Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I will not be gracious in victory over the FBI investigation. [View all]Her Sister
(6,444 posts)190. Boojah!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
205 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sure you think you're very clever there, but you ignored a simple thing in your own argument.
Zynx
Jul 2016
#196
Did you miss the part where they scoured ALL OF AMERICAN HISTORY for a comparable prosecution
BobbyDrake
Jul 2016
#4
No, they presented Fox News spin as fact, and now they are working overtime
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#27
And this didn't come anywhere close to being an actionable violation. So...case closed.
randome
Jul 2016
#37
where did you get that? She was proven negligent and careless. That is not to celebrate
larkrake
Jul 2016
#155
Innocence was not proven, neither was intent. It is a non issue that grows mistrust
larkrake
Jul 2016
#170
I watched it too and that passage made me think of some one else who did just that — Snowden
brush
Jul 2016
#20
Would that mean Comey supports Snowden??? Or that Snowden supporters are pro-Hillary?
floppyboo
Jul 2016
#44
NO ... those DUers wishing upon the HRC Indictment fairy were/are very supportive of Snowden.
1StrongBlackMan
Jul 2016
#54
he did not say she isnt a criminal, he said it would not be easy to indict so far
larkrake
Jul 2016
#156
there are degrees of criminality. He can not prosecute without solid proof of intent
larkrake
Jul 2016
#163
you are entitled to your opinion, and intent was never implied by Comey or me
larkrake
Jul 2016
#165
I dont think it had anything to do with "secrecy". It was about convenience and control.
DCBob
Jul 2016
#169
It's always a bad sign when you have to make stuff up to support an argument.
lapucelle
Jul 2016
#33
Are you making these criticisms in order to help Hillary become a better candidate per the rules?
nolawarlock
Jul 2016
#89
Hah! The Republican FBI director just couldn't resist adding his politically-motivated
pnwmom
Jul 2016
#94
And to show you how clueless they are they say they hope Bernie goes Green.
stevenleser
Jul 2016
#131
They're still talking about BS taking the nomination at the convention. Just insane.
Squinch
Jul 2016
#138
K&R! ^^^This!^^^ Spot ON. SHAME on them all! How can any reasonable Liberal or Progressive
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#57
We'll see. I fully expect Trump to start running on the promise of bringing charges.
Vinca
Jul 2016
#73
You think a candidate vowing to throw the opposition in prison makes for an attractive
geek tragedy
Jul 2016
#93
It amazes me that posting links to that site on DU doesn't violate the new rules.
nolawarlock
Jul 2016
#102
I agree. But note, I had a post hidden supposedly because I was rehashing primary.
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#101
It's like a thousand other conspiracy shitstorms that proved to be nothing.
Agnosticsherbet
Jul 2016
#105
Agreed! That Comey guy has been investigating the Clintons for decades, so that
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#118
Yup! If the pro-indictment crowd hadn't been so obnoxious, this could have been avoided.
Zynx
Jul 2016
#150
The vultures were circling for months now, but their prey escaped to live another day.
Beacool
Jul 2016
#147
nothing was proven wrong, it just isnt inditable at this time, take a deep breath, but do
larkrake
Jul 2016
#154
Ultimately, the only thing that matters is if there were criminal charges or not.
Zynx
Jul 2016
#199
So in other words you admit to being a poor winner, which is worse than a sore loser.
hobbit709
Jul 2016
#184
They were asking if you feel like you're on the losing side of an argument. Were you hoping for an
Zynx
Jul 2016
#198