RW sources when the link is merely informative, as with some of the posts about the Judicial Watch lawsuit, for reference to documents that are in the public record, and information that may affect the FBI investigation. We DO need to know what's going on. I hope you would agree. I don't understand efforts to make DU merely a propaganda site, and not an informative site. And if you don't know what ammunition Trump is going to use against Clinton, if she's the nominee, then you won't make a good advocate for her. Sanders doesn't use this kind of ammunition (the email server scandal, the John Kerry State Department OIG report). He specifically disavowed doing so. He's focused on the issues that directly impact peoples' lives. But Trump IS NOT FOCUSED ON those issues. He's a public policy idiot! So what is he going to use? Clinton supporters will need to know chapter and verse of what Clinton did, what laws some people think she broke and so on. Because you're going to be hearing about it 24/7 for a very long time.
Extending this "head in the sand" attitude to a Clinton advisor--Schoen--just because he says she may not be the nominee, is absurdly "head in the sand."