Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
26. You are wrong
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:46 AM
Jun 2016

In a fair election, all candidates would get equal non-partisan air time (publicly paid) so people could learn who they are. Too many people are not on-line all the time seeing all the info out here. They are glued to their TV's. And yet you think it's OK that the media can cover one candidate over the others in the race?

Bernie started getting loud and excited crowds early on and he was completely ignored. And Hillary started with a huge lead in delegates, which were continuously given out by the news as her winning the race from the very beginning. Lots of people just go with the brand name, especially if they are winning. Superdelegates should never be used early in the race by the media to sway the public vote. Only at the convention.

Sorry, but your idea of a system that may not be fair but is just the way it is...that's not the kind of "way" I want. Too many people are not happy with the way this country is going and we are going to change it. You can kick and scream and say it's not fair that a revolution isn't respecting the establishment...boo hoo. We are starting now by helping down ticket progressives to win and we will keep doing that until we can change congress enough to actually see some possibilities for change. And we are going to find another leader like Bernie and we are coming back and we are going to get the money out of politics and are going to have people in congress who are responsible to the voter, not the lobbyist.

We are going to make this country great again (gag...why did Trump have to use that)...because we are going to bring back FDR democrats.

Like I said. We are fed up and we're not going to take it any more. We may lose the first battle, but we'll be in it for the long run.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

well, if we go there, and discount red states, Bernie wins by a landslide larkrake Jun 2016 #1
But not OK, KS, UT, AK, and ID. They totally matter. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #3
As to the last quoted line, yeah Hillary supporters have done the same. morningfog Jun 2016 #2
Sure RobertEarl Jun 2016 #4
There is no such thing as a fair playing field in real life. Eko Jun 2016 #7
That's why RobertEarl Jun 2016 #8
Your question makes no sense. Eko Jun 2016 #9
Nice dancing RobertEarl Jun 2016 #10
Fair elections? Eko Jun 2016 #13
There's no "i" in con. Fuddnik Jun 2016 #44
Thanks lol. Eko Jun 2016 #47
I stated your reasons Eko Jun 2016 #14
Why dont you Eko Jun 2016 #16
Wont anwser the question? Eko Jun 2016 #22
And people who say that Eko Jun 2016 #11
Do you have any clue what democracy means? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #15
First off Eko Jun 2016 #17
Democracy means that the person with more votes wins. Tortmaster Jun 2016 #57
According to your version of fair Eko Jun 2016 #19
It's not delegitimizing the candidate. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #27
So you agree Eko Jun 2016 #34
I must have missed that. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #40
The one you first Eko Jun 2016 #45
You are right, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #18
see post 19 Eko Jun 2016 #20
You are wrong passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #26
I think the equal non-partisian air time Eko Jun 2016 #33
News used to have standards passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #48
I agree Eko Jun 2016 #49
If that is all that is offered for news, people will watch it. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #52
So you think it is not a fair playing field Eko Jun 2016 #54
Blacked him out? Eko Jun 2016 #21
Yes, blackout is hyperbole. How about virtual blackout? passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #38
Virtual blackout? Eko Jun 2016 #42
So...whatever you can get away with, then? Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #28
With friends like those, eh? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #29
No kidding! Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #31
I was told to come back when I get wise. Eko Jun 2016 #35
Wrong! RobertEarl Jun 2016 #37
It will get hidden for meta. Eko Jun 2016 #39
Damn RobertEarl Jun 2016 #41
Why dont you repost Eko Jun 2016 #43
You posted it RobertEarl Jun 2016 #46
So,,, Eko Jun 2016 #50
Oh no!!!!! Eko Jun 2016 #55
Here ya go Eko Jun 2016 #56
Yeah, Eko Jun 2016 #36
And sometimes it's just rigged. Nt azmom Jun 2016 #5
Rigged elections? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #23
K&R 👍🏼 Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #6
So, are the Sanders supporters here starting to realize this? eastwestdem Jun 2016 #12
"I don’t think there’s any way you could construct a delegate system where Bernie Sanders would win Number23 Jun 2016 #24
Sanders' impact on the Dem Party in full: Minnesota moves to presidential primary in 2020 Number23 Jun 2016 #25
You mean that as a neoliberal (neocon?) you HOPE that is his legacy. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #30
If I had any idea what point you were even PRETENDING to be making right now, that would be Number23 Jun 2016 #32
My discourse right here is perfectly calm. As it is a discussion board I am discussing. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #53
"Bye. Forever Ignore for you." Number23 Jun 2016 #61
Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 by a half million, and every Democrat ... Tortmaster Jun 2016 #51
Clinton isn't whining about caucus, nor yelling cheating. So no, seabeyond Jun 2016 #58
The caucuses are about as unfair as you can get when it comes to disenfranchising voters StevieM Jun 2016 #59
Absolutely. The state of Washington highlights, significantly more voters, and for Clinton, solidly. seabeyond Jun 2016 #60
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders and Rigged...»Reply #26