Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The state of ".. or bust" [View all]stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)31. We should report JackSquatFanaticals to SPLC.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And are those who claim Clinton doesn't need the votes of Sanders' supporters still sticking
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#1
Nah! If they dump Trump she would win by a wider margin as Trump's supporters . . .
brush
Jun 2016
#37
No one has more negatives than Trump. And a 3rd party run would be a disaster for the repugs
brush
Jun 2016
#76
your statistics are a bit misguided. polls are all over the place on Sanders supporters.
Exilednight
Jun 2016
#14
I meant to post 70% not 79%. I will edit my number of Sanders supporters who will vote blue
brush
Jun 2016
#17
According to who? You? Not the case at all. Most demvoters are sensible enough to not want Trump in.
brush
Jun 2016
#75
There was a post here last week on a poll result asking Sanders supporters that very thing.
brush
Jun 2016
#95
it was CBS/WSJ poll and it was NPR that referenced it in a story. The point is
Exilednight
Jun 2016
#59
Actually, Manu have said that. Their attitude had been, screw you, we don't need you anyway. And it
DebDoo
Jun 2016
#23
With the electoral college, it is absolutely binary. Either Trump wins, or Hillary wins.
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#9
If you had bothered to read post 11 you would've seen that we aren't including . . .
brush
Jun 2016
#20
Hopefully you won't be voting for him since you know what you are getting and all.
leftofcool
Jun 2016
#47
You're the ones who had to found a separate site because YOU couldn't handle opposing opinions.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#36
A lot of them were/are actual gold star, paying DU members. I'm sure the admins will disagree. nt
Snotcicles
Jun 2016
#21
They are some of the nastiest people ever over there. I wonder how many are here pretending to
qdouble
Jun 2016
#87
Agreed. You cannot say what they're saying and call yourself "progressive" in any way.
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#89
That site is filled with rabid hateful crazy people. No respect at all is over there cursing the
qdouble
Jun 2016
#86
I don't think they mind losing folks who are all about calling our first female candidate
JTFrog
Jun 2016
#28
for real lol... DU would be so much better if we had people openly expose their hatred
qdouble
Jun 2016
#43
That place is a sewer...anybody who expresses most of the shit over there isn't really a democrat
qdouble
Jun 2016
#22
It's an echo chamber for a select few who insist that DU is too echo-chambery.
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#55
Why are you asking now? The opposition was never interested in our input before.
floriduck
Jun 2016
#85